Should the Mueller Report be public?

**anatta** · 02-23-2019, 10:06 AM

Originally Posted by Frank Apisa

That is one of the dumbest things you've ever written in JPP, Earl.

The Democrats...and Independents like me...ARE ASKING THAT THE ENTIRE REPORT BE RELEASED. Most of us realize that there are probably security reasons for withholding some few items...but we are lobbying for complete release (of anything but those things.)

The assholes of your side want a recent Trump appointee to choose what to release.

Yet you are one of the people suggesting those who want the entire thing released...are the people looking for selective things to be released.

That is beyond stupid.

Get the hell off it.

we want the proper authority to decide what to release,and you don't know AG Barr if you think he bows to political pressure

**Earl** · 02-23-2019, 10:06 AM

Originally Posted by Frank Apisa

That is one of the dumbest things you've ever written in JPP, Earl.

The Democrats...and Independents like me...ARE ASKING THAT THE ENTIRE REPORT BE RELEASED. Most of us realize that there are probably security reasons for withholding some few items...but we are lobbying for complete release (of anything but those things.)

The assholes of your side want a recent Trump appointee to choose what to release.

Yet you are one of the people suggesting those who want the entire thing released...are the people looking for selective things to be released.

That is beyond stupid.

Get the hell off it.

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

**anatta** · 02-23-2019, 10:08 AM

Originally Posted by Earl

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

it will be a PROSECUTORIAL statement - with no mitigation by a Defense like a true report

**Frank Apisa** · 02-23-2019, 10:09 AM

Originally Posted by domer76

“Isn’t required” There you go. That’s your go to excuse for hiding the uncomfortable truth.

“Isn’t required” How fucking lame is that?

Right you are.

It "isn't required" for a president to be a decent, reasonable, educated person...but we certainly can hope we get better than the abomination we have now.

**Frank Apisa** · 02-23-2019, 10:10 AM

Originally Posted by anatta

we want the proper authority to decide what to release,and you don't know AG Barr if you think he bows to political pressure

I think Barr will do the right thing...and I have said so many times in this forum.

But the discussion here has nothing to do with what I expect of Barr.

**Earl** · 02-23-2019, 10:11 AM

Originally Posted by Frank Apisa

Jesus H. Christ, Earl...NEITHER YOU NOR DERSHOWITZ KNOWS EVERYTHING Cohen has said so neither of you can possibly reach the conclusion that there are no crimes possibly shown in Cohen's testimony.

Give it up. Stop being stupid enough to defend this abomination in the White House.

Read carefully, Frank:

"I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums"

I neither said or inferred that I know everything...nor does Mr. Dershowitz.

**Frank Apisa** · 02-23-2019, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by Earl

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

I do not care what you "believe"...because I think you have got your head up your ass right now.

The people asking that the entire thing be released...want that.

Why you are saying they want part redacted is beyond comprehension.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

Fuck you.

No...FUCK YOU.

**Earl** · 02-23-2019, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by Frank Apisa

Jesus H. Christ, Earl...NEITHER YOU NOR DERSHOWITZ KNOWS EVERYTHING Cohen has said so neither of you can possibly reach the conclusion that there are no crimes possibly shown in Cohen's testimony.

Give it up. Stop being stupid enough to defend this abomination in the White House.

Read carefully, Frank:

"I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums"

I neither said or inferred that I know everything...nor does Mr. Dershowitz.

**Frank Apisa** · 02-23-2019, 10:15 AM

Originally Posted by Earl

Read carefully, Frank:

"I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums"

I neither said or inferred that I know everything...nor does Mr. Dershowitz.

Don't you even read what you post, Earl?

Here is what you posted:

"[T]he big picture is that even if everything he [Cohen] says is true, it's not a crime," said Dershowitz on the July 27 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360.

If you (and Dershowitz) do not know EVERYTHING Cohen has said...how can that statement make any sense?

Wake up!

**Earl** · 02-23-2019, 10:15 AM

Beautiful riposte, do you have any more gems?

Work on that self-discipline.

**Frank Apisa** · 02-23-2019, 10:18 AM

Originally Posted by Earl

Beautiful riposte, do you have any more gems?

Work on that self-discipline.

Fuck you!

Gotta go feed the sheep.

Be back in an hour to see how successful you were at that.

**jimmymccready** · 02-23-2019, 10:20 AM

I believe that the Republicans will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

**Earl** · 02-23-2019, 10:23 AM

Originally Posted by jimmymccready

I believe that the Republicans will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

As I posted, I believe it will all be leaked except the classified information. Perhaps even that will be leaked too by Hillary.

**domer76** · 02-23-2019, 10:33 AM

Originally Posted by Frank Apisa

Right you are.

It "isn't required" for a president to be a decent, reasonable, educated person...but we certainly can hope we get better than the abomination we have now.

I suppose that’s how the Trump apologists approach life. They don’t do anything that “isn’t required”.

Just fucking lame.

**domer76** · 02-23-2019, 10:36 AM

Originally Posted by Earl

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

Wrong again, Earl. I want to see every damn word.

Hey, you never did answer the four times I asked you this question. Here’s the fifth time.

What is McCabe charged with and who is charging and prosecuting him?