Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 34

Thread: Trump Administration Says It Will Rescind $929 Million In Funds For California High-S

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    324
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked 79 Times in 62 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 21 Times in 19 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tkaffen View Post
    Find out if Amtrak is making a profit.
    Amtrak is a third rate train system.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,643
    Thanks
    300
    Thanked 548 Times in 419 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 35 Times in 34 Posts

    Default

    Are you brain dead. I asked a yes/no question.
    Now that you have stated your opinion why don’t you tell me which US train system is first rate.
    I ride Amtrak quite often and have never had problems.
    Other than going faster and newer what will be the differences between riding Amtrak and the bullet train.

    Did anyone figure out ridership numbers when the project is done. That’s a question. I don’t need a response that deviates from the question.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Tkaffen For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,381
    Thanks
    6,685
    Thanked 12,320 Times in 9,828 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTQ64 View Post
    Trump Administration Says It Will Rescind $929 Million In Funds For California High-Speed Rail

    Maybe.... WE.... California, will withhold its federal contributions then. Then watch 90% of the red states STARVE TO DEATH. Keep messing with the Worlds 5th largest economy and LARGEST US economy at your own peril you worthless piece of shit.



    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump...b0e37a1ed28ee1
    the red pilling of California....

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Blackwater Lunchbreak For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,381
    Thanks
    6,685
    Thanked 12,320 Times in 9,828 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    now, in the moment of their supreme intransigence, they see why the new world order will never work. #cowsinthefarside

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Blackwater Lunchbreak For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  8. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    324
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked 79 Times in 62 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 21 Times in 19 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tkaffen View Post
    Are you brain dead. I asked a yes/no question.
    Now that you have stated your opinion why don’t you tell me which US train system is first rate.
    I ride Amtrak quite often and have never had problems.
    Other than going faster and newer what will be the differences between riding Amtrak and the bullet train.

    Did anyone figure out ridership numbers when the project is done. That’s a question. I don’t need a response that deviates from the question.

    There is no first rate train system in the US. Amtrak's speed is an issue for most...Chicago to Detroit takes eight hours...and that's not even a long trip. As far as ridership is concerned...the only thing you could use to predict that would be bullet trains abroad.

    It's not all about ridership money either. California is looking to take cars off the road.

    That being said, those who say such a project doesn't deserve federal money may get their way.

  9. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,643
    Thanks
    300
    Thanked 548 Times in 419 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 35 Times in 34 Posts

    Default

    It is only 5 hours from Detroit to Chicago.

    The problem with the project besides the cost is the distance. Instead of building to San Francisco (400 miles) they are only building to Bakersfield (171 miles).
    Price of the ticket will determine if people will continue to drive or take the train.
    Location of the stations is a factor. Are the stations close to work or will they have to transfer to a bus or metro.
    Lower income people will continue to ride the bus. They aren’t moving out of the intercity.

    They have a metro and light rail system in place. I don’t understand why they didn’t extend the tracks to the system that already exits.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Tkaffen For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  11. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Minister of Truth For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  13. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,381
    Thanks
    6,685
    Thanked 12,320 Times in 9,828 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tkaffen View Post
    It is only 5 hours from Detroit to Chicago.

    The problem with the project besides the cost is the distance. Instead of building to San Francisco (400 miles) they are only building to Bakersfield (171 miles).
    Price of the ticket will determine if people will continue to drive or take the train.
    Location of the stations is a factor. Are the stations close to work or will they have to transfer to a bus or metro.
    Lower income people will continue to ride the bus. They aren’t moving out of the intercity.

    They have a metro and light rail system in place. I don’t understand why they didn’t extend the tracks to the system that already exits.
    who wants to go from detroit to chicago?

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Blackwater Lunchbreak For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  15. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,901
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,821 Times in 17,257 Posts
    Groans
    5,339
    Groaned 4,596 Times in 4,274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tff View Post
    Amtrak is a third rate train system.
    Which is why we need to build a better system. High-speed rail is in most advanced countries. Glad you agree we should build it.

  16. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    Trump is famous for vengeance.

    Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk
    If you want to continue to act like an asshole....expect to be treated like an asshole. The question was asked....Why does California need any FEDERAL FUNDS...collected from many and various RED STATES? I don't see any other top 10 world economy begging for help from their neighboring states. Truth: California does not have a wealth problem...but a mis-management problem. A state like California should not need any federal assistance....the reason it does, the high cost of living, some of the highest taxes on personal property, gas, water, etc. in the civilized world...not to mention the care and upkeep of millions of ILLEGAL immigrants it calls CITIZENS. When adjusted for inflation....California does not have the world's 5th or 6th GDP......it is ranked at number 11.

    More importantly.....states like TEXAS has the world's 7th largest MILITARY. If there is no method of protecting your rights...what rights do you expect to keep?

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Ralph For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  18. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    If you want to continue to act like an asshole....expect to be treated like an asshole. The question was asked....Why does California need any FEDERAL FUNDS...collected from many and various RED STATES? I don't see any other top 10 world economy begging for help from their neighboring states. Truth: California does not have a wealth problem...but a mis-management problem. A state like California should not need any federal assistance....the reason it does, the high cost of living, some of the highest taxes on personal property, gas, water, etc. in the civilized world...not to mention the care and upkeep of millions of ILLEGAL immigrants it calls CITIZENS. When adjusted for inflation....California does not have the world's 5th or 6th GDP......it is ranked at number 11.

    More importantly.....states like TEXAS has the world's 7th largest MILITARY. If there is no method of protecting your rights...what rights do you expect to keep?
    I am not impressed with your name calling or your rationale.
    He who is the author of a war lets loose the whole contagion of hell and opens a vein that bleeds a nation to death. Thomas Paine

  19. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    I am not impressed with your name calling or your rationale.
    Again...don't confuse TRUTH with hate. An asshole by any other name is still an asshole. Californians were born with assholes.....the older they get the bigger the hole gets until it becomes a vacuum. SoCal by majority. You know the Mexifornians? Then we have the city dump known as San Francisco. The rest of the state appears to be more WELL ADJUSTED and does not think the world owes them a living.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Ralph For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

  21. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,821
    Thanks
    16,886
    Thanked 21,030 Times in 14,526 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tkaffen View Post
    Once again you failed to tell the entire truth.
    The project that was projected to cost 45 billion will now cost 77 billion
    You forgot to mention that 64% don’t want the rail system.
    Do you really think people will give up their cars. The lower income bracket won’t be allow to afford a ticket. Besides their low paying jobs are local. Who will ride your train?
    You also failed to mention the federal government gave the money with the understanding California would build the rails from LA to San Francisco and there is no such plan.
    Because of the cost they will only build rails for 171 miles not the 400 miles that California sold to the feds.

    Well Mr. 5th largest economy you don’t need federal dollars. Waste your own money. California lost 2.5 percent of its population to domestic migration. When you increase taxes for the train project watch more leave the state. Try collecting revenue from the hugh homeless population or the illegals. Good luck.
    Somehow, you forget to mention that this was Ahnold's baby, and he underestimated the cost. Couple that with the fact that he planned on private investment, which is never reliable for infrastructure projects.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  22. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,901
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,821 Times in 17,257 Posts
    Groans
    5,339
    Groaned 4,596 Times in 4,274 Posts

    Default

    It is not clear if Trump has the power to take the money back for his wall.

  23. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,643
    Thanks
    300
    Thanked 548 Times in 419 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 35 Times in 34 Posts

    Default

    I don’t care if it was a Republican or Democrat. It’s a waste of money. If it’s Arnie’s plan Newsom inherited a money suck project. They should have extended the current metro lines.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Tkaffen For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-22-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-12-2018, 06:19 AM
  2. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 05-14-2018, 07:25 PM
  3. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL COST $114 MILLION, TRUMP'S SO FAR IS $10 MILLION
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-28-2017, 08:57 PM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-14-2017, 09:35 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-01-2017, 09:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •