These Are The Faces Of The 19th Amendment

[Legion]

I'm just saying this is the reason so many women don't vote Republican.

Who told you that?

[CFM]

What does that word mean to you?

Those that should be asked such a question are the ones that claim it's such a bad word then freely use it like any other word.

[Aimée]

Those that should be asked such a question are the ones that claim it's such a bad word then freely use it like any other word.

I don't know anyone who uses that word. I have seen it thrown about here like confetti and it made me highly curious.

[CFM]

I don't know anyone who uses that word. I have seen it thrown about here like confetti and it made me highly curious.

Whether you personally know them is irrelevant. That those claiming it's so bad using it then justifying how 'it's different' is the relevant part.

If a black person calls another black person by that term, and they do whether or not you "know anyone" that does, and I agree, is that racist in your opinion?

When the very people that claim it's such a negative term use it themselves, it invalidates any claim they make about it being racist.

[Aimée]

Whether you personally know them is irrelevant. That those claiming it's so bad using it then justifying how 'it's different' is the relevant part.

If a black person calls another black person by that term, and they do whether or not you "know anyone" that does, and I agree, is that racist in your opinion?

When the very people that claim it's such a negative term use it themselves, it invalidates any claim they make about it being racist.

So, do you call people other than "black people" the n-word? If you just reserve it for people of color, then yes. It IS a racist term. Context also matters. If it's used in anger towards a person of color and no one else, then yes, it IS a racist term. Even if you are just using it for the shock value to shut your opponent up, it's still a racist term.

[CFM]

So, do you call people other than "black people" the n-word? If you just reserve it for people of color, then yes. It IS a racist term. Context also matters. If it's used in anger towards a person of color and no one else, then yes, it IS a racist term. Even if you are just using it for the shock value to shut your opponent up, it's still a racist term.

The term "white nigger" has a history going back over 150 years. In the 1840s and 1850s, Irish Americans were referred to by that term. Robert Byrd, former Klan member AND 60 year elected member of the Democratic party used it twice in a speech in 2001.

I noticed you avoided the question about a black person calling another black person by the terms that offends you. That tends to be the way things are done.

Context does not matter. That's the excuse used by those that have the hypocritical mindset of it's only racist when whites use it. You're claiming the TERM is racist then saying it's not based on who says it.

[Aimée]

The term "white nigger" has a history going back over 150 years. In the 1840s and 1850s, Irish Americans were referred to by that term. Robert Byrd, former Klan member AND 60 year elected member of the Democratic party used it twice in a speech in 2001.

I noticed you avoided the question about a black person calling another black person by the terms that offends you. That tends to be the way things are done.

Context does not matter. That's the excuse used by those that have the hypocritical mindset of it's only racist when whites use it. You're claiming the TERM is racist then saying it's not based on who says it.

I am not the only one who is avoiding questions. You never answered mine. What does that word mean to you, and do you only use it on people of color? And yes, context does matter.

What I am hearing from your posts is the more complex version of "well, Jimmy does it, too!!"

[CFM]

I am not the only one who is avoiding questions. You never answered mine. What does that word mean to you, and do you only use it on people of color? And yes, context does matter.

What I am hearing from your posts is the more complex version of "well, Jimmy does it, too!!"

I haven't avoided one. You didn't like the answer so you pretend it wasn't given.

Context does not matter if you consider the TERM racist. The context argument is nothing more than trying to justify how one person doing something is OK and that same person saying it's wrong when someone else does.

If that's what you're hearing, see an Audiologist ASAP. You have it it all wrong, as usual.

[Aimée]

I haven't avoided one. You didn't like the answer so you pretend it wasn't given.

Context does not matter if you consider the TERM racist. The context argument is nothing more than trying to justify how one person doing something is OK and that same person saying it's wrong when someone else does.

If that's what you're hearing, see an Audiologist ASAP. You have it it all wrong, as usual.

If this word is so peachy-keen, then why are you getting so defensive? No, you haven't answered them, only posts with deflection and this last one with ad hom.

[CFM]

If this word is so peachy-keen, then why are you getting so defensive? No, you haven't answered them, only posts with deflection and this last one with ad hom.

Who is defensive? I stated facts and you disagree. Not my fault you ignore the truth.

I answered all your questions. You, like so many others, equate not liking the answers with not getting one. Answering doesn't involve answering the way you think I should.

You're the one that said you're hearing things.

[Flanders]

Call her the face of the hard-left 19^th Amendment:

March 11, 2019
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: The Face of the Left
By Lloyd Marcus

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti..._of_left_.html

[Flanders]

Here are more faces of the 19^th Amendment:

Jane Fonda and Angela Davis

Women’s Hall of Fame Inducts Jim Jones Sycophants
by Daniel J. Flynn
April 5, 2019, 12:05 AM

https://spectator.org/womens-hall-of...es-sycophants/

[Eagle_Eye]

[CENTER]

Thanks for the laugh! Great post!

[Flanders]

UPDATE

Will the Senate Censure Crazy Mazie Hirono?
by Jeffrey Lord
May 3, 2019, 12:05 AM

https://spectator.org/will-the-senat...-mazie-hirono/

Hirono is not only the result of the 16^th and 19^th Amendments, she is surely the face of Freakdom. Basically, Socialism/Communism cannot destroy this country. It is freaks like Hirono et al. that will tear down this country because that is their hidden objective —— not the positions they preach with so much venom. She is not alone. This country is suffering in the throe of freaks with political power.

Were it not for the 19^th Amendment she would be just another bitter woman barely able to hold onto a minimum wage job. Instead of being shunned, the 19^th Amendment elected her, while the 16^th Amendment gave her the income she always knew she was entitled to. There is nothing more satisfying to a freak than sucking up tax dollars like a giant vacuum cleaner.

Bottom line: The 19^th Amendment told Hirono she is morally superior. The 16^th Amendment convinced her she is not a freak.

[Flanders]

Finally, if you know nothing else about Democrat ladies know this: Female Democrats show their true colors after they get to Washington. Now if only Americans repeal the 19^th Amendment every American —— except bone-ugly feminazis —— will be better off.

I am not wasting time watching television mouths talking about Democrats. Reading headlines on the Internet is enough to tell me the Democrat Party’s old hags will never be enough to call for repealing the 19^th Amendment, while the new crop of parasites are making repeal necessary.

The new generation of female America-haters make no bones about everything they stand for. Every policy they advocate clearly attacks the country, the Constitution, national sovereignty, and life itself. The old hags stood for the same policies but they were smart enough to hide their hatred for this country. Filthy Hillary Clinton even wrapped herself in the flag whenever it was expedient.

Basically, the old hags were able to disguise their blind hatred in welfare state programs before social media challenged television’s grip on political dialogue. The new faces get the same protection from media mouths the old hags always enjoy, while the new anti-America officials have no choice but to openly display their hatreds because of social media. They figured out that admitting the obvious is a better strategy than the one the old hags used for decades.