Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 132

Thread: The Creation Of Wealth

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,976 Times in 32,291 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    if at the end of the day I have money that I did not have in the morning, I have produced it.......

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Tkaffen (02-19-2019)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    La Pine, Oregon
    Posts
    5,218
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 1,548 Times in 1,137 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 215 Times in 201 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Howard the Duck View Post
    If you are utilizing your land to provide a service, such as lodging, then you are producing a service. It's not really complicated unless you are a leftist.
    Could not grasp what they are saying so you resort to your fantasy world. If you don't have someone to change the sheets how many customers will you have?

    It really is that simple unless you are a low IQ right winger.
    "2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    at least you have a viable idea for a change...about time.

    GDP IS wealth -goods and services produced by an economy. You can't discuss wealth creation without it.

    Your "parasitical" sounds like it's limited to a mercantilism policy of gold/ore and natural resources only being 'wealth'
    It isn't my idea you moron, it is basic macroeconomics.

    GDP is simply a measure of effort and has nothing to do with wealth creation.

    "There is a bar to all knowledge...that bar is contemp prior to investigation."

    If you are unfamiliar with a concept, at least research it before you condemn the messanger. Or, remain a fool, your choice.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    Did I mention GDP? Idiot
    I am talking about actual wealth, not a verbal construct.

    As stupid as you are, I am not surprised you don't know what a parasite is, but you are one. Leeches and mosquitoes are examples of parasites.

    Never seen anyone as proud of his ignorance as you.
    You are a parasite. How's that for knowing?

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    La Pine, Oregon
    Posts
    5,218
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 1,548 Times in 1,137 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 215 Times in 201 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    if at the end of the day I have money that I did not have in the morning, I have produced it.......
    Money is simply a symbol of a standard of exchange. Of what value is your money when there is nothing exchange it for? If the farmer were to quit producing a crop, or the steelworker were to quit producing steel, etc., how much is your money worth?

    Do you know what "fiat currency" is?
    "2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,447
    Thanks
    23,965
    Thanked 19,108 Times in 13,083 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Old Trapper,

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Trapper View Post
    Since there seems to be some confusion about the creation of wealth I have decided it is a topic that needs to be discussed so the more ignorant among us can actually grasp who it is that creates the=is wealth, and who it is that is profiting from the labors of others to the extent that they have become pariahs in our world. We can start here.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...nomy-parasites

    So entrenched is this assumption that it’s even embedded in our language. When economists talk about “productivity”, what they really mean is the size of your paycheck. And when we use terms like “welfare state”, “redistribution” and “solidarity”, we’re implicitly subscribing to the view that there are two strata: the makers and the takers, the producers and the couch potatoes, the hardworking citizens – and everybody else.

    In reality, it is precisely the other way around. In reality, it is the waste collectors, the nurses, and the cleaners whose shoulders are supporting the apex of the pyramid. They are the true mechanism of social solidarity. Meanwhile, a growing share of those we hail as “successful” and “innovative” are earning their wealth at the expense of others. The people getting the biggest handouts are not down around the bottom, but at the very top. Yet their perilous dependence on others goes unseen. Almost no one talks about it. Even for politicians on the left, it’s a non-issue.

    To understand why, we need to recognise that there are two ways of making money. The first is what most of us do: work. That means tapping into our knowledge and know-how (our “human capital” in economic terms) to create something new, whether that’s a takeout app, a wedding cake, a stylish updo, or a perfectly poured pint. To work is to create. Ergo, to work is to create new wealth.

    But there is also a second way to make money. That’s the rentier way: by leveraging control over something that already exists, such as land, knowledge, or money, to increase your wealth. You produce nothing, yet profit nonetheless. By definition, the rentier makes his living at others’ expense, using his power to claim economic benefit.

    This is an interesting example of what the article speaks of, or part of it anyway:

    http://inthesetimes.com/working/entr...porate_welfare

    Here is another part of the Amazon scam you will not hear about:

    http://inthesetimes.com/article/2157...pe-cities-data
    In France, the government fears the people. If some policy is not working the people might go on a general strike. This is noticed by government, which usually acts to quell the discontent, because if it doesn't, it gets replaced.

    In the USA, the people fear the government. This is wrong, because government is our friend. But people fear the government because they wrongly blame government for our problems which are mainly caused by rich and powerful greedy people who direct government to do the things THEY want done. Let the rich puppet-masters pull the strings, let government take the heat.

    Part of the reason the USA government does not fear the people stems from something capitalism did. Capitalism tied health care to work. There are no general strikes in the USA because nobody wants to get fired for not showing up. Workers are afraid to strike, afraid to lose their health care, afraid to be unable to find another job without a good reference from the old one.

    The creation of wealth, USA style, involves creating a system where the workers are afraid to stand up for their own rights, afraid of the power of the big corporations, and blaming government out of frustration.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,976 Times in 32,291 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Trapper View Post
    Money is simply a symbol of a standard of exchange. Of what value is your money when there is nothing exchange it for? If the farmer were to quit producing a crop, or the steelworker were to quit producing steel, etc., how much is your money worth?

    Do you know what "fiat currency" is?
    I know that if I have money, "YOU didn't build that".......if the farmer has no crop, he cannot rent my farmland.......if the steel worker quits working he cannot hire my services........

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    If most people don’t earn their wealth how do they get it? Why do so many suckers go to work each day? What’s the secret to be rich and avoid it?
    The secret to being rich is very simple, save money.
    Live below your means.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    Evmetro (02-19-2019)

  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,447
    Thanks
    23,965
    Thanked 19,108 Times in 13,083 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Old Trapper,

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Trapper View Post
    Since there seems to be some confusion about the creation of wealth I have decided it is a topic that needs to be discussed so the more ignorant among us can actually grasp who it is that creates the=is wealth, and who it is that is profiting from the labors of others to the extent that they have become pariahs in our world. We can start here.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...nomy-parasites

    So entrenched is this assumption that it’s even embedded in our language. When economists talk about “productivity”, what they really mean is the size of your paycheck. And when we use terms like “welfare state”, “redistribution” and “solidarity”, we’re implicitly subscribing to the view that there are two strata: the makers and the takers, the producers and the couch potatoes, the hardworking citizens – and everybody else.

    In reality, it is precisely the other way around. In reality, it is the waste collectors, the nurses, and the cleaners whose shoulders are supporting the apex of the pyramid. They are the true mechanism of social solidarity. Meanwhile, a growing share of those we hail as “successful” and “innovative” are earning their wealth at the expense of others. The people getting the biggest handouts are not down around the bottom, but at the very top. Yet their perilous dependence on others goes unseen. Almost no one talks about it. Even for politicians on the left, it’s a non-issue.

    To understand why, we need to recognise that there are two ways of making money. The first is what most of us do: work. That means tapping into our knowledge and know-how (our “human capital” in economic terms) to create something new, whether that’s a takeout app, a wedding cake, a stylish updo, or a perfectly poured pint. To work is to create. Ergo, to work is to create new wealth.

    But there is also a second way to make money. That’s the rentier way: by leveraging control over something that already exists, such as land, knowledge, or money, to increase your wealth. You produce nothing, yet profit nonetheless. By definition, the rentier makes his living at others’ expense, using his power to claim economic benefit.

    This is an interesting example of what the article speaks of, or part of it anyway:

    http://inthesetimes.com/working/entr...porate_welfare

    Here is another part of the Amazon scam you will not hear about:

    http://inthesetimes.com/article/2157...pe-cities-data
    I love "In These Times."

    Great magazine.

    I agree with all of this.

    Workers create wealth. Capitalists take it.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  12. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    You are a parasite. How's that for knowing?
    No, dipshit. I create wealth using four of the five means available.
    I manufacture, I fish, I farm and I engage in forestry.

    Of all people, I am the least parasitic possible.
    You, of course are just a venom slinging moron.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  13. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,643
    Thanks
    300
    Thanked 548 Times in 419 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 35 Times in 34 Posts

    Default

    You are right labor has to keep the system going, however someone had to start the process.

    Wealthy Henry Ford was the inventor and innovator. He created jobs. He paid wages. Employees spend those wages creating other jobs.

    The wealthy railroad barrons laid track and cities sprung up. The railroad barrons had the money and the foresight. There actions created jobs.

    Let’s talk about someone more current. That rich scum Bill Gates. Gates started Microsoft in 1975. He hired people as his company developed. He now has 131,000 employees world wide. Those employees are paid. They spend their money creating other jobs. These employees keeps the company growing and in existence. That’s a good thing for them.

    The story is the same with Walton and Bezos.

    It would seem these innovators deserve their wealth.

    I hope this simple economics lesson helps the more ignorant among us.

  14. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    No, dipshit. I create wealth using four of the five means available.
    I manufacture, I fish, I farm and I engage in forestry.

    Of all people, I am the least parasitic possible.
    You, of course are just a venom slinging moron.
    You claim to do those things. Interesting how all of you that claim to do so much refuse to prove it.

  15. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    if at the end of the day I have money that I did not have in the morning, I have produced it.......
    No you didn't, you just took it from someone else.
    You are a perfect example of both a parasite and a rentier.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  16. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    La Pine, Oregon
    Posts
    5,218
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 1,548 Times in 1,137 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 215 Times in 201 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    GDP= sum total of goods and services in an economy. work produces wealth, but so does investing.
    wealth creation by investing is moving money around to accomplish business expansion or start ups.

    The renter example above provides housing for the tenet -the tenet works to pay the rent and buy food etc.
    So renting facilitates wealth creation -and renting mean more housing is built as that housing stock would remain dormant without a renter.
    By keeping housing in demand, that eventually means more housing has to be built -wealth creation by tangible goods and services.

    Socialism retards the movement of money and the creation of wealth -both needed to keep an economy moving.
    It retards the desire to innovate as the intellectual property is either controlled by the state or so highly taxed the R&D $$ used ( paid out by the inventor) is no longer worth the risk because the reward is gone.

    Money has to move in an economy. I agree piling it up in a bank and not investing it doesn't grow wealth.
    except even that gives the bank money to use for loans and other investment

    How about stocks? again the stock buyer is taking a risk that his investment earns money.
    But the investment also provides capital for the company to use to start up/grow

    Not that there isn't abuse in these system, which is why we regulate.

    good topic
    I will go into your regurgitated spat in a little bit. But for now see if your wee little mind can grasp this concept.

    Let us say that a plague hits the country, and all millionaires, and billionaires, die. How much wealth will then be created? In fact, it will be replaced.

    Now, let us say that the same plague hits the country, and it kills off all of those who are paid less then 15 dollars an hour. How much wealth will be created? None since there is no one there to do the work.
    "2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Old Trapper For This Post:

    PoliTalker (02-19-2019)

  18. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,643
    Thanks
    300
    Thanked 548 Times in 419 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 35 Times in 34 Posts

    Default

    Not all Mosquitoes are a parasite.

    Did you know that mosquitoes kill 750,000 people a year.

Similar Threads

  1. Is job creation top priority or not?
    By tekkychick in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-26-2013, 08:38 PM
  2. Who's historically better at job creation?
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-17-2012, 07:23 PM
  3. What the Tea Party did instead of job creation
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-31-2011, 11:42 AM
  4. Job creation, rightwing style
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2011, 04:24 PM
  5. The keys to job creation
    By Canceled.LTroll.8 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 10-17-2010, 08:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •