Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 91

Thread: How do they do that?

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    It’s just so amazing that you know more than all the experts on the subject. Where do you get such inside information that they don’t have? From the other statistical sources that Orangetweet lied about in the Rose Garden? You know, the ones that disagreed with his own administration’s numbers.

    Fucking delusional halfwit.
    But you even posted that it was only what was DISCOVERED and said nothing about all entering.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,523
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Exactly how to do you count what you have not DISCOVERED? However I already made it plain. You are being stubbornly wrong as usual. If they are finding a lot of drugs in one place and not much in others, where do you think most drugs are coming through. I guess if they find nobody carrying drugs in an opening, that must prove that they are all getting through unseen and it is obviously the main drug point. That is what makes sense to you.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    domer76 (02-16-2019)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Just posted this in your silly thread of denial. Here we go again. The US Customs and Border Protection agency, which is actually charged with gathering the stats say that 90 percent of heroin, 88 percent of the cocaine and 80 percent of fentanyl comes in through the ports of entry. Of course you are prone to believe Trump, the lyingest president in history. Trump cites Homeland Security and agency run by Gillibrand a Repub that Trump appointed and bosses. He says he uses her stats, but does not say what they are. It does not matter to you. That has been proven, You think Trump is right and the agencies involved know less than daffy.
    But wait Nordi buddy, aren’t you and your Democrat party the same folks that ignore and deny the US Customs and Border Protection Agency when they say they need walls in particular parts of the border? And now you want to anoint them as your MOST BELIEVABLE source of evidence for your arguments?

    Again you failed Nordi buddy! All you’ve done here is parrot something you’ve read or heard, but you offer ZERO specifics as to HOW the drugs entering the United States UNDETECTED are counted when they’re actually UNDETECTED ????? How do they count the 80 & 90 % of UNDETECTED buddy???? Try again Nordi, THINK!!!
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Argue with the experts, idiot.


    “According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection statistics, 90 percent of heroin seized along the border, 88 percent of cocaine, 87 percent of methamphetamine, and 80 percent of fentanyl in the first 11 months of the 2018 fiscal year was caught trying to be smuggled in at legal crossing points.
    While those numbers deal only with drugs that are caught, border experts say the data accurately reflect the way drug cartels successfully smuggle narcotics into the country.

    “Regardless of the number of drug dogs and technology and intelligence, the potential of smuggling the drugs in through a port of entry is far greater. Your ability to be captured coming across between a port of entry is much greater," said Kerlikowske, now a professor of practice in criminology and criminal justice at Northeastern University. "It's very clear that (drugs) come*through the ports."

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ll/2591279002/
    Just like your partner in crime, Nordi, all you've done here is parrot statistics you've read or heard. Apparently leftist have no ability to think for themselves. You make no valid attempt to explain how those 10 & 12 % of UNDETECTED drugs are counted. Again, how do they count UNDETECTED ??????
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Yeah I fucked up it is Neilson. She is kneepadding with Trump.
    I make stupid mistakes too Nordi buddy, but I'm almost 83 years old!!!! Your excuse is?????
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Rightys are asking a lot. They want someone to tell them how many drugs were not seized. Is there some methodology you can suggest? They know how much they seize at ports and how much they get in open areas. Since the drugs seized at ports is way more that 10 times as much, it is easy to surmise that much more is coming through them. That work for you?
    But aren't the ports more secure Nordi? Aren't there more agents there in a more confined space? Have you ever THOUGHT about how they know and count whats coming across where it's unrestricted and agents are far spread out and no walls to at least slow the flow? And haven't you ever THOUGHT about how they know the number/percentage of those that got by them UNDETECTED and what it actually is??? How do they know there's not more getting by them at the open areas as related to the ports of entry Nordi buddy???
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    It’s just so amazing that you know more than all the experts on the subject.
    What's really amazing is that y'all lefties can't explain how the "experts" know what they say they know and you only believe them when it's most convenient for y'all, but when they say they need walls in some places y'all ignore em, go figure!!!!
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    Just like your partner in crime, Nordi, all you've done here is parrot statistics you've read or heard. Apparently leftist have no ability to think for themselves. You make no valid attempt to explain how those 10 & 12 % of UNDETECTED drugs are counted. Again, how do they count UNDETECTED ??????
    Why don’t you and FREEDUMBFUCK co-write a letter to the experts to correct their errors. After all, you have some insight they do not.

    I’m sure they will give it all the consideration it deserves.

    Clueless dumbfuck.

  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    What's really amazing is that y'all lefties can't explain how the "experts" know what they say they know and you only believe them when it's most convenient for y'all, but when they say they need walls in some places y'all ignore em, go figure!!!!
    Well, let’s see. Those experts have compiled data from thousands upon tens of thousands upon hundreds of thousands of interdictions through the years. The data from both types of apprehensions shows that the vast majority comes through the ports of entry. Makes sense, doesn’t it? How much can be brought through on one semi versus on your back? How much more traffic is there at a port of entry versus through the desert?

    Now, tell us, Einstooge. How many drug inderdictions have YOU made through the years where you would even posses one single fucking clue on the issue?

    I’ll answer for you. ZERO

  11. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Why don’t you and FREEDUMBFUCK co-write a letter to the experts to correct their errors. After all, you have some insight they do not.

    I’m sure they will give it all the consideration it deserves.

    Clueless dumbfuck.
    You're truly a natural leftist, all you have is juvenile insults and unfounded accusations. But I've known all along you could never answer the OP question rationally, honesty or civilly.
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  12. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    The Democrats like to drive home a statistic, that 90% of all drugs are stopped at America’s ports of entry to the point of ad-nausea. Where does that statistic come from, and how does anybody know 90% of all drugs coming to America are stopped at the ports of entry when they logically have no clue how many drugs get into America undetected, if they’re undetected? How do they count “undetected?”
    Hey numb scull!

    Do you honestly think drug cartels would risk trying to carry 3 million dollars of drugs through miles of desert wilderness on foot, only to be apprehended by border patrol agents? If it were your money- would you?

    You do know, most people who try to cross the border illegally, who go around the normal ports-of-entry, are captured as soon as they reach civilization, or try to pass through any one of the hundreds of Border Patrol checkpoints that are on every road within 50 miles or more from the border.

  13. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Well, let’s see. Those experts have compiled data from thousands upon tens of thousands upon hundreds of thousands of interdictions through the years. The data from both types of apprehensions shows that the vast majority comes through the ports of entry. Makes sense, doesn’t it?
    It surely does “make sense” that they actually discover a set percentage at both places, because that’s what their DISCOVERIES show. That only compares the percentages relative to DISCOVERED drugs. How does it incorporate NON-DISCOVERED drugs anyplace????? How can Democrats claim that only 10% of drugs come through open areas, when there’s absolutely no way to know how many UN-DISCOVERED drugs get through at any and all areas, because they are apparently UN-DISCOVERED ??????

    How much can be brought through on one semi versus on your back? How much more traffic is there at a port of entry versus through the desert?
    What’s preventing all terrain vehicles from transporting drugs over in open areas? There may well be more coming into ports of entry, but how does anybody know the correct percentage ratio? There could well be more drugs getting through at open areas, because the territory is so vast and un protected by a wall and thereby much, much harder to patrol and DISCOVER the drugs!!!

    Now, tell us, Einstooge. How many drug inderdictions have YOU made through the years where you would even posses one single fucking clue on the issue?

    I’ll answer for you. ZERO
    Typical leftist juvenile insulting blather!!! It might be funny if it weren’t soooooo pathetic and stupid!!!! I thank you and CARRY ON!!!!!
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  14. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    You're truly a natural leftist, all you have is juvenile insults and unfounded accusations. But I've known all along you could never answer the OP question rationally, honesty or civilly.
    Unfounded?

    Let’s see all your inside information that proves all these on-the-ground experts wrong. All you’re doing, moron, is bloviating on a subject that you have ZERO knowledge of. Trying to disagree with the numbers compiled from hundreds of thousands of interdictions. Laughable. You sound just like the pathological liar in the White House where he depends on “other statistics”. Got “other statistics”, Trumpanzee? Let’s see them.

    You have provided NOTHING to make your case. Just more RW bullshit that we have come to expect from Trump and his Trumptards. That’s you, pally boy.

  15. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    It surely does “make sense” that they actually discover a set percentage at both places, because that’s what their DISCOVERIES show. That only compares the percentages relative to DISCOVERED drugs. How does it incorporate NON-DISCOVERED drugs anyplace????? How can Democrats claim that only 10% of drugs come through open areas, when there’s absolutely no way to know how many UN-DISCOVERED drugs get through at any and all areas, because they are apparently UN-DISCOVERED ??????



    What’s preventing all terrain vehicles from transporting drugs over in open areas? There may well be more coming into ports of entry, but how does anybody know the correct percentage ratio? There could well be more drugs getting through at open areas, because the territory is so vast and un protected by a wall and thereby much, much harder to patrol and DISCOVER the drugs!!!



    Typical leftist juvenile insulting blather!!! It might be funny if it weren’t soooooo pathetic and stupid!!!! I thank you and CARRY ON!!!!!
    First, you fucking idiot, DEMOCRATS aren’t making the claim. The numbers come from Trump’s own administration. Customs and Border Control, idiot.

    Have you heard back from Customs and Border Control on your claims? Did you include all your own personal expertise and experience in drug interdictions? I’m sure they’ll give your vast experience in the field all the weight it deserves.

    You’re a fucking fool, moron. Give up before you embarrass yourself any further.

  16. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf_Twitler View Post
    Hey numb scull!
    Hey yourself, child!!!

    Do you honestly think drug cartels would risk trying to carry 3 million dollars of drugs through miles of desert wilderness on foot, only to be apprehended by border patrol agents? If it were your money- would you?
    Apparently you don't know about, or think drug cartels can, and do use all terrain vehicles, huh?

    Why would a drug runner risk 3 million dollars worth of drugs by attempting to sneak them under the noses of a border patrol inspection point????

    You do know, most people who try to cross the border illegally, who go around the normal ports-of-entry, are captured as soon as they reach civilization, or try to pass through any one of the hundreds of Border Patrol checkpoints that are on every road within 50 miles or more from the border.
    I only know that’s what some people claim. I also know some folks claim that 90% of our drugs come across the southern border. Im also wonder how they know that they never tell us how many are actually manufactured in this country or come in through other ports of entry in containers and other hiding places. And again how do they count the NON-DISCOVERED drugs they never can count or use to figure out and report their percentage ratios???

    In other words why should anybody believe any statistics based in the UNKNOWN ?????
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •