I have. Not a single one of them can define 'global warming' or 'climate change'. Every one of them just depends on the same fabricated data from the IPCC, NOAA, and NASA (which basically just copy each other).
It's the same fundamentalism the Church of Global Warming has always been, but now is taking on militant tones.
The highest microwave frequency is 170Ghz with a wavelength of 1.8mm. To emit at that frequency, the emitting molecule would have to be 1.8 deg K. That's damn cold. Are you sure you are using the correct terminology?
Measuring the radiance of Earth is meaningless unless you know the emissivity of Earth. You don't know how much is due to thermal radiance and how much is due to reflections.
No satellite measures an absolute temperature of anything. It's not possible for a satellite to do so.
So you assume a temperature, then say that IS the temperature. Right. Now you're making even less sense.
Here is the basic science that you are attempting to use (badly). It is called the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
radiance = SBconstant * emissivity * temperature ^ 4
Where:
radiance is in watts emitted per square meter.
SBconstant is a constant of nature.
emissivity is a measured constant, denoting how well the body absorbs and emits light, as opposed to reflecting it. Expressed as a percentage from 0% to 100%.
temperature is in deg Kelvin.
The problem you seem to have is the emissivity value, which is the inverse of albedo,which is a measured value. The method of measuring this value requires first knowing the temperature of the emitting surface accurately, then comparing the measure emission to an ideal body of 100% emissivity at the same temperature.
The problem is not one of honesty, it is one of not understanding how the emissivity value is determined.
You still seem to be using the wrong units. You are describing a body that is only in the range of 1.8 deg K, according to Wien's law.
Nonsense. Kids are people. You deniers would like them to be undeveloped deniers- but they're not.Absolutely correct! It's sick stuff...
You are knowingly destroying their future- and you're going to pay for that.
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
Never said they weren't.
Inversion Fallacy. This is what YOU want... YOU want them to be undeveloped deniers of science, denying the laws of thermodynamics and the stefan boltzmann law. YOU want them to be good lil' commies...
Their future is just fine. There is no such thing as a "greenhouse gas"... There is no way to measure global temperature, even today.
You say that the temperature of Earth is increasing... SHOW me... Be sure to adhere to the axioms of Statistical Mathematics...
Bookmarks