Okay. Let's look at this.
Say a forest that exists now where there used to be an ice sheet. You say the climate has 'changed'. What has 'changed'? How do describe a 'change'? Yes, they are two different climates, but there is no 'change'. There is simply two different climates at different times in the same place.
How do you describe a 'change'?
The Stefan-Boltzmann law, which can be derived from Planck's law.
This law states:
radiance = SBconstant * emissivity * temperature ^ 4
Radiance is in watts/sq meter. Temperature is in deg K. Emissivity is a measured constant from 0 to 100%. Do you see a frequency term in this equation? (hint: There isn't any!)
This equation holds true regardless of the composition of the radiating body. No substance behaves differently, not even 'greenhouse' gases.
You're an idiot. You prats that ignore realities and substitute cut-and-paste hobby-horse science are cheerleaders for climate terrorism.So...you don't know, eh?
Anybody attempting to deny the realities of global climate is a dangerous half-wit.
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
I studied thermodynamics at university as part of my chemistry degree. I fail to see what the Stephan-Boltzmann Law E = ε’σT4 has to do with satellites detecting microwave emissions from atmospheric oxygen. As for the global temperature, it is most commonly stated as being around 288K or 15C.
Stupid mutts.
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
Bump.
..........
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
Bookmarks