Climate strike: UK school pupils take part in call for urgent action

[Into the Night]

It doesn't take an education to know the big money powers to be have screwed up badly.

How, exactly?

How is that related to big money? How is 'big money' a power?

[Into the Night]

I hope that all the parents and teachers that allowed this are taken to court and fined, attempting to politicise nine year olds is beneath comtempt. Sadly that's par for the course for the hard Left.

I have to agree with you there.

[Into the Night]

Well, it's not getting colder, matey!

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. We have no idea if it's getting colder, warmer, or just staying the same.

[Into the Night]

Bloody vacant, brainwashed clown. Have you ever met any children this age, you blathering bugger?

I have. Not a single one of them can define 'global warming' or 'climate change'. Every one of them just depends on the same fabricated data from the IPCC, NOAA, and NASA (which basically just copy each other).

It's the same fundamentalism the Church of Global Warming has always been, but now is taking on militant tones.

[Into the Night]

gfm7175;

Untrue. You've actually announced that the earth has no climate . That's an appeal to ignorance.

Earth has many climates. There is no such thing as a global climate, for there is no such thing as a global weather.

[Into the Night]

Satellites measure the natural microwave thermal emissions from oxygen in the atmosphere.

The highest microwave frequency is 170Ghz with a wavelength of 1.8mm. To emit at that frequency, the emitting molecule would have to be 1.8 deg K. That's damn cold. Are you sure you are using the correct terminology?
Measuring the radiance of Earth is meaningless unless you know the emissivity of Earth. You don't know how much is due to thermal radiance and how much is due to reflections.

I am not sure why you're not aware of that already.

No satellite measures an absolute temperature of anything. It's not possible for a satellite to do so.

Regarding the value of ϵ that is explained in great detail here. This assumes that the energy balance have the precise values: ε = 0.78; Tp = 288.2 K; Ta = 242.4 K.

So you assume a temperature, then say that IS the temperature. Right. Now you're making even less sense.

[gfm7175]

I hope that all the parents and teachers that allowed this are taken to court and fined, attempting to politicise nine year olds is beneath comtempt. Sadly that's par for the course for the hard Left.

Absolutely correct! It's sick stuff...

[Into the Night]

It is self evident to me that you're incapable of understanding the basic science.

Here is the basic science that you are attempting to use (badly). It is called the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

radiance = SBconstant * emissivity * temperature ^ 4
Where:
radiance is in watts emitted per square meter.
SBconstant is a constant of nature.
emissivity is a measured constant, denoting how well the body absorbs and emits light, as opposed to reflecting it. Expressed as a percentage from 0% to 100%.
temperature is in deg Kelvin.

The problem you seem to have is the emissivity value, which is the inverse of albedo,which is a measured value. The method of measuring this value requires first knowing the temperature of the emitting surface accurately, then comparing the measure emission to an ideal body of 100% emissivity at the same temperature.

I don't have the patience to help you to be honest.

The problem is not one of honesty, it is one of not understanding how the emissivity value is determined.

Satellites don't measure light ffs, they measure microwave emissions from atmospheric oxygen.

You still seem to be using the wrong units. You are describing a body that is only in the range of 1.8 deg K, according to Wien's law.

[moon]

Absolutely correct! It's sick stuff...

Nonsense. Kids are people. You deniers would like them to be undeveloped deniers- but they're not.
You are knowingly destroying their future- and you're going to pay for that.

[Into the Night]

That's incorrect. See post #59. Global climate is a reality- whether you accept it or not.

So what is the global weather right now?

[Into the Night]

gfm7174- your perceptions are waaaaay too narrow. Expand. Chill out, get laid- enjoy the earth's climate.

Please describe "earth's climate". You say it's a nice climate. So...what's the problem?

Just don't contribute to its destruction- or the kids will come a-looking for you along with the Brit maggot.

WTF? Didn't you JUST SAY that this so-called 'Earth climate' is nice???

[Into the Night]

Nonsense. Kids are people. You deniers would like them to be undeveloped deniers- but they're not.
You are knowingly destroying their future- and you're going to pay for that.

Gee. My kids are happy and healthy. They don't worry needlessly about phantom disasters predicted by religions like yours.

[moon]

Earth has many climates. There is no such thing as a global climate, for there is no such thing as a global weather.

Yes, earth does have many climatic regions - and they form an holistic whole to present a global climate. Imagine looking at it from the moon.

[gfm7175]

Nonsense. Kids are people.

Never said they weren't.

You deniers would like them to be undeveloped deniers- but they're not.

Inversion Fallacy. This is what YOU want... YOU want them to be undeveloped deniers of science, denying the laws of thermodynamics and the stefan boltzmann law. YOU want them to be good lil' commies...

You are knowingly destroying their future- and you're going to pay for that.

Their future is just fine. There is no such thing as a "greenhouse gas"... There is no way to measure global temperature, even today.

You say that the temperature of Earth is increasing... SHOW me... Be sure to adhere to the axioms of Statistical Mathematics...

[moon]

Never said they weren't.

.

Yes you did. Agreeing with maggot was statement enough.

Inversion Fallacy.

You really are silly- although I'd bet that it feels like ' clever ' to you.