Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Gov. Newsom Puts Brakes On California’s High-Speed Rail Plan

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    ????.....isn't this an example of the government NOT doing it better?.....
    Yeah, not sure how the Erie Canal justifies what the government is doing with this high speed rail.


    Great tweet from the entrepreneur Michael Robertson about this:

    Michael Robertson (@mp3michael)
    2/13/19, 7:46 PM
    Astonishing yet predictable govt ineptness crashed the CA bullet train. Tix would be 2x as expensive as flying on Southwest yet 10x slower and cost nearly $100 billion.

    The profit incentive in the free market creates efficiency while govt services get more $ when incompetent.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    Bigdog (02-14-2019), Earl (02-14-2019)

  3. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    28,875
    Thanks
    26,636
    Thanked 14,369 Times in 9,867 Posts
    Groans
    563
    Groaned 608 Times in 575 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    I don't know what that has to do with this discussion. Read the article and rejoin the discussion
    You whine that private citizen investors won't fund your Rail project.

    Cali has the greatest wealth disparity of any State. Why won't rich libs invest in your rail project?
    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    — Joe Biden on Obama.

    Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.

    D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.

    Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,829
    Thanks
    16,888
    Thanked 21,033 Times in 14,528 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigdog View Post
    You whine that private citizen investors won't fund your Rail project.

    Cali has the greatest wealth disparity of any State. Why won't rich libs invest in your rail project?
    I don't live in California. This was Ahnold's project, and he hoped that private investment would cover the billions more he needed to complete his dream.

    You cannot rely on the private sector for infrastructure projects. Never could. That's why the govt. is so important.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  5. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    Super trains have to have their own unique tracks to run on, requiring the state to have to acquire land through imminent domain!

    This is a problem Texas is facing in trying to get their commuter Super Train up and running between Dallas and Houston.

    The dockets are so backlogged in the courts, we are still years away!

  6. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    SACRAMENTO (CBS SF) — Governor Gavin Newsom dropped a bombshell early in his State of the State address Tuesday, announcing that California would abandon the state’s plan for a high-speed rail connection between San Francisco and Los Angeles.

    During the address, he said that while he respects the vision of his predecessors Gov. Jerry Brown and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, “…there simply isn’t a path to get from Sacramento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to L.A. I wish there were.”

    “Let’s be real,” Newsom continued. “The current project, as planned, would cost too much and respectfully take too long. There’s been too little oversight and not enough transparency.”

    Newsom did say that the state would continue work to finish the high-speed rail link between Merced and Bakersfield, dismissing critics who would call it a “train to nowhere” and citing the need to reduce air pollution in the Central Valley and tap into the region’s economic potential.

    The governor said the state would continue the “regional projects north and south” with the goal of completing the Phase 1 environmental work in addition to establishing new transparency measures that would “hold contractors and consultants accountable to explain how taxpayer dollars are spent.”

    The Governor’s office later clarified that Newsom was still fully committed to building a high-speed rail connection between San Francisco and Los Angeles, despite there not currently being a path to do so.

    In 2008, voters gave the state permission to issue $10 billion dollars in bonds to finance the project, which was supposed to stretch from San Francisco to Los Angeles. Three days after Election Day, the High Speed Rail Authority released its 2008 Business Plan estimating the project would cost $33 billion with a completion date of 2020.

    For ten years, the project has been beset by ballooning costs, dozens of lawsuits, budget overruns, and scathing audit reports.

    In 2011 the HSR Authority estimated the project would cost $98 billion. After a public outcry, in 2012 the Authority scaled back plans. Instead of a dedicated high-speed rail line, the trains would be integrated into regional rail lines for $68 billion. In 2018, the cost estimate for that “blended” plan jumped to $77 billion dollars.

    All along, the HSR Authority has anticipated private investors would help defray the costs but none have stepped forward.

    Newsom also said that he would be making his Economic Development Director Lenny Mendonca as the next chair of the High Speed Rail Authority, stating that “at the end of the day, transportation and economic development must go hand in hand.”

    That segment will be completed, but there is simply not enough money for the remainder of the project. As of December 2018, the Hoover Institute estimated the HSR Authority had $12.7 billion on hand.

    “Let’s just get something done,” Newsom told the audience. “We’ll connect the revitalized Central Valley to other parts of the state, and continue to push for more federal funding and private dollars.”

    The state got $3.5 billion in federal funding to complete the Merced to Bakersfield line. If it is not complete by 2022, that money must be refunded.
    https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...jDbIE.facebook

    “I am not interested in sending $3.5 billion in federal funding that was allocated to this project back to Donald Trump,” Newsom said.

    As usual you got it wrong go do your homework and quit being a moron

  7. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vasquezrocks View Post
    Ya ... Spend 4.5 hours on the bullet train ... or fly for I.5 hours for $65 !!

    California is just SO STUPID !!!!

    Thank you ... Douche bag liberals !

    You are confused yet again the bullet train would take 2 hours and 10 minutes

  8. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    882
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 282 Times in 224 Posts
    Groans
    55
    Groaned 43 Times in 37 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    You are confused yet again the bullet train would take 2 hours and 10 minutes

    Actually they CLAIM 2 hours 40 minutes ..... In their dreams !

  9. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    You are confused yet again the bullet train would take 2 hours and 10 minutes
    Actually it’s projected at 2 hrs 40 minutes although as the article says it’s very likely it won’t be able to achieve that


    https://www.latimes.com/local/califo...729-story.html

  10. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    Actually it’s projected at 2 hrs 40 minutes although as the article says it’s very likely it won’t be able to achieve that


    https://www.latimes.com/local/califo...729-story.html
    Of course not. Kind of hard to even try to do that when it will not be built. HA!

Similar Threads

  1. Gavin Newsom Abandons SF-LA High Speed Rail
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-12-2019, 02:33 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2012, 06:58 AM
  3. Unintended Consequences of High Speed Rail
    By DamnYankee in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-16-2011, 12:21 PM
  4. At last the US wakes up to high speed rail
    By cancel2 2022 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 07:33 PM
  5. High Speed Rail! --Medved ecstatic.
    By Blackwater Lunchbreak in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-16-2009, 03:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •