Members banned from this thread: USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, Truth Detector, MAGA MAN and CFM |
Did you happen to notice Nomad's refutation of my critique consisted of "blah blah.. experts say blah blah... they know better than you..."
Therein lies the problem with typical liberal analysis of science. They lack the background and critical thinking skills to evaluate a study on their own. So they smugly agree with whatever the "experts" say, and pat themselves on the back for being so smart. Nomad still can't wrap his walnut sized brain around the very simple concept that I explained, nor will he acknowledge that solving the equation he linked doesn't result in zero.
You've done a lot of bloviating about what a math and science monster you think you are, but I notice that as of yet, you STILL have not provided ONE SPECK of proof to back up your yammering bullshit.
Sounds to me like you're ALL BLOW AND NO GO.
Either back up your bullshit with hard data, or admit that you don't know your asshole from a gopher hole.
You're just a typical Trumptard loudmouth.
Talk a lot of empty shit while never actually saying anything.
And then some other pansy-ass loser like Failor the sailor boy comes along and plays cheerleader for you.
you--> <--- Failor the sailor boy
C'MON MAN!!!!
domer76 (02-13-2019)
Once again (still), posting out of ignorance. I forgot more science by junior high than you’ve had your entire life. That’s why you’ll never amount to anything more than being a spudpeeler.
23%, stupuid fucktard. 23%.
https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/...l_energy_.html
https://www.earthobservatory.nasa.go...ance/page4.php
https://www.climate.gov/maps-data/pr...limate-forcing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_forcing
4 articles - NASA, Climate.gov, Wikipedia, Carleton College
23%, 23%, 23%, 23%
Nomad (02-13-2019)
You should. Problem is you do not understand it. The whole 23% of a retards IQ thing you have going on. What can you prove wrong right about the math in the OP? Oh, I forgot. You might be able to count to twenty if you take off your shoes. Or more, maybe less. Whatever happens with you inbreds.Originally Posted by domer76;2886295[B
No. Once again your lower than retard IQ cannot comprehend things. I said, and still do, radiant heat does not heat air directly. You cannot disprove that hence your mental midget meltdown. Of course I could have just told you 1 + 1 = 2 and you still would still try and disprove it. You google university graduate you.
Heard back from NASA yet, Einstooge? I’m sure they gave your 6th grade opinion all the consideration it deserves.
Air? A simpleton’s term. You don’t even have a clue what that means, dumbfuck. The ATMOSPHERE absorbs 23% of the incoming radiation from the sun, stupid fuck. How many times do you have to be told that?
Let’s see the scientific papers supporting you AIR theory.
https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/...l_energy_.html
https://www.earthobservatory.nasa.go...ance/page4.php
https://www.climate.gov/maps-data/pr...limate-forcing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_forcing
4 articles - NASA, Climate.gov, Wikipedia, Carleton College
23%, 23%, 23%, 23%
Why don't you ask your buttboy Sirstinksalot to do the math?
He's the one disputing the accuracy of the figures claimed by the authors of the PEER REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY referenced in the OP.
These are figures arrived at by scientists and reviewed and checked by other scientists. But this JPP Trumptard asshole NOBODY wants us to believe that we should take his word that he knows more than they do, and that he's recalculated their data and found it to be inaccurate.
But as of yet, he's done nothing but TALK.
Hasn't offered one speck of hard evidence to back up his yammering.
Typical rwnj.
C'MON MAN!!!!
C'MON MAN!!!!
domer76 (02-13-2019)
Bookmarks