Members banned from this thread: USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, Truth Detector, MAGA MAN and CFM


Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 134

Thread: Yet another looming man-made environmental disaster for dumbass Trumptards to deny...

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,506
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 9,834 Times in 6,110 Posts
    Groans
    422
    Groaned 710 Times in 658 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    ILA went one step forward, and is trolling with my bad news. How bad should someone feel, when I'm suffering, and yet I feel bad for them? Well, it's what you expect from trolls.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Jade Dragon For This Post:

    domer76 (02-11-2019)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    7,170
    Thanks
    4,088
    Thanked 3,986 Times in 2,762 Posts
    Groans
    316
    Groaned 178 Times in 173 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf_Twitler View Post
    I remember when I got laid-off in my well-pay lifelong career, and I had to just take the only jobs I could find to bring the bacon home.

    I took a job at Home Depot to keep the roof over my head and survive, while I continued to look for jobs in my career field. Drawing unemployment was just not the answer for me.

    While working there, I noticed that many people would come into the store and look for a pesticide! I would ask them,"What kind of insect are you trying to control"?

    And all too often, some thoughtless reckless careless hillbilly redneck would say, "I want to kill everything that crawls or flies"! And so that was what they would buy!

    What a world!
    Learn to code.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Sirthinksalot For This Post:

    canceled.2021.1 (02-11-2019)

  5. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    7,170
    Thanks
    4,088
    Thanked 3,986 Times in 2,762 Posts
    Groans
    316
    Groaned 178 Times in 173 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Chillingly, the total mass of insects is falling by 2.5 percent annually, the review’s authors said. If the decline continues at this rate, insects could be wiped off the face of the Earth within a century....

    “It is very rapid. In 10 years you will have a quarter less, in 50 years only half left and in 100 years you will have none,” study co-author Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, an environmental biologist at the University of Sydney, Australia, told The Guardian.
    The study claims there will be no insects left in 100 years and you find it to be credible? Did you happen to notice they calculated the rate of decline as if it was linear? I love the irony when liberals who claim to be part of "the party of science" are shown to not have even basic understanding of it.

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,547
    Thanks
    9,552
    Thanked 11,902 Times in 7,962 Posts
    Groans
    2,333
    Groaned 1,669 Times in 1,547 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirthinksalot View Post
    The study claims there will be no insects left in 100 years and you find it to be credible? Did you happen to notice they calculated the rate of decline as if it was linear? I love the irony when liberals who claim to be part of "the party of science" are shown to not have even basic understanding of it.
    Quoting myself from the OP:

    Just wait, the mindless, ignorant, parroted cries of "fake news!!!!" and "lib'rul lame-stream media conspiracy!!!!" will be forthcoming faster than you can say "ignorant, commie-loving Trumptard morons"
    Thanks for not disappointing me.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  7. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,915
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,540 Times in 9,991 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I Love America View Post
    ROFLMAO

    you got laid off

    The rest of your story is bullshit
    U got dick hair on your head

  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirthinksalot View Post
    The study claims there will be no insects left in 100 years and you find it to be credible? Did you happen to notice they calculated the rate of decline as if it was linear? I love the irony when liberals who claim to be part of "the party of science" are shown to not have even basic understanding of it.
    Ever hear of Colony Collapse Disorder, dumbshit? Once the bees are gone, we’re fucked. But stupid fucks of your level are too goddam stupid to realize that.

    https://www.epa.gov/pollinator-prote...lapse-disorder

  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade Dragon View Post
    ILA went one step forward, and is trolling with my bad news. How bad should someone feel, when I'm suffering, and yet I feel bad for them? Well, it's what you expect from trolls.
    Are you going to bitch and whine in every thread

    Let me help you. I can cure you of your self imposed prison. Take the first step to manhood and self respect

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirthinksalot View Post
    Learn to code.
    That was fucking hilarious.

    I spit out my caffeine free Diet Coke

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.1 For This Post:

    Sirthinksalot (02-11-2019)

  12. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Ever hear of Colony Collapse Disorder, dumbshit? Once the bees are gone, we’re fucked. But stupid fucks of your level are too goddam stupid to realize that.

    https://www.epa.gov/pollinator-prote...lapse-disorder
    You have given me incentive to kill bees

    I want you to die and if that does it then so be it

  13. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    7,170
    Thanks
    4,088
    Thanked 3,986 Times in 2,762 Posts
    Groans
    316
    Groaned 178 Times in 173 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Quoting myself from the OP:

    **Just wait, the mindless, ignorant, parroted cries of "fake news!!!!" and "lib'rul lame-stream media conspiracy!!!!" will be forthcoming faster than you can say "ignorant, commie-loving Trumptard morons"**

    Thanks for not disappointing me.
    I didn't parrot anything, nor say "fake news" or blah blah conspiracy. I pointed out an obvious flaw in the study that you missed because you don't understand basic math. If a very large number, (like say the biomass of insects on planet earth) decreases by 2.5% a year, it sure as shit doesn't go to zero in 100 years like your study claims.

    Since the total mass of insects on earth is a very, very large number, I will use a much smaller, round number as an example. If the total mass of insects was 1,000,000 tons and that mass was decreased by 2.5% a year for 100 years, you would end up with approximately 80,000 tons of insect mass. That would still be catastrophic. I merely pointed out a very obvious (to someone who understands math, unlike you) flaw in the study.

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Ever hear of Colony Collapse Disorder, dumbshit? Once the bees are gone, we’re fucked. But stupid fucks of your level are too goddam stupid to realize that.

    https://www.epa.gov/pollinator-prote...lapse-disorder
    I have indeed heard of it, dumbshit. It wasn't mentioned in the study and has nothing to do with my comments regarding the flaw in the study. Read my comments above if you'd care to be educated, stupid fuck.

  14. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,547
    Thanks
    9,552
    Thanked 11,902 Times in 7,962 Posts
    Groans
    2,333
    Groaned 1,669 Times in 1,547 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirthinksalot View Post
    I didn't parrot anything, nor say "fake news" or blah blah conspiracy. I pointed out an obvious flaw in the study that you missed because you don't understand basic math. If a very large number, (like say the biomass of insects on planet earth) decreases by 2.5% a year, it sure as shit doesn't go to zero in 100 years like your study claims.

    Since the total mass of insects on earth is a very, very large number, I will use a much smaller, round number as an example. If the total mass of insects was 1,000,000 tons and that mass was decreased by 2.5% a year for 100 years, you would end up with approximately 80,000 tons of insect mass. That would still be catastrophic. I merely pointed out a very obvious (to someone who understands math, unlike you) flaw in the study.
    You didn't need to spout verbatim, the kind of idiotic Trumpspeak I suggested we'd see out of your ilk, for the intent of it to be the same thing. Just like I said, some slob like you would come along and try to shovel some ignorant right-wing shit all over it.

    And that's exactly what you did.

    From the OP:

    The first global scientific review of insect population decline was published this week in the journal Biological Conservation and the findings are “shocking,” its authors said.

    More than 40 percent of insect species are dwindling globally and a third of species are endangered, concluded the PEER-REVIEWED study, which analyzed 73 historical reports on insect population declines.

    Chillingly, the total mass of insects is falling by 2.5 percent annually, the review’s authors said. If the decline continues at this rate, insects could be wiped off the face of the Earth within a century.
    Do you understand what "peer reviewed" means, Einstooge? Google it.

    If that's not beyond your abilities, that is.

    I'll give you a hint... they didn't just get some guy with a calculator to come up with some numbers then type it into an article. Several other highly qualified people fact checked it prior ti its release.

    Note also, the words could be. That could very well take into account the possibility of other mitigating factors coming into play.

    At any rate, if you think for one moment that anyone in their right mind will take the word of a NOBODY and a ZERO like you, over the word of a major scientific journal quoting the results of a PEER REVIEWED EXPERT STUDY, you're even stupider than you make yourself sound.

    As far as your supposed "math prowess" is concerned, nobody is impressed.



    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    domer76 (02-12-2019)

  16. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    7,170
    Thanks
    4,088
    Thanked 3,986 Times in 2,762 Posts
    Groans
    316
    Groaned 178 Times in 173 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    You didn't need to spout verbatim, the kind of idiotic Trumpspeak I suggested we'd see out of your ilk, for the intent of it to be the same thing. Just like I said, some slob like you would come along and try to shovel some ignorant right-wing shit all over it.

    And that's exactly what you did.

    Do you understand what "peer reviewed" means, Einstooge? Google it.

    If that's not beyond your abilities, that is.
    I do in fact understand what peer reviewed means, moron. Unlike you, I am capable of "reviewing" trivial calculations myself. A decline rate of 2.5% annually does not go to zero in a hundred years, because each year the 2.5% decline comes from a number that is 2.5% smaller than the previous year. I doubt you will be able to follow that simple logic, but hey I tried to educate you and dumbass domer.

    From your OP:
    “It is very rapid. In 10 years you will have a quarter less, in 50 years only half left and in 100 years you will have none,” study co-author Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, an environmental biologist at the University of Sydney, Australia, told The Guardian.
    Do you understand the words "will" and "none" Einstooge? Google them. We couldn't eradicate all the insects on earth if we tried.

    I'll give you a hint... they didn't just get some guy with a calculator to come up with some numbers then type it into an article. Several other highly qualified people fact checked it prior to its release.

    Note also, the words could be. That could very well take into account the possibility of other mitigating factors coming into play.

    At any rate, if you think for one moment that anyone in their right mind will take the word of a NOBODY and a ZERO like you, over the word of a major scientific journal quoting the results of a PEER REVIEWED EXPERT STUDY, you're even stupider than you make yourself sound.

    As far as your supposed "math prowess" is concerned, nobody is impressed.



    Thanks for further demonstrating your lack of understanding of how a decline rate works over time. Did you even bother to crunch the numbers in that equation you linked? It doesn't come out to zero, Einstooge. I'm more than capable of checking trivial calculations (apparently you aren't). Whatever a dumbass like you may think about me being a "nobody" my criticism of Francisco Sánchez-Bayo's erroneous math is correct. FYI, biologists aren't known for their math prowess, and in fact to earn a biology degree, one needn't go farther than basic trigonometry. Thanks again for your demonstration of a typical liberal's "understanding" of science.

  17. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,547
    Thanks
    9,552
    Thanked 11,902 Times in 7,962 Posts
    Groans
    2,333
    Groaned 1,669 Times in 1,547 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirthinksalot View Post
    I do in fact understand what peer reviewed means, moron. Unlike you, I am capable of "reviewing" trivial calculations myself. A decline rate of 2.5% annually does not go to zero in a hundred years, because each year the 2.5% decline comes from a number that is 2.5% smaller than the previous year. I doubt you will be able to follow that simple logic, but hey I tried to educate you and dumbass domer.

    From your OP:

    Do you understand the words "will" and "none" Einstooge? Google them. We couldn't eradicate all the insects on earth if we tried.

    Thanks for further demonstrating your lack of understanding of how a decline rate works over time. Did you even bother to crunch the numbers in that equation you linked? It doesn't come out to zero, Einstooge. I'm more than capable of checking trivial calculations (apparently you aren't). Whatever a dumbass like you may think about me being a "nobody" my criticism of Francisco Sánchez-Bayo's erroneous math is correct. FYI, biologists aren't known for their math prowess, and in fact to earn a biology degree, one needn't go farther than basic trigonometry. Thanks again for your demonstration of a typical liberal's "understanding" of science.
    All I see out of you is yet another right-wing dumbfuck running his fat, jerk-ass mouth and bloviating about his supposed expertise while not backing it up with a shred of proof.

    The study in question was reviewed by other scientists and experts in various scientific fields, all of whom I'm quite certain, have math skills light years above any you claim to possess.

    Therefore, the very notion that anyone outside your own peer group of fellow, low-foreheaded apes and drooling knuckle-draggers would take your word on the subject above theirs, is so ridiculous it just further proves your abject level of simple-minded, bone-headed ignorance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirstinksalot
    ...because each year the 2.5% decline comes from a number that is 2.5% smaller than the previous year. I doubt you will be able to follow that simple logic...
    Get over yourself, idiot. Your self-proclaimed "scary awesome math skillz" are nothing more impressive than the understanding of how to calculate simple interest, but in reverse.

    BFD.

    That still doesn't make your idiotic nonsense any more credible.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  18. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,582
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Honest questions here

    Do liberals see any connection between a move towards a “great society” and man-made global warming?

    Seriously. Have you considered the hypocrisy of your platforms? You want to take from the rich, allowing the poor and middle class to have a better living conditions

    An undeniable fact of the matter is poor people in this country have far larger homes then the poor people in other countries. Poor people here have more technology in their homes too.

    How can we improve man made global warming by allowing the poor to live even better? Every program you implement that takes from the rich (who are few in numbers) and distributes to the poor is going to increase consumption, which increases production, which increases pollution.

    Every time the economy slows – you will see democrats wanting to pump money into the economy to get people spending again. Spending – on vacations, technology, gas, travel, larger mortgages for bigger homes, etc, etc. Our economic system requires debt based spending as we need to grow GDP to minimize the ratio to foreign held debt.

  19. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirthinksalot View Post
    I do in fact understand what peer reviewed means, moron. Unlike you, I am capable of "reviewing" trivial calculations myself. A decline rate of 2.5% annually does not go to zero in a hundred years, because each year the 2.5% decline comes from a number that is 2.5% smaller than the previous year. I doubt you will be able to follow that simple logic, but hey I tried to educate you and dumbass domer.

    From your OP:


    Do you understand the words "will" and "none" Einstooge? Google them. We couldn't eradicate all the insects on earth if we tried.



    Thanks for further demonstrating your lack of understanding of how a decline rate works over time. Did you even bother to crunch the numbers in that equation you linked? It doesn't come out to zero, Einstooge. I'm more than capable of checking trivial calculations (apparently you aren't). Whatever a dumbass like you may think about me being a "nobody" my criticism of Francisco Sánchez-Bayo's erroneous math is correct. FYI, biologists aren't known for their math prowess, and in fact to earn a biology degree, one needn't go farther than basic trigonometry. Thanks again for your demonstration of a typical liberal's "understanding" of science.
    You sir are correct. Democrats are easily misled by anything more than 1 + 1.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 110
    Last Post: 02-09-2019, 09:24 AM
  2. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-27-2018, 12:56 PM
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-27-2018, 12:27 PM
  4. APP - another environmental disaster brought on my stupidity and seeking money
    By Don Quixote in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-19-2013, 06:27 PM
  5. If Tampa is hit, will the GOP deny the city disaster aid?
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-23-2012, 07:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •