Bill Nye crushes MILLENIALS' belief & CERTITUDE that they can choose to live on MARS

[moon]

. Ipse dixit

Nice one.

[Nordberg]

The climate prediction computer models have consistently failed. It's not real science. It might as well be phrenology or astrology.

While some of the data is questionable, ... the most egregious violation of scientific methodology is the substitution of instrument data for proxy data.

No, the models have not failed. https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2018/0...dels-accuracy/ They are quite accurate. There are lots of variables in the equation that eliminate absolute precision, but using the models on the past weather conditions has shown they were pretty accurate in predicting what happened.

[cancel2 2022]

One model, hidden behind a paywall, ... out of a hundred. You can't even tell if the model is still working 7 years after the article was published, ... can you?

The Guardian is a huge propagandist for climate alarmism, you cannot trust anything they print especially if it is written by a conman like Dana Nuccitelli.

[cancel2 2022]

So, you have no evidence to support your claim. You only have the complaint that you don't want to pay to look at my evidence that shows models are accurate.

- Your math sucks.


Based on the increase in global temperatures since 2013, I would say the model is probably currently predicting lower temperatures than we are seeing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instru...re_Anomaly.svg

But, I am still waiting (not holding my breath) for you to provide your evidence that the models have failed. Ipse dixit seems to be the only thing you are capable of.

Good grief, only the truly deluded believe that CMIP5 models are accurate.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/...must-be-wrong/

[moon]

That's your ipse dipshit revealing itself again, maggot.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The Guardian links to the actual scientific article published in a scientific journal. You can't dispute the facts so are left with resorting to an ad hominem fallacy by claiming the Guardian is a propagandist. Pay the 8.99 for the article and point out where it is wrong. But you won't do that because you have nothing but idiocy.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Good grief, only the truly deluded believe that CMIP5 models are accurate.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/...must-be-wrong/

It is now 2019. More data. More evidence showing the climate models are closer than Spencer claims in 2013. The 5 year averages of HadCrut currently show a .7 degree temperature increase in 2018.
https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/t...e/HadCRUT4.pdf

The graph Spencer uses shows it would be about a .7 degree temperature increase in 2018.

Are you arguing that Spencer's data is wrong about the prediction for 2018?

[Bigdog]

The Guardian links to the actual scientific article published in a scientific journal. You can't dispute the facts so are left with resorting to an ad hominem fallacy by claiming the Guardian is a propagandist. Pay the 8.99 for the article and point out where it is wrong. But you won't do that because you have nothing but idiocy.

^^^^^
Proof it is about the business model, ... not the climate model.




Average of 102 IPCC computer models

[zymurgy]

Conservatives hate skepticism; they want everything taught in schools to be accepted as gospel. Why do you think so many fundies prefer to homeschool?

conservatives are skeptical of central planning

and they are fond of homeschooling because they believe in personal responsibility. how horrible a concept that is for your ilk.

[Truth Detector]

Conservatives hate skepticism; they want everything taught in schools to be accepted as gospel. Why do you think so many fundies prefer to homeschool?

I R O N Y!!!!

[Truth Detector]

What is with bigdog titles, and them being such retarded shit?

Buy a mirror.

[Truth Detector]

She means in schooling before college. Most Conservatives don't make it past high school.

Do you have any proof to that asinine claim? It is OBVIOUS that even when liberals get through college, they've learned nothing useful.

Of course, you're a dullard who thinks unconstitutional Government redistribution schemes help people. That's inane.

[Truth Detector]

I do not think ........

First honest thing you have posted on the forum snowflake.

[Truth Detector]

conservatives are skeptical of central planning

and they are fond of homeschooling because they believe in personal responsibility. how horrible a concept that is for your ilk.

Personal responsibility is the single biggest threat to liberal dogma and ideology.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

^^^^^
Proof it is about the business model, ... not the climate model.




Average of 102 IPCC computer models

I see you are attempting to cherry pick data, make a fatal mistake of comparing upper atmosphere with surface temperatures and then not include the last 3 years.

You completely ignore the HADCRUT surface temperatures that show the warming is almost dead on with the models.

By attempting to misuse data, you haven't proved anything wrong. You have only undermined your own argument because it shows you to not understanding basic science.