Members banned from this thread: cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, canceled.2021.3 and Bigdog


Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Climate science the most revered hard science in human history.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default Climate science the most revered hard science in human history.


  2. The Following User Groans At Micawber For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-06-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Paris Agreement: essential elements

    The Paris Agreement builds upon the Convention and for the first time brings all nations into a common cause to undertake ambitious efforts to combat climate change and adapt to its effects, with enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so. As such, it charts a new course in the global climate effort.

    The Paris Agreement central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Additionally, the agreement aims to strengthen the ability of countries to deal with the impacts of climate change. To reach these ambitious goals, appropriate financial flows, a new technology framework and an enhanced capacity building framework will be put in place, thus supporting action by developing countries and the most vulnerable countries, in line with their own national objectives. The Agreement also provides for enhanced transparency of action and support through a more robust transparency framework. Further information on key aspects of the Agreement can be found here.

    Nationally determined contributions

    The Paris Agreement requires all Parties to put forward their best efforts through nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and to strengthen these efforts in the years ahead. This includes requirements that all Parties report regularly on their emissions and on their implementation efforts.

    Further information on NDCs can be found here.

    In 2018, Parties will take stock of the collective efforts in relation to progress towards the goal set in the Paris Agreement and to inform the preparation of NDCs.

    There will also be a global stocktake every 5 years to assess the collective progress towards achieving the purpose of the Agreement and to inform further individual actions by Parties.

    Status of ratification

    The Paris Agreement entered into force on 4 November 2016, thirty days after the date on which at least 55 Parties to the Convention accounting in total for at least an estimated 55 % of the total global greenhouse gas emissions have deposited their instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Depositary.

    Information on the status of ratification can be found here:

  4. The Following User Groans At Micawber For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-07-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default


    Of course! Do you know how we know that? CAPITALISTS, left, middle center are their new GODS! Ask Allstate. Ask GEICO. Ask the state of FLORIDA who signed on to all the revised US FLOOD MAPS. You know Florida, where RICK SCOTT, REP, governor, now one of America's 100 Senators, told state employees there were not allowed to say, write or type CLIMATE CHANGE or even 'CLIMATE (or weather) MITIGATION'. You know Florida, where DiSantis, REP governor barely squeaked out a win (or not). I wonder if he'll allow state emloyees to say or type CLIMATE CHANGE.
    Last edited by Centerleftfl; 02-06-2019 at 11:56 PM.
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  6. The Following User Groans At Centerleftfl For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-07-2019)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Centerleftfl View Post
    Of course! Do you know how we know that? CAPITALISTS, left, middle center are their new GODS! Ask Allstate. Ask GEICO. Ask the state of FLORIDA who signed on to all the revised US FLOOD MAPS.

    You know Florida, where RICK SCOTT, REP, governor, now one of America's 100 Senators, told state employees there were not allowed to say, write or type CLIMATE CHANGE or even 'CLIMATE (or weather) MITIGATION'. You know Florida, where DiSantis, REP govenor barely squeaked out a win (or not).
    It's funny all the decision makers are on board, the ones who plan where to spend the big money long term, and these ninnys
    think they know better.

  8. The Following User Groans At Micawber For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-07-2019)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    thread title made me LOL

    The climate models in CIMP5 are hot by over 30% of the supposed anthropogenic signal! Monckton has shown where there error occurs. You fucking people are nuts.

    Climate science fails to distinguish between natural and anthropogenic sources of warming. It's confirmation bias on steroids.

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Exxon believes in climate science. We FORCED them to.

  11. The Following User Groans At Micawber For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-07-2019)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    It's funny all the decision makers are on board, the ones who plan where to spend the big money long term, and these ninnys
    think they know better.
    The in your face LIES and denial are extraordinary. And these fucking fools down here still voted for them. I do NOT get it. I never will. How the hell does a PENINSULA, the entire state of Florida, with high tides now taking out houses and running into streets, have a fucking GOVERNOR who denies the CLIMATE HAS CHANGED! Now he's a Senator and inflicted on a nation.

    Scott at a MAGA party at Mar A Lago...

    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,766
    Thanks
    6,480
    Thanked 11,420 Times in 7,539 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfoil View Post
    thread title made me LOL
    Me too. "Hard science". But the links were even funnier. lol

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to anonymoose For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-07-2019)

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,766
    Thanks
    6,480
    Thanked 11,420 Times in 7,539 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Exxon believes in climate science. We FORCED them to.
    Marketing. Whatever happened to those lawsuits against ExxonMobile for changing the weather? lol

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to anonymoose For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (02-07-2019)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  18. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,707
    Thanks
    6,598
    Thanked 12,136 Times in 9,664 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

Similar Threads

  1. science proves human effected GW
    By evince in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 03-14-2019, 11:10 AM
  2. Climate science consensus of ALL climate scientists
    By Micawber in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-31-2019, 09:32 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-26-2018, 08:40 PM
  4. No science in climate science. But you already knew that.
    By Celticguy in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-10-2017, 09:47 PM
  5. Science says ice melt is not caused by human activity
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-04-2014, 01:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •