Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 55

Thread: One Kills The Other Cripples

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I could repeat myself, but I think it would be useless.
    You could do for the cause you claim to support but you refuse. Sign of a coward.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    You could do for the cause you claim to support but you refuse. Sign of a coward.
    hahaha ... If I say one thing, ... then you want to spin it around and construe it as something else, we're both wasting our time. Right?

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    57,166
    Thanks
    25,212
    Thanked 20,670 Times in 16,595 Posts
    Groans
    129
    Groaned 1,435 Times in 1,357 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    If CFM wants to abort HIS kids, why should Jack care? That's CFM's business.
    You did say "killing their kids"...that's the point. they are children....but OK...‘ it is "legal".....pink lights in NY say just about anytime...what's next?
    (we'd have less children/people if they added some more wall, you know

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    hahaha ... If I say one thing, ... then you want to spin it around and construe it as something else, we're both wasting our time. Right?
    You said we need less people. I gave a way for the person saying it to make it one less and you refused.

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    23,334
    Thanks
    6,344
    Thanked 16,632 Times in 11,620 Posts
    Groans
    1,236
    Groaned 513 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    You did say "killing their kids"...that's the point. they are children....but OK...‘ it is "legal".....pink lights in NY say just about anytime...what's next?
    (we'd have less children/people if they added some more wall, you know

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eagle_Eye For This Post:

    Flanders (02-05-2019), TOP (02-05-2019)

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default



    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    The people that are 'HERE' ... are here.
    The people that are 'NOT HERE' ... aren't.


    Thumbs up or thumbs down on newborns surviving? (via Pixabay)

    To Jack: I assume you would vote thumbs up on people who are here.


    The Democratic Party seems to be willing to protect not just late-term abortions, but killing of babies who survive the attempt on their lives. Governor Ralph Northam's cold-blooded explanation of allowing parents and doctors to discuss whether or not to finish off the victim, as part of the bill sponsored by Democrat Kathy Tran, shocked most people who heard about it – those who don't rely on the mainstream media.

    Yesterday, Republican Senator Ben Sasse introduced a bill, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 130), that would require the provision of medical services to babies born alive after attempted killing of them in utero, and sought "unanimous consent" – a Senate procedure to substitute for a vote on measures regarded as non-controversial – but the Democrats found a hatchet woman to prevent that, while sparing her colleagues from individually voting in favor of infanticide. Kimberly Leonard reports in the Washington Examiner:

    Senate Democrats on Monday blocked an effort to pass legislation clarifying that babies who survive attempted abortions must receive medical care.

    Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., rejected the motion to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, authored by Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., and co-sponsored by other Republicans. Sasse had sought to pass the bill via unanimous consent, meaning that one senator could stop it by objecting.

    "You're either for babies or you're defending infanticide," Sasse said before the vote. "That's literally what this bill is about."

    Murray said in objecting to the call for unanimous consent the U.S. already had laws against infanticide, and accused Sasse of misrepresenting the purpose of his legislation.

    Mitch McConnell seems on board, so Murray's move will not exempt her Senate colleagues from taking a position on infanticide. They will have to choose between unquestioning support for the abortion industry and the protection of the life of an innocent baby already born. Given the fact that only a tiny minority of Americans support third-trimester abortions (13% most recently), they are identifying themselves as part of a fringe group.


    February 5, 2019
    Senate Dems block bill requiring medical care for abortion survivors
    By Thomas Lifson

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...survivors.html
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    "To Jack: I assume you would vote thumbs up on people who are here."

    Jack feels people have a Right to do what they want with their fetuses. I was unaware that you wanted Government to make decisions for people? It seems like a call made by the Individuals involved.

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,920
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,834 Times in 17,265 Posts
    Groans
    5,348
    Groaned 4,601 Times in 4,278 Posts

    Default

    The rightys and Christians are just pro-birth, not pro-life. They want a person they do not know anything about to have a baby, regardless if she were raped, it was done by a family member or they just are unable to take care of it. The Pro birthers should develop a huge fund to take care of these kids. They should take care of their medical care and education too. Then you would have a much smaller abortion rate.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    Aimée (02-13-2019), Jack (02-05-2019)

  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The rightys and Christians are just pro-birth, not pro-life. They want a person they do not know anything about to have a baby, regardless if she were raped, it was done by a family member or they just are unable to take care of it. The Pro birthers should develop a huge fund to take care of these kids. They should take care of their medical care and education too. Then you would have a much smaller abortion rate.
    Oh yes. I agree. All these aborted fetuses should be born and given to people who support their birth. All expenses, no matter what deformities they have, should be the responsibility of these proponents. NO GOVERNMENT help for these people.

    And ... for people like CFM, just black crack babies for him.

  12. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    "To Jack: I assume you would vote thumbs up on people who are here."

    Jack feels people have a Right to do what they want with their fetuses. I was unaware that you wanted Government to make decisions for people? It seems like a call made by the Individuals involved.
    You mean like whether or not they have to buy healthcare?

    You mean like the government deciding to force those told to butt out of a woman's choice when she can't afford the choice SHE makes?

  13. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    You mean like whether or not they have to buy healthcare?

    You mean like the government deciding to force those told to butt out of a woman's choice when she can't afford the choice SHE makes?
    Like CFM having to raise a dozen black crack babies, ... that will never leave home. (hahahahahahahahahahaha)

  14. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Oh yes. I agree. All these aborted fetuses should be born and given to people who support their birth. All expenses, no matter what deformities they have, should be the responsibility of these proponents. NO GOVERNMENT help for these people.

    And ... for people like CFM, just black crack babies for him.
    Unlike you and Nordberg, I'm pro personal responsibility. You can't take the very action that produces pregnancy then kill the result because it's inconvenient to you then claim it's being responsible.

    Do you think you're man enough to make me support what you claim you can force on me?

  15. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Like CFM having to raise a dozen black crack babies, ... that will never leave home. (hahahahahahahahahahaha)
    When you can enforce your claim that's what you'd have me do, let me know.

  16. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Unlike you and Nordberg, I'm pro personal responsibility. You can't take the very action that produces pregnancy then kill the result because it's inconvenient to you then claim it's being responsible.

    Do you think you're man enough to make me support what you claim you can force on me?
    You will have to change their diapers. (I LOVE thinking about that)

  17. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    When you can enforce your claim that's what you'd have me do, let me know.
    And buy all their clothes.

Similar Threads

  1. Gun Nut KILLS Daughter
    By zappasguitar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 198
    Last Post: 01-04-2016, 07:44 PM
  2. gun nut kills kid, is it SYG????
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-07-2014, 01:33 PM
  3. Hijacker kills, and kills, and kills again
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2013, 06:59 PM
  4. VAT tax kills jobs
    By Blackwater Lunchbreak in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-04-2010, 04:49 PM
  5. Viagra kills!!!!
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-27-2009, 07:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •