Cult of White Privilege IS EthnoMasochism

[StoneByStone]

Any thoughts on why this is?

[canceled.2021.3]

I love my white privilege

Just the other day a negro and I both reached for the last item on a shelf. I immediately pulled out my White Privilege card and took it.

[CFM]

I love my white privilege

Just the other day a negro and I both reached for the last item on a shelf. I immediately pulled out my White Privilege card and took it.

Me, too.

Last time I applied for a position, I didn't waste my time sending in a cover letter, resume, references, or any other item normally submitted. I sent a letter with two words on it. It said "I'm white".

[Truth Detector]

I love my white privilege

Just the other day a negro and I both reached for the last item on a shelf. I immediately pulled out my White Privilege card and took it.

[Jack]

Any thoughts on why this is?

Just off the top of my head here, without giving it much thought, I think Whites see themselves as 'Conquerors of the World'. They've carved up the World, created Borders, given their Language to the Conquered, and claimed the 'Local Wealth' as their own.
Now, Whites are pretty well off and think, "Hey, maybe we should give some back?"

[StoneByStone]

Just off the top of my head here, without giving it much thought, I think Whites see themselves as 'Conquerors of the World'. They've carved up the World, created Borders, given their Language to the Conquered, and claimed the 'Local Wealth' as their own.
Now, Whites are pretty well off and think, "Hey, maybe we should give some back?"

I think that's a good theory for why Whites try to make the world a better place, like the way we eliminated slavery all over the world. But it doesn't explain why we literally destroy our own countries for other races. It doesn't explain why we see something as bad if it's "too white" and fight to give ourselves systematic disadvantages.

[PoliTalker]

Hello StoneByStone,

I think that's a good theory for why Whites try to make the world a better place, like the way we eliminated slavery all over the world. But it doesn't explain why we literally destroy our own countries for other races.

I don't think we've done that.

It doesn't explain why we see something as bad if it's "too white"

We see that as bad because it supports automatic privileges for being white instead of equal chance for all to flourish and succeed.

and fight to give ourselves systematic disadvantages.

I don't understand how the concept of equality is a disadvantage for anyone.

[StoneByStone]

I don't think we've done that.

We're in the process of it. Mass non-white immigration and anti-white state racism are still happening. We're also just accepting the social and media racism Whites now have to deal with. The results have been lower living standards for Whites.
Keep in mind that multiracialism never works, and hated minorities usually face violent persecution. So what's going to happen when Whites are the minority in our own countries?

We see that as bad because it supports automatic privileges for being white instead of equal chance for all to flourish and succeed.

So how come we don't hear complaints about how Hollywood is "too Jewish" or STEM jobs are "too Asian" or any of the other fields where a non-white group is overrepresented?
And this is America, where white is the majority. OF COURSE most fields will have a white majority. You don't go to Africa and say "damn, these governments are way too black."

I don't understand how the concept of equality is a disadvantage for anyone.

We don't have equality when affirmative action exists. When only Whites don't have freedom of association. When the media is grooming society to view everything we do as racist. These are some of the disadvantages.

Is it anti-white; or is it anti-discriminatory...

I would say it's anti-white because it blames white people for discrimination that isn't there. The media also ONLY talks about white racism, which is also propaganda.
The narrative being constructed here is that Whites are racists. Movies like "Get Out" take it a step further and say the white people you know who have black friends and even date black people, well they're racist too. It's this whole "White Feminism" bullshit.
Basically, the establishment want us to think the only good white person is a white person who accepts their racism and is working every day to harness the power of guilt to be a better POC ally.

[PoliTalker]

Hello StoneByStone,

We're in the process of it. Mass non-white immigration and anti-white state racism are still happening. We're also just accepting the social and media racism Whites now have to deal with. The results have been lower living standards for Whites.

I don't see that at all. My living standard is the same whether some immigrants are allowed to participate in our economy or not.

Keep in mind that multiracialism never works, and hated minorities usually face violent persecution. So what's going to happen when Whites are the minority in our own countries?

Nothing is going to happen. Life will go on, all will be fine, even with multiracialism.

So how come we don't hear complaints about how Hollywood is "too Jewish" or STEM jobs are "too Asian" or any of the other fields where a non-white group is overrepresented?

In case you have not noticed, we are trying to catch up because blacks have been so oppressed by slavery and discrimination. The slaves didn't ask to be brought here.

And this is America, where white is the majority. OF COURSE most fields will have a white majority. You don't go to Africa and say "damn, these governments are way too black."

I really don't care who has greater numbers of individuals. But I would like to see a level playing field which would result in our various races being proportionally represented in most areas of the economy.

We don't have equality when affirmative action exists. When only Whites don't have freedom of association. When the media is grooming society to view everything we do as racist.

Total exaggeration.

These are some of the disadvantages.

It hasn't hurt me.

I would say it's anti-white because it blames white people for discrimination that isn't there.

That is a matter of perception.

The media also ONLY talks about white racism, which is also propaganda.

It is not propaganda if it is verified fact.

The narrative being constructed here is that Whites are racists.

No, I don't get that. It is up to each individual how they think about racism.

Basically, the establishment want us to think the only good white person is a white person who accepts their racism and is working every day to harness the power of guilt to be a better POC ally.

What is a POC ally?

And I totally do not see 'the establishment want us to think the only good white person is a white person who accepts their racism and is working every day to harness the power of guilt.' What I see is institutions which reflect our Constitution, our diverse culture, and the idea that all are created equal. And that logically seems like the only fair way to do it.

[tinfoil]

Just off the top of my head here, without giving it much thought, I think Whites see themselves as 'Conquerors of the World'. They've carved up the World, created Borders, given their Language to the Conquered, and claimed the 'Local Wealth' as their own.
Now, Whites are pretty well off and think, "Hey, maybe we should give some back?"

Africans didn't have abstract concepts in their language so they were doomed to technological deadends because they had no concept of precision which could be relayed between each other. White people simply have better language and were able to pass on technological advances to future generations.

Written vs oral language: How do they differ?

[Jack]

Africans didn't have abstract concepts in their language so they were doomed to technological deadends because they had no concept of precision which could be relayed between each other. White people simply have better language and were able to pass on technological advances to future generations.

Written vs oral language: How do they differ?

If you say so.

[kudzu]

Africans didn't have abstract concepts in their language so they were doomed to technological deadends because they had no concept of precision which could be relayed between each other. White people simply have better language and were able to pass on technological advances to future generations.

Written vs oral language: How do they differ?

What? Who says they don't have abstract concepts?

[tinfoil]

What? Who says they don't have abstract concepts?

Pre colonial Africa. I should have been more precise. Sorry. I encountered a video about the subject. The research originates with this guy
http://www.lulu.com/shop/dr-gedaliah...t-1646432.html

Many abstract concepts were discovered missing when attempts to translate and build a dictionary were made. Concepts like time. There was no word for the past, the future. There was no complex number system. They had oral language only. Caucasians chose to develop in regions that required greater precision to convey information. For example the researchers asked early natives how they could describe a coconut was halfway up in a tree, but there was only a way to say it was up in the tree. Cuacasians developed more precise language because they needed to describe landscapes and feature more wide ranging than plains and grasslands that are relatively featureless. I think it's simply a matter of one group doing more of something and developing traits that result. Plains dwellers had less use for highly descriptive language and had better intuitive communication techniques. The differences are evident in the higher rates of self-consciousness and neurosis among caucasians compared to africans.

[Sirthinksalot]

No idea why, but the video provided an interesting take.

[Vasquezrocks]

Just another anger black man .....