Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: SCOTUS allows transgender military ban to go into effect

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default SCOTUS allows transgender military ban to go into effect

    he Supreme Court allowed President Donald Trump's transgender military ban to go into effect on Tuesday, dealing a blow to LGBT activists who call the ban cruel and irrational.
    In an unsigned 5-4 order, the justices took no stance on the legality of the ban, first proposed in a surprise tweet by Trump in 2017, but Tuesday's action allows it to take effect while lower courts hear additional arguments.

    n a statement released after the Supreme Court action, the Pentagon sought to clarify that its policy is not a ban on all transgender persons from the military.

    "As always, we treat all transgender persons with respect and dignity. (The Department of Defense's) proposed policy is NOT a ban on service by transgender persons. It is critical that DoD be permitted to implement personnel policies that it determines are necessary to ensure the most lethal and combat effective fighting force in the world. DoD's proposed policy is based on professional military judgment and will ensure that the U.S. Armed Forces remain the most lethal and combat effective fighting force in the world," Lt. Col. Carla Gleason, a Pentagon spokesperson, told CNN.

    In July 2017, Trump surprised military leaders by tweeting,
    "After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military," Trump said. "Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail."
    ho is affected by SCOTUS decision?
    After Trump called for a ban on transgender persons serving in the military, Mattis directed Patrick Shanahan, the then-deputy secretary of defense and now-acting Secretary of Defense, and vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Paul Selva to develop the implementation plan.
    Most transgender persons are now disqualified from military service except:

    Service members who have been stable for three years in their biological sex prior to joining the military -- meaning 36 months after completion of surgery and hormone treatments.

    Service members diagnosed with "gender dysphoria" after joining the military can stay in the military if they don't require a change of gender and remain deployable. Gender dysphoria involves a conflict between a person's physical or assigned gender and the gender with which the person identifies, according to the American Psychiatric Association.

    Service members who were diagnosed with "gender dysphoria" before the effective date of the policy can still serve and receive medical treatment.

    Transgender persons without a gender dysphoria diagnosis or history can serve in their birth sex.

    The Defense Department can issue waivers on a case-by-case basis.
    The policy also states that transgender persons serving who require gender reassignment surgery or hormonal treatment during their service would be disqualified due to their inability to be deployed for a period longer than 12 months.
    By the government's own numbers in 2016, there were approximately 8,980 Service members that identify as transgender. During the Obama administration, 937 members were diagnosed with gender dysphoria and began or completed their transition.

    Reaction to SCOTUS decision
    Shortly after the court's order, Speaker of the House Nancy
    Pelosi tweeted that the policy was "purpose-built to humiliate brave men & women seeking to serve their country."
    "Deeply concerning that #SCOTUS is allowing his ban to proceed for now,"
    The Justice Department applauded the order, saying in a statement that the Defense Department "has the authority to create and implement personnel policies it has determined are necessary to best defend our nation."

    Due to lower courts issuing nationwide injunctions, our military had been forced to maintain a prior policy that poses a risk to military effectiveness and lethality for over a year," Kerri Kupec, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department said in a statement. "We will continue to defend in the courts the authority and ability of the Pentagon to ensure the safety and security of the American people."
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/22/polit...MlCf-1tiyQOqhc

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default


Similar Threads

  1. transgender tenant....
    By PostmodernProphet in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-23-2018, 03:41 PM
  2. Very lengthy list of SCOTUS decisions overturned by later SCOTUS
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-11-2018, 07:24 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-10-2018, 04:49 PM
  4. Replies: 126
    Last Post: 08-03-2017, 05:06 AM
  5. Replies: 192
    Last Post: 07-29-2017, 05:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •