New Paper: Modern Warming Was Driven By ‘Primarily Natural’ Factors.

[cancel2 2022]

An analysis published in the journal Atmospheric and Climate Sciences by 4 climate scientists reveals the 1880-2013 temperature changes fit “perfectly” (0.9 correlation) into a calculation utilizing 15,295 periodic functions of natural variation.

The authors claim this affirms that the non-anthropogenic “major climate factors” (i.e., solar-cloud and ENSO forcing) can still be considered the “main reason” driving modern warming (Lakshmi and Tiari, 2015; Hassan et al., 2016; McLean, 2014; Yeo and Kim, 2015; Wielicki et al., 2002; Douglass and Knox, 2014; Sejrup et al., 2010; Large and Yeager, 2012; Irvine, 2015; Cess and Udelhofen, 2003; Clark, 2010; Ogurtsov et al., 2017; Fleming, 2018; Zherebtsov et al., 2019).

Mao, Tan, Chen, and Fan (2019) effectively suggest we humans do not exert fundamental control over the Earth’s climate-modulating “Ocean Stabilization Machine”.

Consequently, their statistical analysis further indicates a global cooling trend has recently begun, and the overall decline in global temperature will precisely reach −0.6051˚C below the long-term average in the year 2111.

The full paper can been found here: https://file.scirp.org/pdf/ACS_2019010914482656.pdf

[Darth Omar]

I don’t know about anyone else but I’m ready for a little global warming lol.

[Bigdog]

Mao, Tan, Chen, and Fan (2019) effectively suggest we humans do not exert fundamental control over the Earth’s climate-modulating “Ocean Stabilization Machine”.

Common sense science prevails over political fear mongering propaganda.

[kudzu]

Common sense science prevails over political fear mongering propaganda.

Really? That's a surprise to me.

[cancel2 2022]

Really? That's a surprise to me.

The fact that you're surprised is no surprise to me.

[dukkha]

the sun did it

[kudzu]

The fact that you're surprised is no surprise to me.

So give the polluters free reign.

[Centerleftfl]

Do you just assume WE WON'T LOOK? Or you just DON'T THINK TO LOOK? Which is it? It's a binary choice.

Let me explain in case you DON'T UNDERSTAND the words below. This 'outfit' likely publishes 'crap' that other legitimate scientific, UN-PEER reviewed entities won't touch or know is junk science or for which there is no proof for. THEY CHARGE MONEY TO BE PUBLISHED. "A predatory open source publisher." Now I don't know about you, but a 'normal person' who actually wants to KNOW SHIT would likely find the credibility of of whatever the hell this is QUESTIONABLE.

But that's just me. I've cp'd a portion. It gets better folks, you should read the link. How the hell do these people even find this shit? Which RW SHIT SITE published it that they just happen upon?

Scientific Research Publishing - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Research_Publishing


Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP) is an academic publisher of presumably peer-reviewed open-access electronic journals, conference proceedings, and scientific anthologies of questionable quality. Although it has an address in southern California, in reality it is a "Chinese operation".

Key he company has been accused of being a predatory open access publisher^[6] and of using email spam to solicit papers for submission.^[4] In 2014 there was a mass resignation of the editorial board of one of the company's journals, with the outgoing Editor-in-Chief saying of the publisher "For them it was only about making money. We were simply their 'front'."^[7]‎: ‎Huaibei Zhou
Founded‎: ‎2007

[Legion]

That's a surprise to me.

It would be, because God damn, you're stupid.

You have zero credibility.

[Legion]

So give the polluters free reign.

If anyone suggested that, you'd have a point.

Since nobody did, you don't.

God damn, you're stupid.

You have zero credibility.

[Legion]

DO YOU JUST ASSUME WE WON'T LOOK? Or you just DON'T THINK TO LOOK? Which is it? This is a binary choice. Let me explain in case you DON'T UNDERSTAND the text below. This 'outfit' likely publishes 'crap' that other legitimate scientific, UN-PEER reviewed entities won't touch or know is junk science or for which there is no proof for. "A predatory open source publisher." Now I don't know about you, but a 'normal person' who actually wants to KNOW SHIT would likely find the credibility of of whatever the hell this is QUESTIONABLE. But that's just me. How the hell do you people even find this shit? Scientific Research Publishing - Wikipedia Scientific Research Publishing is an academic publisher of presumably peer-reviewed open-access electronic journals, conference proceedings, and scientific anthologies of questionable quality. Although it has an address in southern California, in reality it is a "Chinese operation". The company has been accused of being a predatory open access publisher and of using email spam to solicit papers for submission. In 2014 there was a mass resignation of the editorial board of one of the company's journals, with the outgoing Editor-in-Chief saying of the publisher "For them it was only about making money. We were simply their 'front'."‎: ‎Huaibei Zhou Founded‎: ‎2007

Even Zappacrite knows that attacking a source without factual rebuttal is a logical fallacy.

Facts are facts. Numbers don't change depending on which website they happen to come from. But here you are, attacking the source once more. If you had anything more substantial, you'd post it.

[cancel2 2022]

So give the polluters free reign.

What a load of crap, who said anything about pollution?

[cancel2 2022]

Do you just assume WE WON'T LOOK? Or you just DON'T THINK TO LOOK? Which is it? It's a binary choice.

Let me explain in case you DON'T UNDERSTAND the words below. This 'outfit' likely publishes 'crap' that other legitimate scientific, UN-PEER reviewed entities won't touch or know is junk science or for which there is no proof for. THEY CHARGE MONEY TO BE PUBLISHED. "A predatory open source publisher." Now I don't know about you, but a 'normal person' who actually wants to KNOW SHIT would likely find the credibility of of whatever the hell this is QUESTIONABLE.

But that's just me. I've cp'd a portion. It gets better folks, you should read the link. How the hell do these people even find this shit? Which RW SHIT SITE published it that they just happen upon?

Scientific Research Publishing - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Research_Publishing


Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP) is an academic publisher of presumably peer-reviewed open-access electronic journals, conference proceedings, and scientific anthologies of questionable quality. Although it has an address in southern California, in reality it is a "Chinese operation".

Key he company has been accused of being a predatory open access publisher^[6] and of using email spam to solicit papers for submission.^[4] In 2014 there was a mass resignation of the editorial board of one of the company's journals, with the outgoing Editor-in-Chief saying of the publisher "For them it was only about making money. We were simply their 'front'."^[7]‎: ‎Huaibei Zhou
Founded‎: ‎2007

You're an arsehole, and I don't need that to be peer reviewed!

[Centerleftfl]

It would be, because God damn, you're stupid.

You have zero credibility.

Now that's 'rich'.

[cancel2 2022]

Even Zappacrite knows that attacking a source without factual rebuttal is a logical fallacy.

Well he can't, so he just does a Desh instead, even down to using Wiki! Scientific Research Publishing is one of several websites that provide open access to papers rather than charging exorbitant fees like Elsevier.