Buzzfeed/Mueller disagreement

[evince]

here is what I think is going down


buzzfeed said it was people tied to Mueller who tipped them


That pissed Mueller off


he saw some flaw ( we don't know how big the flaw was) in the piece and used that to discredit the idea to protect the FBI from the leaking claim


he made this comment not just for this reason


He also needed to discredit some of the hard evidence the piece referenced


NOT MENTIONING the EXACT bit


they wanted to stop speculation of what they have because they are not done


they don't want the people they are still interviewing to speculate about what Mueller has on them BEFORE hes done with them


Mueller NEVER remarks on shit huh


he did this time for multiple reasons


it screwed with what hes not finished with yet



that is why he kept it so broad


inaccurate.

NOT

dead wrong


get it folks

[volsrock]

here is what I think is going down


buzzfeed said it was people tied to Mueller who tipped them


That pissed Mueller off


he saw some flaw ( we don't know how big the flaw was) in the piece and used that to discredit the idea to protect the FBI from the leaking claim


he made this comment not just for this reason


He also needed to discredit some of the hard evidence the piece referenced


NOT MENTIONING the EXACT bit


they wanted to stop speculation of what they have because they are not done


they don't want the people they are still interviewing to speculate about what Mueller has on them BEFORE hes done with them


Mueller NEVER remarks on shit huh


he did this time for multiple reasons


it screwed with what hes not finished with yet



that is why he kept it so broad


inaccurate.

NOT

dead wrong


get it folks

Translation..fake news..Tranny Cock Sucker

[evince]

what were the details of the buzzfeed article that were unaccurate?


You don't know huh.


its cant be the whole thing



Mueller in filings for courts has presented evidence that Cohen said trump told him to lie.


is there evidence to back that claim of Cohen's?


it was obviously some evidence to back Cohens claim


more than just cohens claims

otherwise it would not likely be a claim Mueller would file to the court



Mueller was saying

ITS NOT MY PEOPLE WHO LEAKED


he is also saying if you look at the the things the article claims its inaccurate


one tiny bit can make the entire findings of the journalist wrong in TOTAL


Your cake baking is inaccurate


You did everything correct to bake the cake

You merely placed it in a pan that was too small


that makes your cake baking inaccurate baking

[canceled.2021.1]

Leftist asswipes are really sad and unhinged today

They really thought “this was it”

[evince]

this is another reason Mueller said something about this inaccuracy of something in the Buzzfed article.


he is proving his cred to the facts.


and of course trump the idiot took the bait


He is praising the very people he trashes all the time



and hes using it to pretend this proves him innocent

Its calms Trump down


he feels less trapped while Mueller finishes up

[domer76]

I see it a little differently

Obviously, Mueller brought Cohen back, charged him with lying to Congress and didn't add one minute of time on his sentence for a reason. Even Congress didn't care.

Mueller was setting the stage for a similar charge or one of subornation. Who was suborning Cohen's perjury is the question. Buzzfeed says Trump.

I think the "inaccuracy" lies here. The article said emails, texts, and a cache of other documents. We know that Trump doesn't email or text. So, while Trump may be guilty of subornation, the actual statement may be inaccurate, but not false.

I think the statement was issued because Mueller does not want an outside source to get ahead of him and the pace of his investigation. That makes things more difficult for him. I also doubt the sources were part of his team, but perhaps investigators peripherally involved in gathering information.

We'll see the final report in due time. It won't be pretty for Trump and he knows it. Did Trump suborn perjury? We'll see. But, unless Cohen lied to Congress on his own volition, SOMEBODY suborned perjury. I doubt Cohen lied on his own.

The question is, then, who instructed him to lie? Junior? Jared? One of Trump's staff? The scenario that makes the best sense is that Trump ordered someone to then order Cohen to lie. The subornation then goes back to that cocksucker, but more difficult to trace.

[evince]

great stuff domer76



this is clearly not an out right denial of the VAST majority of the article

[reagansghost]

here is what I think is going down


buzzfeed said it was people tied to Mueller who tipped them


That pissed Mueller off


he saw some flaw ( we don't know how big the flaw was) in the piece and used that to discredit the idea to protect the FBI from the leaking claim


he made this comment not just for this reason


He also needed to discredit some of the hard evidence the piece referenced


NOT MENTIONING the EXACT bit


they wanted to stop speculation of what they have because they are not done


they don't want the people they are still interviewing to speculate about what Mueller has on them BEFORE hes done with them


Mueller NEVER remarks on shit huh


he did this time for multiple reasons


it screwed with what hes not finished with yet



that is why he kept it so broad


inaccurate.

NOT

dead wrong


get it folks

could all be true........Mueller is playing 3D chess while Trump plays with ABC blocks and shiny mobiles

[domer76]

great stuff domer76



this is clearly not an out right denial of the VAST majority of the article

The vast majority is solid.

There is a difference between 'false' and 'inaccurate', especially in governmentese "non-denial denials"

In this case, if Trump told a subordinate to tell Cohen to lie and Buzzfeed said Trump suborned perjury, that would be inaccurate, but not false.

[evince]

yeap

its not the same as saying its all wrong

especially when some of the Buzzfeed facts appear in a Mueller court filing

[tinfoil]

The vast majority is solid.

There is a difference between 'false' and 'inaccurate', especially in governmentese "non-denial denials"

In this case, if Trump told a subordinate to tell Cohen to lie and Buzzfeed said Trump suborned perjury, that would be inaccurate, but not false.

LOL
What kind of work do you do? Must not be anything that requires precision. Inaccurate is a word for "not accurate". Can you cite a definition that doesn't contradict your "not false" assertion?

[evince]

could all be true........Mueller is playing 3D chess while Trump plays with ABC blocks and shiny mobiles

I don't think he would tell an untruth


I think its very carefully worded


to accomidate some small detail that was inaccurate


giving him a change to calm the nation down from starting Impeachment


for some reason he thinks the congress needs the rest of his story first

[canceled.2021.1]

Let’s see Donald Trump Jr told the truth yet leftists believe Trump told Cohen to lie

Yup that sounds about right

Or maybe Cohen lied on his own?

We have a guy who has cheated on his taxes and defrauded his boss. Yeah he is a trustworthy guy.

I almost feel bad for JPP leftists who so badly wanted this to be true

Even though it has been thoroughly debunked they are desperately clinging to it

Bless their hearts

[evince]

the impeachment clause


“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”.

[TOP]

Is this it?