Buzzkill?

[reagansghost]

the FAKE SOURCES said that MUELLER had SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Trump suborned perjury

so you don't know? got it

I love this bit by the way......

Putin responded, "What.....after taking precious time out to establish a relationship....we should have a meeting simply to insult one another, we can't act in a civilized manner.... We come to together just to shout and insult?"


fuckin Vlad is slick......great way to say he was giving Don his performance review lol

[Centerleftfl]

I think not. Mueller did not say everything in the report was false.
The special counsel says something or some things are inaccurate.

Is it the ultimate fact or some subsidiary evidence pointing to that? Unknown.

Very CAREFULLY parsed. Ex-FEDERAL prosecutors went on to say given the CHARGES, the 'addl charge' when COHEN had to go back to court for to lying congress but MUELLER recommended NO additional time to his sentence, thinks this statement to might be to protect another case (or something they aren't finished with?). All above my head but even the Mueller statement triggered thoughts in their brains, there is no real denial. Inaccurate doesn't mean FALSE.

"Buzzkill" was pretty damn specific in it's remarks BACK TO MUELLER. Tell us what was "inaccurate". And they stood by their story.

[domer76]

a FEW DETAILS??? LIKE SUBSTANTIVE DOCUMENTS ?????

The words “specific statements” were used. NOT “substantive documents”.

We know the core of Buzzfeed’s story is true and accurate. Cohen lied to Congress about the Moscow Trump Tower. Mueller made sure to bring him back, specifically charge him with that and he pleaded guilty. Mueller’s office indicated the truth of all off that. And they never asked for a minute of extra time for that plea. Why do you think that is?

Because they set the stage to determine whether someone is responsible for suborning that perjury.

That was a very narrowly worded release by SCO. We’ll see what it really means when Mueller’s report comes out and/or when Cohen testifies. Can’t wait, can you? I’m sure Trump and his family will be totally vindicated.

[dukkha]

so you don't know? got it

I love this bit by the way......

Putin responded, "What.....after taking precious time out to establish a relationship....we should have a meeting simply to insult one another, we can't act in a civilized manner.... We come to together just to shout and insult?"


fuckin Vlad is slick......great way to say he was giving Don his performance review lol

last thing I'm going to do is debate Russian relations with a Russiaphobe/idiotic "colluder"

I don't know what dude? I KNOW WHAT MUELLER PUT OUT. there are no supporting doc as BF said.

get some clues

[reagansghost]

last thing I'm going to do is debate Russian relations with a Russiaphobe/idiotic "colluder"

I don't know what dude? I KNOW WHAT MUELLER PUT OUT. there are no supporting doc as BF said.

get some clues

so what was Mueller concerned about?

do you know that much?

[dukkha]

The words “specific statements” were used. NOT “substantive documents”.

We know the core of Buzzfeed’s story is true and accurate. Cohen lied to Congress about the Moscow Trump Tower. Mueller made sure to bring him back, specifically charge him with that and he pleaded guilty. Mueller’s office indicated the truth of all off that. And they never asked for a minute of extra time for that plea. Why do you think that is?

Because they set the stage to determine whether someone is responsible for suborning that perjury.

That was a very narrowly worded release by SCO. We’ll see what it really means when Mueller’s report comes out and/or when Cohen testifies. Can’t wait, can you? I’m sure Trump and his family will be totally vindicated.

“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,” said the spokesman, Peter Carr.

somebody else did it!

[reagansghost]

“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,” said the spokesman, Peter Carr.

so what exactly is inaccurate?

what, ya don't know? lol

[domer76]

Very CAREFULLY parsed. Ex-FEDERAL prosecutors went on to say given the CHARGES, the 'addl charge' when COHEN had to go back to court for to lying congress but MUELLER recommended NO additional time to his sentence, thinks this statement to might be to 'protect' another case. All above my head but even the Mueller statement triggered, NOPE, there is no denial of fact.

Inaccurate doesn't mean WRONG.

"Buzzkill" was pretty damn specific in it's remarks BACK TO MUELLER. Tell us what was "inaccurate". And they stood by their story.

Bingo. You nailed it. That release by Carr was very carefully and narrowly worded. It referred ONLY to info regarding the SCO’s office, NOT necessarily the two sources referenced in Buzzfeed’s story. The core of Buzzfeed’s story is true and accurate.

[dukkha]

so what exactly is inaccurate?

what, ya don't know? lol

do some research..the "reporters" said Mueller had confirming evidence or doc or some such crap.
IOW's it wasn't just Cohen's word. it was backed up

[dukkha]

OMG.. time for me to go. Fantasyland is now in progress

[domer76]

so what exactly is inaccurate?

what, ya don't know? lol

Notice the release mentions ONLY “specific statements to the special counsel’s office”. The sources for Buzzfeed were not in the SCO.

[reagansghost]

do some research..the "reporters" said Mueller had confirming evidence or doc or some such crap.
IOW's it wasn't just Cohen's word. it was backed up

do some research?

why, you already know but won't tell me, right?

[domer76]

do some research..the "reporters" said Mueller had confirming evidence or doc or some such crap.
IOW's it wasn't just Cohen's word. it was backed up

Mueller’s office has already confirmed that Cohen’s word was backed up by corroborating evidence. There is no dispute there.

[reagansghost]

Notice the release mentions ONLY “specific statements to the special counsel’s office”. The sources for Buzzfeed were not in the SCO.

exactly, and it's fun watching the desperados clutching at straws lol

[tinfoil]

Mueller’s office has already confirmed that Cohen’s word was backed up by corroborating evidence. There is no dispute there.

Your boyfriend confirmed that your anus was backed up with fecal matter. There is no dispute there.