More daily political violence and death threats from the left

[evince]

Your own words here should tell you you're repeating ignorant lies. They WOULDN'T have to clean them up if they weren't weapons grade. Hint: You're a brainwashed tool parroting misinformation, actual idiot.

WEAPONS GRADE means it can be put into a weapon

It was a chemical waste spot on the ground they had to clean up asshole


It had been bombed by Clinton and made unweaponanizable

It did nit make the chemicals vanish idiot

Repeating your demagogue lies won't make them true. Sorry, it just doesn't work that way.

so you claim Clinton never bombed them?

REALLY?

Right, because if we had not gone in, those weapons would be getting USED, actual idiot.

NOPE Clinton bombed the sites that were making them and scattered them in the area contaminating the ground n the area.



The UN inspectors found no weapons grade chems asshole

The Bush kicked them out so he could lie about it



you don't get to rewrite history you fucking rat bag Putin bot hole

[evince]

The claim wasn't that brand new WMD were in the hands of a genocidal terror-sponsor in a post-9/11 world after a decade of failed diplomacy. This talking point is a diversionary fallacy.

LINK


you are about to be destroyed again by the TRUE FACTS

[evince]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_a...ss_destruction


Iraq actively researched and later employed weapons of mass destruction from 1962 to 1991, when it destroyed its chemical weapons stockpile and halted its biological and nuclear weapon programs.[1] The fifth president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was internationally condemned for his use of chemical weapons during the 1980s campaign against Iranian and Kurdish civilians during and after the Iran–Iraq War. In the 1980s, Saddam pursued an extensive biological weapons program and a nuclear weapons program, though no nuclear bomb was built. After the Persian Gulf War (1990-1991), the United Nations (with the Iraqi government) located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi chemical weapons and related equipment and materials, and Iraq ceased both its chemical, biological and nuclear programs.[2]
In the early 2000s, the administrations of George W. Bush and Tony Blair asserted that Saddam Hussein's weapons programs were still actively building weapons, and that large stockpiles of WMDs were hidden in Iraq. Inspections by the UN to resolve the status of unresolved disarmament questions restarted between November 2002 and March 2003,[3] under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441, which demanded Saddam give "immediate, unconditional and active cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspections, shortly before his country was attacked.[4] The United States asserted that Saddam's frequent lack of cooperation was a breach of Resolution 1441, but failed to convince the UN Security Council to pass a new resolution authorizing the use of force due to lack of evidence.[5][6][7] Despite this, Bush asserted peaceful measures could not disarm Iraq of the weapons he alleged it to have and launched a second Gulf War instead. Later U.S.-led inspections found that Iraq had earlier ceased active WMD production and stockpiling.[1]
Iraq signed the Geneva Protocol in 1931, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1969, and the Biological Weapons Convention in 1972, but did not ratify it until June 11, 1991. Iraq has not signed to the Chemical Weapons Convention.

[evince]

The claim wasn't that brand new WMD were in the hands of a genocidal terror-sponsor in a post-9/11 world after a decade of failed diplomacy. This talking point is a diversionary fallacy.

In the early 2000s, the administrations of George W. Bush and Tony Blair asserted that Saddam Hussein's weapons programs were still actively building weapons, and that large stockpiles of WMDs were hidden in Iraq.

[evince]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Iraq_(1998)


Bombing of Iraq (1998)
Persian Gulf Wars
The December 1998 bombing of Iraq (code-named Operation Desert Fox) was a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets from 16 December 1998, to 19 December 1998, by the United States and the United Kingdom. The contemporaneous justification for the strikes was Iraq's failure to comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions and its interference with United Nations Special Commission inspectors.
The operation was a major flare-up in the Iraq disarmament crisis. The stated goal of the cruise missile and bombing attacks was to strike military and security targets in Iraq that contributed to Iraq's ability to produce, store, maintain, and deliver weapons of mass destruction. The bombing campaign had been anticipated since February 1998 and incurred wide-ranging criticism and support, at home and abroad.[3] Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates initially announced they would deny the U.S. military the use of local bases for the purpose of air strikes against Iraq.[4]

[artichoke]

NOPE Clinton bombed the sites that were making them and scattered them in the area contaminating the ground n the area.



The UN inspectors found no weapons grade chems asshole

The Bush kicked them out so he could lie about it



you don't get to rewrite history you fucking rat bag Putin bot hole

You're going off the rails at this point. You can't even keep track of what is being claimed. Like when I called it a demagogue lie to claim that Bush "lied us into Iraq" and you responded by saying, "so you claim Clinton never bombed them?" Obviously, you need to get your paper breathing back, take some Midol, and come back after your little snowflake time-out in your safe space. Then we'll finish trying to detangle all the easily-debunked lies you've swallowed hole.

[evince]

The claim wasn't that brand new WMD were in the hands of a genocidal terror-sponsor in a post-9/11 world after a decade of failed diplomacy. This talking point is a diversionary fallacy.

a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets from 16 December 1998, to 19 December 1998, by the United States and the United Kingdom.



bombing the fuck out of Sadams Iraq is not diplomacy you lying weasel shit brick

[evince]

You're going off the rails at this point. You can't even keep track of what is being claimed. Like when I called it a demagogue lie to claim that Bush "lied us into Iraq" and you responded by saying, "so you claim Clinton never bombed them?" Obviously, you need to get your paper breathing back, take some Midol, and come back after your little snowflake time-out in your safe space. Then we'll finish trying to detangle all the easily-debunked lies you've swallowed hole.

you just got fucked hard by the facts putins cock holster

[artichoke]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Iraq_(1998)


Bombing of Iraq (1998)
Persian Gulf Wars
The December 1998 bombing of Iraq (code-named Operation Desert Fox) was a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets from 16 December 1998, to 19 December 1998, by the United States and the United Kingdom. The contemporaneous justification for the strikes was Iraq's failure to comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions and its interference with United Nations Special Commission inspectors.
The operation was a major flare-up in the Iraq disarmament crisis. The stated goal of the cruise missile and bombing attacks was to strike military and security targets in Iraq that contributed to Iraq's ability to produce, store, maintain, and deliver weapons of mass destruction. The bombing campaign had been anticipated since February 1998 and incurred wide-ranging criticism and support, at home and abroad.[3] Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates initially announced they would deny the U.S. military the use of local bases for the purpose of air strikes against Iraq.[4]

The same lying demagogue who just spent ten pages hyperventilating over sources because I used the "right-wing" New York Times to point out what a tyrannical fascist scumbag Kamala Harris is...is using Wikipedia to prop up her debunked propaganda.

[evince]

The claim wasn't that brand new WMD were in the hands of a genocidal terror-sponsor in a post-9/11 world after a decade of failed diplomacy. This talking point is a diversionary fallacy.

that was the claim they made asshole


You lying about it doesnt change the facts

[artichoke]

Top ten liberal lies about Iraq

Now that the news media are finally being forced to admit that Iraq was a success (at least, until Democrat rushed in and snatched defeat from the jaws of victory), here are the top ten falsehoods liberals have used to destroy public support for this war:

10. Iran and North Korea were the more urgent threats.

The lunatic regimes Democrats installed in Iran and appeased in North Korea had already acquired dangerous weapons and had not yet defied twelve years of U.N. Resolutions (which liberals insist wasn't enough time for Saddam). What happened to trying diplomacy first?

Stopping Saddam from building more dangerous weapons was clearly far more urgent.

9. The Iraqis never wanted us there.

Contrary to everything liberals tell us, the Iraqis really did greet us as liberators. And long after we went into Iraq, the Iraqi people continued to support us and the invasion. It was only after Iran and Syria began sending foreign fighters across the borders to conduct vicious sectarian terrorism campaigns that public opinion started to change...at which point liberals immediately rushed in and began incessantly misrepresenting this manufactured violence as Iraqis rebelling against some un-welcome "occupation," and deeming the entire war a hopeless and unwinnable "quagmire."

Liberals also naturally rushed in to protect Iran and Syria as they openly instigated, armed and funded the attacks on our troops...while demanding more groveling, appeasement and surrender from the U.S., even though such terrorist regimes have openly admitted that meeting with them merely legitimizes their cause.

8. Bush had no plan ('Mission Accomplished').

Between telling us the war was lost, that the surge would never work and that Iraq was a "distraction" (apparently we should wait for eachindividual terror-sponsor to hit us separately before acting against any of them), Democrats constantly accused Bush of not having a plan. This was before they took office and adopted his plan entirely. That plan was simply to rebuild the country and leave when the Iraqis could take over.

This was made clear in the "Mission Accomplished" speech, along with the fact that the rebuilding process would be long and difficult. Liberals naturally responded by pretending the "Mission Accomplished" sign meant President Bush was prematurely claiming that the entire war was over, rather than just the initial invasion, thus inventing a bogus gaffe out of thin air.

7. The war has killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

Not even close. Liberals have repeatedly been caught wildly exaggerating Iraqi casualties, fabricating horror stories and falsely trashing our troops. Additionally, they have insisted since the beginning on talking only about the one tiny triangle of the country with all of the problems. This would be like judging California (which is the same size as Iraq) solely by the ghettos of L.A..

It completely ignores things like the lives saved by us killing terrorists (as well as how much better off the Shiites, Kurds, women and Israelis are).

6. We rushed in unilaterally.

After years of failed diplomacy, we went in with a coalition of forty different countries. France, Germany and Russia were too busy protecting their corrupt, behind-the-scenes dealings with Saddam (in blatant defiance of UN Resolutions) to lift a finger.

5. The war was illegal.

As Front Page Magazine has explained, the (endless) U.N. Resolutions authorized the war:

Saddam was an international outlaw. He had violated the 1991 Gulf War truce and all the arms control agreements it embodied, including UN resolutions 687 and 689, and the 15 subsequent UN resolutions designed to enforce them. The last of these, UN Security Council Resolution 1441, was itself a war ultimatum to Saddam giving him “one final opportunity” to disarm – or else. The ultimatum expired on December 7, 2002, and America went to war three months later.

4. We didn't give diplomacy a chance.

Here is the 12-year time-line of exhaustive diplomatic efforts that preceded the war.

3. All we did was turn the Islamic world against us.

Newsflash: They already hated us. Iraq was invaded after 9/11, after eight years of unanswered al Qaida attacks and after decades of unprovoked attacks before that. It didn't start with us finally deciding to fight back. In fact, it was only once we started drawing the enemy away from U.S. soil and onto a Middle Eastern battlefield (part of Bush's stated objective) that we went seven years without a single domestic terrorist attack.

Fighting back does create more terrorists, but so does not fighting back, as Democrats demonstrated when they retreated from Islamic terrorists in Somalia. Bin Laden responded by calling the American soldier a "paper tiger" without the "stomach for war" and by using it to recruit more terrorists. We need to stop worrying about creating more terrorists and just focus on stopping them.

These are the people who poured into the streets by the thousands all around the world to dance and celebrate on 9/11 (a fact liberals unsuccessfully tried to dismiss). They attack us for the same reason that they attack everyone else--Islam is a savage cult that stones women to death for being raped, starts deadly global riots over cartoons and is obsessed with slaughtering infidels.

2. Saddam had no ties with terrorists.

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Hussein made pacts with al Qaida (pg. 61), offered bin Laden safe haven (pg. 66) and offered to help al Qaida with chemical and biological weapons (pg. 128). He also sheltered al Qaida terrorists, openly sponsored suicide bombers and provided safe haven to notorious terrorist fugitive Abu Abbas.

Additionally, the news media copiously documented the connections until the moment Republicans wanted to remove Saddam.

1. There were no WMD.

Even after giving Saddam 9 months to hide his WMD in Syria while we publicly debated invading, we still found thousands of artillery shells filled with mustard and sarin gas (many with still-lethal purity levels as high as 84%). We also found nearly two tons of low-enriched Uranium, vials of live botulism, a seven-pound block of cyanide salt, and more.

Saddam Hussein had WMD, and repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to use them on civilian populations. And according to the FBI agent who questioned him, Saddam openly admitted that he was aggressively seeking to finish reconstituting his WMD program. This is consistent with other inconvenient truths, like the fact that he sent a delegation to Niger in 1999 to "expand commercial relations"...with a country that only exports Uranium (another fact liberals have humiliated and discredited themselves trying to lie about).

Tapes recovered after the fall of Baghdad even reveal Hussein discussing how to launch a terrorist attack on U.S. soil with WMD.

The bottom line: Liberals saw the same evidence as President Bush and drew the same conclusions as he did. After 9/11, genocidal terror-sponsors obsessed with WMD, who had already been through more than a decade of failed UN diplomacy, simply could no longer be tolerated. Contrary to everything we have been told, the invasion of Iraq was absolutely urgent and necessary...and Democrats emphatically agreed at the time.

[evince]

The same lying demagogue who just spent ten pages hyperventilating over sources because I used the "right-wing" New York Times to point out what a tyrannical fascist scumbag Kamala Harris is...is using Wikipedia to prop up her debunked propaganda.

its was NOT the NY Times

It was on the opinion page idiot

do you not know what the opinion page of every fucking paper is?



again your lies have been crushed with verifiable facts


and you bot on

No Human would continue your little game out of PURE embarrassment


thanks for proving your bot hood for us

[evince]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Iraq_(1998)


Bombing of Iraq (1998)
Persian Gulf Wars
The December 1998 bombing of Iraq (code-named Operation Desert Fox) was a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets from 16 December 1998, to 19 December 1998, by the United States and the United Kingdom. The contemporaneous justification for the strikes was Iraq's failure to comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions and its interference with United Nations Special Commission inspectors.
The operation was a major flare-up in the Iraq disarmament crisis. The stated goal of the cruise missile and bombing attacks was to strike military and security targets in Iraq that contributed to Iraq's ability to produce, store, maintain, and deliver weapons of mass destruction. The bombing campaign had been anticipated since February 1998 and incurred wide-ranging criticism and support, at home and abroad.[3] Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates initially announced they would deny the U.S. military the use of local bases for the purpose of air strikes against Iraq.[4]

verifiable facts with links as apposed to your mouth pooping

[evince]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_a...ss_destruction


Iraq actively researched and later employed weapons of mass destruction from 1962 to 1991, when it destroyed its chemical weapons stockpile and halted its biological and nuclear weapon programs.[1] The fifth president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was internationally condemned for his use of chemical weapons during the 1980s campaign against Iranian and Kurdish civilians during and after the Iran–Iraq War. In the 1980s, Saddam pursued an extensive biological weapons program and a nuclear weapons program, though no nuclear bomb was built. After the Persian Gulf War (1990-1991), the United Nations (with the Iraqi government) located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi chemical weapons and related equipment and materials, and Iraq ceased both its chemical, biological and nuclear programs.[2]
In the early 2000s, the administrations of George W. Bush and Tony Blair asserted that Saddam Hussein's weapons programs were still actively building weapons, and that large stockpiles of WMDs were hidden in Iraq. Inspections by the UN to resolve the status of unresolved disarmament questions restarted between November 2002 and March 2003,[3] under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441, which demanded Saddam give "immediate, unconditional and active cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspections, shortly before his country was attacked.[4] The United States asserted that Saddam's frequent lack of cooperation was a breach of Resolution 1441, but failed to convince the UN Security Council to pass a new resolution authorizing the use of force due to lack of evidence.[5][6][7] Despite this, Bush asserted peaceful measures could not disarm Iraq of the weapons he alleged it to have and launched a second Gulf War instead. Later U.S.-led inspections found that Iraq had earlier ceased active WMD production and stockpiling.[1]
Iraq signed the Geneva Protocol in 1931, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1969, and the Biological Weapons Convention in 1972, but did not ratify it until June 11, 1991. Iraq has not signed to the Chemical Weapons Convention.

verifiable facts with links as apposed to your mouth pooping

[LV426]

Say the people burning everything down, assaulting people, issuing death threats, etc. And Nazi stands for "National Socialist," genius. Hitler was left-wing on almost everything.

"OMG! SOMEONE SAID SOMETHING MEAN TO ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA!!!"