Law professor exposes Kamala Harris' prosecutorial career as lawless partisan hackery

[evince]

OPINION NOT FACT

[evince]

SOURCES MATTER


and I will always attack shitty sources

so your fucked

[domer76]

This is domer76-level pettiness. The link is right there in the article. First paragraph. Click on it or don't.

It is so fulfilling, knowing that I kicked your ass so hard on the other thread that I’m now living rent free in that empty little gourd of yours.

You try to offer a far RW source, and an opinion piece (again), as fact, in order to disparage this person. Great. Yet, you’ll hang on to the biggest piece of lying human feces ever to sit in the Oval Office. Address that one, bitch.

I’ll give you this, though, dumbfuck. At least your OPINION piece isn’t from 2013 this time.

[Sailor]

^The midget rages on LOL!

[volsrock]

SOURCES MATTER


and I will always attack shitty sources

so your fucked

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/polit...ice/index.html

Chalk CNN as shitty in your book

[evince]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/polit...ice/index.html

Chalk CNN as shitty in your book

(CNN)As Kamala Harris positions for a likely presidential run that could be announced as early as this week, the California senator fielded an early hit on her criminal justice record Thursday in the form of a scathing opinion piece in The New York Times.


An article abut the OPINION of one lawyer/writer trying to sell a book

[evince]

you fucks prove over and over again you don't understand sources

[Superfreak]

OPINION NOT FACT

Those cases are not opinion you dumb shit. Those cases actually happened. You can form an opinion about whether you think she acted correctly or not, but the cases happened you fucking idiot.

[Superfreak]

you fucks prove over and over again you don't understand sources

pure fucking irony

[evince]

pure fucking irony

The source is one persons opinion


there is no way around that fact idiot

[evince]

Those cases are not opinion you dumb shit. Those cases actually happened. You can form an opinion about whether you think she acted correctly or not, but the cases happened you fucking idiot.

The assessment of them is based on ONE PERSONS OPINION


see how that works you fucking shit bag


ONE PERSONS OPINION

that person is trying to sell a book right now

A person with no name recognition so she used someone who did have name recognition

[anonymoose]

I would love a candidate this flawed to get the nomination.

She's my pick as the worst possible. I'd call her the front runner for the dims.

[Nordberg]

Winning cases by technicality? WTF, what lawyer has not done that?
I have heard her questioning people in Congress and she does a very good job, very impressive.

[evince]

you hate every non ReTrumpAgain so your opinion is useless too moose

[evince]

Winning cases by technicality? WTF, what lawyer has not done that?
I have heard her questioning people in Congress and she does a very good job, very impressive.

the shitty ones