Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678910 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 137

Thread: Law professor exposes Kamala Harris' prosecutorial career as lawless partisan hackery

  1. #106 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Frank Apisa-level stupidity on full display here. You describing trademark Democrat demagoguery to the letter and then calling it a Republican behavior without a shred of evidence is obviously what's being referred to here.
    Dude! Give it up already! No one gives one squirt of runny shit about what you have to say anymore!

    No one listens to idiots like you- but other idiots!

    How about it idiots- anyone of you other idiots here like to put a plug in for Arminius? Let's hear it!

    That's what I thought! LOL!

  2. #107 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    time after time, when progressives urged her to embrace criminal justice reforms as a district attorney and then the state’s attorney general, Ms. Harris opposed them or stayed silent. Most troubling, Ms. Harris fought tooth and nail to uphold wrongful convictions that had been secured through official misconduct that included evidence tampering, false testimony and the suppression of crucial information by prosecutors.

    For example, Bazelon writes about a 2010 incident in which Harris was criticized for failing to act when she discovered a police lab technician was “intentionally sabotaging” her work.
    A judge “condemned Ms. Harris’s indifference to the systemic violation of the defendants’ constitutional rights,” and 600 cases in which the technician was involved had to be dismissed.
    another rogue prosecutor

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    artichoke (01-18-2019)

  4. #108 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    I feel like this post unintentionally verifies my point. This professor identified her as an unethical scumbag, even if he wanted her to become an even more unethical scumbag. Thanks for verifying.

    good summation

  5. #109 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,777 Times in 27,251 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Again, The liberal who scrutinized her career think she's a total scumbag. That liberal having written an opinion piece listing the FACTS on which that opinion is based in no way invalidates the examples that liberal provided. Refute the facts provided or give up this phony posturing.
    One person with NO NAME recognition who is trying to sell a book had an opinion of the cases involving a person with HUGE name recognition


    just how fucking stupid are you

  6. #110 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Another garbage human being who should not be allowed anywhere near the judiciary committee now wants her unhinged lunatic extremism elevated to the most powerful office on Earth.

    Law Professor Offers Blistering Critique of Kamala Harris’s Career as a Prosecutor

    "Wrongful convictions, poor judgment, and winning cases by technicality: a University of San Francisco law professor provides a horrifying view of Harris's law career."
    In other words, the perfect Democrat candidate.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    artichoke (01-18-2019)

  8. #111 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,777 Times in 27,251 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    good summation
    its not a he idiot


    the asshole cant even get one line correct about the OPINION PAGE opinion of a person trying to sell a book

  9. #112 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    worst of all, though, is Ms. Harris’s record in wrongful conviction cases. Consider George Gage, an electrician with no criminal record who was charged in 1999 with sexually abusing his stepdaughter, who reported the allegations years later. The case largely hinged on the stepdaughter’s testimony and Mr. Gage was convicted.

    Afterward, the judge discovered that the prosecutor had unlawfully held back potentially exculpatory evidence, including medical reports indicating that the stepdaughter had been repeatedly untruthful with law enforcement. Her mother even described her as “a pathological liar” who “lives her lies.

    In 2015, when the case reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, Ms. Harris’s prosecutors defended the conviction
    what a sleeze ball she is. anything for a conviction!

  10. #113 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Mr. Gage is still in prison serving a 70-year sentence.

    That case is not an outlier. Ms. Harris also fought to keep Daniel Larsen in prison on a 28-year-to-life sentence for possession of a concealed weapon even though his trial lawyer was incompetent and there was compelling evidence of his innocence. Relying on a technicality again, Ms. Harris argued that Mr. Larsen failed to raise his legal arguments in a timely fashion. (This time, she lost.)

    She also defended Johnny Baca’s conviction for murder even though judges found a prosecutor presented false testimony at the trial. She relented only after a video of the oral argument received national attention and embarrassed her office.
    OMG! she is a fascist

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    artichoke (01-18-2019)

  12. #114 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    She's my pick as the worst possible. I'd call her the front runner for the dims.
    she's inexperienced. Made a fool of herself at the Kavanaugh hearings where an ATTY LIKE HERSELF
    was ready to deny due process, and is a far left fascist wacko...gawd save us all from her reach

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    artichoke (01-18-2019)

  14. #115 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf_Twitler View Post
    Dude! Give it up already! No one gives one squirt of runny shit about what you have to say anymore!

    No one listens to idiots like you- but other idiots!

    How about it idiots- anyone of you other idiots here like to put a plug in for Arminius? Let's hear it!

    That's what I thought! LOL!
    More harmless, infantile posturing.


  15. #116 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    another rogue prosecutor
    Exactly. Notice how the conservative looks up the details while the other (literally one hundred) posts by liberals were all filled with mindless psychotic vitriol seeking out not one iota of clarity. THAT'S what people mean when they say liberals are by nature demagogues. The only people involved who are NEVER concerned with the truth.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    dukkha (01-18-2019)

  17. #117 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    One person with NO NAME recognition who is trying to sell a book had an opinion of the cases involving a person with HUGE name recognition


    just how fucking stupid are you
    Repeating your ad hominem fallacy with additional ad hominem fallacies won't make it less invalid. Your desperation is becoming comical.

  18. #118 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    its not a he idiot
    Says the person who can't form a coherent sentence in English.

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    the asshole cant even get one line correct about the OPINION PAGE opinion of a person trying to sell a book
    Again, repeating this fallacy won't make it less bogus. Try again.


  19. #119 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    she's inexperienced. Made a fool of herself at the Kavanaugh hearings where an ATTY LIKE HERSELF
    was ready to deny due process, and is a far left fascist wacko...gawd save us all from her reach
    ^^^^^This.

  20. #120 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    Camala might as well find another quest, she will not ever be the president, would like to see here muddle the already dirty waters of the DNC though with a run
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

Similar Threads

  1. Fox has already apologized to Kamala Harris, more apologies to come
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2019, 12:14 PM
  2. Is Kamala Harris Eligible to be President?
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-20-2018, 10:47 PM
  3. Kamala Harris and the Bernie wing
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-01-2017, 09:52 AM
  4. Kamala Harris and Women's Rights
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-22-2017, 03:04 PM
  5. Partisan Hackery (Or, How I Learned Politics Could be Fun)
    By gonzojournals in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 04:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •