Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 137

Thread: Law professor exposes Kamala Harris' prosecutorial career as lawless partisan hackery

  1. #76 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    OPINION NOT FACT

  2. #77 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  3. #78 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    This is domer76-level pettiness. The link is right there in the article. First paragraph. Click on it or don't.
    It is so fulfilling, knowing that I kicked your ass so hard on the other thread that I’m now living rent free in that empty little gourd of yours.

    You try to offer a far RW source, and an opinion piece (again), as fact, in order to disparage this person. Great. Yet, you’ll hang on to the biggest piece of lying human feces ever to sit in the Oval Office. Address that one, bitch.

    I’ll give you this, though, dumbfuck. At least your OPINION piece isn’t from 2013 this time.
    Last edited by domer76; 01-18-2019 at 02:49 PM.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to domer76 For This Post:

    evince (01-18-2019)

  5. #79 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    ^The midget rages on LOL!

  6. #80 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,915
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,540 Times in 9,991 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    SOURCES MATTER


    and I will always attack shitty sources

    so your fucked
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/polit...ice/index.html

    Chalk CNN as shitty in your book

  7. #81 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    (CNN)As Kamala Harris positions for a likely presidential run that could be announced as early as this week, the California senator fielded an early hit on her criminal justice record Thursday in the form of a scathing opinion piece in The New York Times.


    An article abut the OPINION of one lawyer/writer trying to sell a book

  8. #82 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  9. #83 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    OPINION NOT FACT
    Those cases are not opinion you dumb shit. Those cases actually happened. You can form an opinion about whether you think she acted correctly or not, but the cases happened you fucking idiot.

  10. #84 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    you fucks prove over and over again you don't understand sources
    pure fucking irony

  11. #85 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  12. #86 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    Those cases are not opinion you dumb shit. Those cases actually happened. You can form an opinion about whether you think she acted correctly or not, but the cases happened you fucking idiot.
    The assessment of them is based on ONE PERSONS OPINION


    see how that works you fucking shit bag


    ONE PERSONS OPINION

    that person is trying to sell a book right now

    A person with no name recognition so she used someone who did have name recognition

  13. #87 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    I would love a candidate this flawed to get the nomination.
    She's my pick as the worst possible. I'd call her the front runner for the dims.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to anonymoose For This Post:

    dukkha (01-18-2019)

  15. #88 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,510
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,554 Times in 17,084 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Winning cases by technicality? WTF, what lawyer has not done that?
    I have heard her questioning people in Congress and she does a very good job, very impressive.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    evince (01-18-2019)

  17. #89 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  18. #90 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Winning cases by technicality? WTF, what lawyer has not done that?
    I have heard her questioning people in Congress and she does a very good job, very impressive.
    the shitty ones

Similar Threads

  1. Fox has already apologized to Kamala Harris, more apologies to come
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2019, 12:14 PM
  2. Is Kamala Harris Eligible to be President?
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-20-2018, 10:47 PM
  3. Kamala Harris and the Bernie wing
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-01-2017, 09:52 AM
  4. Kamala Harris and Women's Rights
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-22-2017, 03:04 PM
  5. Partisan Hackery (Or, How I Learned Politics Could be Fun)
    By gonzojournals in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 04:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •