Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Two Word State Of The Union Address

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default Two Word State Of The Union Address

    Constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth finally said something worthwhile. Submit the State of the Union Address in writing:




    Don Junior fails to see the gift Nutso offered:

    Donald Trump, Jr. slammed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for trying to get President Donald Trump to delay his State of the Union address as the government shutdown continues, in an exclusive statement to The Daily Caller.

    Don Jr: Pelosi ‘Terrified’ To Let American People Hear Trump ‘Unfiltered’
    10:45 AM 01/16/2019

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/16/e...mp-unfiltered/

    Nutso gave President Trump a once in a lifetime opportunity to send his SOTU over on a sticky note. The more he says the more Democrats can lie about. In short: Democrats will play hell lying about two words:


    No borders.

    Nailing Democrats for no borders in a brief written message is all the more reason to go back to Thomas Jefferson:

    For more than a century, the State of the Union was delivered to Congress in writing rather than in a speech before a joint session of Congress. George Washington delivered the first State of the Union address—or “Annual Message” if you prefer—in person and in New York. (It was the capital of the United States from 1785 to 1790.) John Adams did likewise during his one term in office. Thomas Jefferson, however, abandoned the in-person speech for the written message, perhaps because he wasn’t a great public speaker. The practice of a written message persisted until 1913, when Woodrow Wilson revived the practice of giving a speech. Ever since FDR, presidents have almost always used speeches rather than written messages to fulfill their constitutional obligation to inform Congress about the State of the Union.

    https://www.cfr.org/blog/ten-facts-a...-union-address

    In any event the State of the Union Address delivered in person has become a television extravaganza engineered to make Republican presidents look bad —— while it makes Democrat presidents shine like Moses:



    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. The Following User Groans At Flanders For This Awful Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (01-19-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Orangetweet is in a real bind, because he can neither speak nor write.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to domer76 For This Post:

    Althea (01-24-2019), christiefan915 (01-18-2019), ThatOwlWoman (01-17-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth finally said something worthwhile. Submit the State of the Union Address in writing:




    Don Junior fails to see the gift Nutso offered:

    Donald Trump, Jr. slammed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for trying to get President Donald Trump to delay his State of the Union address as the government shutdown continues, in an exclusive statement to The Daily Caller.

    Don Jr: Pelosi ‘Terrified’ To Let American People Hear Trump ‘Unfiltered’
    10:45 AM 01/16/2019

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/16/e...mp-unfiltered/

    Nutso gave President Trump a once in a lifetime opportunity to send his SOTU over on a sticky note. The more he says the more Democrats can lie about. In short: Democrats will play hell lying about two words:


    No borders.

    Nailing Democrats for no borders in a brief written message is all the more reason to go back to Thomas Jefferson:

    For more than a century, the State of the Union was delivered to Congress in writing rather than in a speech before a joint session of Congress. George Washington delivered the first State of the Union address—or “Annual Message” if you prefer—in person and in New York. (It was the capital of the United States from 1785 to 1790.) John Adams did likewise during his one term in office. Thomas Jefferson, however, abandoned the in-person speech for the written message, perhaps because he wasn’t a great public speaker. The practice of a written message persisted until 1913, when Woodrow Wilson revived the practice of giving a speech. Ever since FDR, presidents have almost always used speeches rather than written messages to fulfill their constitutional obligation to inform Congress about the State of the Union.

    https://www.cfr.org/blog/ten-facts-a...-union-address

    In any event the State of the Union Address delivered in person has become a television extravaganza engineered to make Republican presidents look bad —— while it makes Democrat presidents shine like Moses:



    Or he could on live TV and say two words that would cause liberal heads to explode:

    THE WALL
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Flanders (01-17-2019)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Nailing Democrats for no borders in a brief written message is all the more reason to go back to Thomas Jefferson:
    The key to understanding what the SOTU was meant to address in the first place can be found in its Article II constitutional wording, which states that the president “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.” Accordingly, early presidents concentrated on the nuts-and-bolts of government, including budget requests, the general economy, and other mundane matters.

    Take This SOTU and Shove It
    By Michael Walsh| January 16th, 2019

    https://amgreatness.com/2019/01/16/t...-and-shove-it/

    If President is foolish enough to deliver the SOTU in person he should take the podium, turn and look Nutso right in the eye —— then shove the SOTU where the sun never shines. Then turn and walkout after delivering 23 words:


    The State of the Union is in good shape economically.

    The State of the Union is in bad shape on our Southern border.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Flanders For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (01-17-2019)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default


    Obama Knowingly Allowed MS-13 Gangs In

    Did Obama tell Nutso that MS-13 gang members who are in this country illegally pose a security threat?

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sent a letter Wednesday to the White House asking for a postponement of the annual State of the Union address, citing congressional security concerns because of “hamstrung” security agencies on account of the government shutdown. The letter read, in part:

    The U.S. Secret Service was designated as the lead federal agency responsible for coordinating, planning, exercising, and implementing security for National Special Security Events. However, both the U.S. Secret Service and the Department of Homeland Security [DHS] have not been funded for 26 days now — with critical departments hamstrung by furloughs. Sadly, given the security concerns and unless government re-opens this week, I suggest that we work together to determine another suitable date after government has re-opened for this address or for you to consider delivering your State of the Union address in writing to the Congress on January 29th.


    Secret Service Official: Pelosi Never Contacted Us For Security Plan Before Canceling Trump Speech
    Benny Johnson
    4:29 PM 01/16/2019

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/16/p...ecret-service/
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    State of the Union Address: Fuckedby, White House, Washington, USA

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Did Obama tell Nutso that MS-13 gang members who are in this country illegally pose a security threat?

    It occurred to me that Nutso wanted to get out of town for security reasons —— her own. Thankfully, the commander in chief kept her in town along with all of those AWOL Democrat in order to help fend off a possible attack by illegal aliens:






    Nutso should have been grounded years ago. She treats the House like she is the landlady, but she no authority to treat Air Force planes as her personal property:


    It reads like a dream order for a wild frat party: Maker’s Mark whiskey, Courvoisier cognac, Johnny Walker Red scotch, Grey Goose vodka, E&J brandy, Bailey’s Irish Crème, Bacardi Light rum, Jim Beam whiskey, Beefeater gin, Dewars scotch, Bombay Sapphire gin, Jack Daniels whiskey … and Corona beer.

    But that single receipt makes up just part of the more than $101,000 taxpayers paid for “in-flight services” – including food and liquor, for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trips on Air Force jets over the last two years. That’s almost $1,000 per week.

    Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by Judicial Watch, which investigates and prosecutes government corruption, show Pelosi incurred expenses of some $2.1 million for her use of Air Force jets for travel over that time.

    “Speaker Pelosi has a history of wasting taxpayer funds with her boorish demands for military travel,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said today. “And these documents suggest the Speaker’s congressional delegations are more about partying than anything else.”

    Pelosi, D-Calif., recently joined President Obama on a Judicial Watch list of Top 10 corrupt politicians because of her “sense of entitlement,” the group said.

    “Politicians believe laws and rules (even the U.S. Constitution) apply to the rest of us but not to them. Case in point: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her excessive and boorish demands for military travel. Judicial Watch obtained documents from the Pentagon in 2008 that suggest Pelosi has been treating the Air Force like her own personal airline,” the evaluation said.

    And WND reported almost a year ago that Pelosi was shown to have been erratically canceling and rescheduling flights, as one would with an on-call taxi service.

    “We have … folks prepping the jets and crews driving in (not a short drive for some), cooking meals and preflighting the jets etc,” said one Department of Defense e-mail then.

    Taxpayers' $101,000 includes Pelosi's in-flight 'food, booze'
    Posted By Bob Unruh On 01/29/2010 @ 12:20 am

    https://www.wnd.com/2010/01/123472/

    On the bright side Nutso is not the power she used to be. She is no longer the rising star she was years before she became speaker the first time. Even better than the loss of her star image she has been exposed as a fool too many times to ever again be taken seriously.

    p.s. No swamp creature should use the Air Force for anything. Let politicians get their wealthy donors pick up the travel tab since they get the most from the people they put in office.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    I hope Nutso Nancy knows the difference between the commander in chief wife’s security and members of Congress using Air Force planes to pay for junkets.


    Melania Trump reportedly took a military plane to Florida, hours after Trump canceled Nancy Pelosi's flight because of the shutdown
    Bill Bostock (
    Jan 18th 2019 9:18AM

    https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...ight/23646250/

    Incidentally, congressional junkets wear many disguises, but the real reason global busybodies use Air Force planes is that it does not cost them a penny to meet with foreign leaders in order to promote democracy. The sad part is the millions of tax dollars paying for junkets every year is a mere bagatelle compared to the tens of billions of foreign aid tax dollars paying to build the gallows that will hang this country.

    As a bonus congressional degenerates on so-called fact-finding junkets can engage in their sexual perversions far from prying eyes. (The protection of a foreign government is a lot better than abusing children on a privately owned island.)
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    Here's my State of The Union Address;




    BTW....Does Carl remind you of anyone?
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Mott the Hoople For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (01-18-2019)

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth finally said something worthwhile. Submit the State of the Union Address in writing:




    Don Junior fails to see the gift Nutso offered:

    Donald Trump, Jr. slammed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for trying to get President Donald Trump to delay his State of the Union address as the government shutdown continues, in an exclusive statement to The Daily Caller.

    Don Jr: Pelosi ‘Terrified’ To Let American People Hear Trump ‘Unfiltered’
    10:45 AM 01/16/2019

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/16/e...mp-unfiltered/

    Nutso gave President Trump a once in a lifetime opportunity to send his SOTU over on a sticky note. The more he says the more Democrats can lie about. In short: Democrats will play hell lying about two words:


    No borders.

    Nailing Democrats for no borders in a brief written message is all the more reason to go back to Thomas Jefferson:

    For more than a century, the State of the Union was delivered to Congress in writing rather than in a speech before a joint session of Congress. George Washington delivered the first State of the Union address—or “Annual Message” if you prefer—in person and in New York. (It was the capital of the United States from 1785 to 1790.) John Adams did likewise during his one term in office. Thomas Jefferson, however, abandoned the in-person speech for the written message, perhaps because he wasn’t a great public speaker. The practice of a written message persisted until 1913, when Woodrow Wilson revived the practice of giving a speech. Ever since FDR, presidents have almost always used speeches rather than written messages to fulfill their constitutional obligation to inform Congress about the State of the Union.

    https://www.cfr.org/blog/ten-facts-a...-union-address

    In any event the State of the Union Address delivered in person has become a television extravaganza engineered to make Republican presidents look bad —— while it makes Democrat presidents shine like Moses:



    You might give some thought to being less of a pathologically dishonest whore.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to CharacterAssassin For This Post:

    christiefan915 (01-18-2019)

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    I hope Nutso Nancy knows the difference between the commander in chief wife’s security and members of Congress using Air Force planes to pay for junkets.


    Melania Trump reportedly took a military plane to Florida, hours after Trump canceled Nancy Pelosi's flight because of the shutdown
    Bill Bostock (
    Jan 18th 2019 9:18AM

    https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...ight/23646250/

    Incidentally, congressional junkets wear many disguises, but the real reason global busybodies use Air Force planes is that it does not cost them a penny to meet with foreign leaders in order to promote democracy. The sad part is the millions of tax dollars paying for junkets every year is a mere bagatelle compared to the tens of billions of foreign aid tax dollars paying to build the gallows that will hang this country.

    As a bonus congressional degenerates on so-called fact-finding junkets can engage in their sexual perversions far from prying eyes. (The protection of a foreign government is a lot better than abusing children on a privately owned island.)
    She's not just a 'member of Congress', dipshit. She's 3rd in line for the presidency and, since 9/11, SOTHs have flown gov't planes.

    Please be less fucking stupid.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to CharacterAssassin For This Post:

    christiefan915 (01-18-2019)

  19. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,532
    Thanks
    65,153
    Thanked 38,090 Times in 25,663 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    I hope Nutso Nancy knows the difference between the commander in chief wife’s security and members of Congress using Air Force planes to pay for junkets.


    Melania Trump reportedly took a military plane to Florida, hours after Trump canceled Nancy Pelosi's flight because of the shutdown
    Bill Bostock (
    Jan 18th 2019 9:18AM

    https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...ight/23646250/

    Incidentally, congressional junkets wear many disguises, but the real reason global busybodies use Air Force planes is that it does not cost them a penny to meet with foreign leaders in order to promote democracy. The sad part is the millions of tax dollars paying for junkets every year is a mere bagatelle compared to the tens of billions of foreign aid tax dollars paying to build the gallows that will hang this country.

    As a bonus congressional degenerates on so-called fact-finding junkets can engage in their sexual perversions far from prying eyes. (The protection of a foreign government is a lot better than abusing children on a privately owned island.)
    I hope you're not suggesting she wouldn't be safe on a trump jet with SS protection.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  20. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    She's 3rd in line for the presidency
    To CharacterAssassin: Only an asshole would brag about 220 Democrats giving Nutso another chance at the presidency.

    . . . a dumb Democrat man says the things Nutso says, but the media lets Pelosi get away with it. Bottom line: Television will never tell the public that a woman as dumb as a horse turd is two heartbeats away from the presidency.

    NOTE: The president is the first heartbeat. The vice president is the second heartbeat.


    Present line of succession

    1 Vice President Mike Pence (R)

    2 Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi (D)

    p.s. Take a good look at the women Pelosi is moving up to the top of the Democrat Party. Their combined intellect is zero. A wag might say that Pelosi is uncomfortable being around women smarter than she is.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...86#post2806186

    After nuclear weapons were born the entire line of succession could be wiped out because they could be found in one city. So years ago I suggested changing the line; replacing the bureaucrats with state governors.

    Cabinet secretaries who once held elected positions are no exception when it comes to the line of succession.

    The federal government’s fear of everything the Tea Party advocates runs so deep they will never allow one Tea Party conservative make it into the line of succession.

    Think about it this way: Democrats and Republicans alike use bureaucracies to implement global government policies that could never be legislated; so there is not a chance a Tea Party conservative will ever head a federal bureaucracy let alone one that would place them in the line of succession where they might suddenly ascend to the presidency. For the same reason Democrats and Republicans will never replace bureaucrats with state governors as I suggested. God forbid a Tea Party governor makes it onto the line of succession by accident.

    Bureaucrats in the line of succession should be eliminated because nobody votes for them after the first three elected officials; the vice president, the speaker of the house, and the president pro tempore of the Senate.

    And have you noticed that liberals scream the loudest about the public’s sacred Right to vote for the people who govern them, yet nobody votes for the bureaucrats that might end up president.

    It got worse in 2011

    The Presidential Line-of-succession Act of 2011 added ambassadors to the line if the others are wiped out. I looked for a complete list of everybody in the current line and could not find one list that included the ambassadors first proposed by the 109th Congress. I wonder why it is such a secret?

    H.R. 1943 and S.920

    Those bills were introduced in the 109th Congress (2005-2006). Their provisions included adding the following positions to the the line-of-succession.

    Secretary of Homeland Security.

    Ambassador to the United Nations. (How does President Suzy Five Shows, President Samantha Power, and President Nikki Haley grab you?)

    Ambassador to Great Britain.

    Ambassador to Russia.

    Ambassador to China.

    Ambassador to France.

    Parenthetically, think about one of the bureaucrats who joined Hillary Clinton and Obama in betraying this country becoming president:





    Hillary Clinton: Uranium One Stories "Debunked Repeatedly"
    Posted By Tim Hains
    On Date October 23, 2017

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...epeatedly.html



    Hillary does not tell us that decisions must go through the Committee on Foreign Investment which includes executive members of the cabinet, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, and the secretary of state [Hillary Clinton at the time of the sale].

    Try this scenario: One of those bureaucrats in the line-of-succession who sold Uranium One to Russia becomes president after a nuclear bomb made from our own uranium destroys Washington.

    Incidentally, Elaine Chao McConnell ——who was born in Asia —— was in the presidential line-of-succession when she was Bush the Younger’s Secretary of Labor. It was understood that Chao, Henry Kissinger, and Madeleine Albright were not eligible when they were in the line-of-succession because they were naturalized citizens. Now that Secretary of Transportation Chao is back in the line-of-succession I can only guess she remains ineligible.

    Finally, in 2016 my wife and daughter were talking about a TV show they were following. I learned that a variation of my nuclear scenario was the plot in a TV show called DESIGNATED SURVIVOR.

    In the TV show the Capital Building is destroyed while the president is delivering a State of the Union Address opening the door for a low level bureaucrat to become president. I do not know who paid to produce that crapola, but they owe me a few bucks for stealing my idea.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To CharacterAssassin: Only an asshole would brag about 220 Democrats giving Nutso another chance at the presidency.

    . . . a dumb Democrat man says the things Nutso says, but the media lets Pelosi get away with it. Bottom line: Television will never tell the public that a woman as dumb as a horse turd is two heartbeats away from the presidency.

    NOTE: The president is the first heartbeat. The vice president is the second heartbeat.


    Present line of succession

    1 Vice President Mike Pence (R)

    2 Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi (D)

    p.s. Take a good look at the women Pelosi is moving up to the top of the Democrat Party. Their combined intellect is zero. A wag might say that Pelosi is uncomfortable being around women smarter than she is.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...86#post2806186

    After nuclear weapons were born the entire line of succession could be wiped out because they could be found in one city. So years ago I suggested changing the line; replacing the bureaucrats with state governors.

    Cabinet secretaries who once held elected positions are no exception when it comes to the line of succession.

    The federal government’s fear of everything the Tea Party advocates runs so deep they will never allow one Tea Party conservative make it into the line of succession.

    Think about it this way: Democrats and Republicans alike use bureaucracies to implement global government policies that could never be legislated; so there is not a chance a Tea Party conservative will ever head a federal bureaucracy let alone one that would place them in the line of succession where they might suddenly ascend to the presidency. For the same reason Democrats and Republicans will never replace bureaucrats with state governors as I suggested. God forbid a Tea Party governor makes it onto the line of succession by accident.

    Bureaucrats in the line of succession should be eliminated because nobody votes for them after the first three elected officials; the vice president, the speaker of the house, and the president pro tempore of the Senate.

    And have you noticed that liberals scream the loudest about the public’s sacred Right to vote for the people who govern them, yet nobody votes for the bureaucrats that might end up president.

    It got worse in 2011

    The Presidential Line-of-succession Act of 2011 added ambassadors to the line if the others are wiped out. I looked for a complete list of everybody in the current line and could not find one list that included the ambassadors first proposed by the 109th Congress. I wonder why it is such a secret?

    H.R. 1943 and S.920

    Those bills were introduced in the 109th Congress (2005-2006). Their provisions included adding the following positions to the the line-of-succession.

    Secretary of Homeland Security.

    Ambassador to the United Nations. (How does President Suzy Five Shows, President Samantha Power, and President Nikki Haley grab you?)

    Ambassador to Great Britain.

    Ambassador to Russia.

    Ambassador to China.

    Ambassador to France.

    Parenthetically, think about one of the bureaucrats who joined Hillary Clinton and Obama in betraying this country becoming president:





    Hillary Clinton: Uranium One Stories "Debunked Repeatedly"
    Posted By Tim Hains
    On Date October 23, 2017

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...epeatedly.html



    Hillary does not tell us that decisions must go through the Committee on Foreign Investment which includes executive members of the cabinet, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, and the secretary of state [Hillary Clinton at the time of the sale].

    Try this scenario: One of those bureaucrats in the line-of-succession who sold Uranium One to Russia becomes president after a nuclear bomb made from our own uranium destroys Washington.

    Incidentally, Elaine Chao McConnell ——who was born in Asia —— was in the presidential line-of-succession when she was Bush the Younger’s Secretary of Labor. It was understood that Chao, Henry Kissinger, and Madeleine Albright were not eligible when they were in the line-of-succession because they were naturalized citizens. Now that Secretary of Transportation Chao is back in the line-of-succession I can only guess she remains ineligible.

    Finally, in 2016 my wife and daughter were talking about a TV show they were following. I learned that a variation of my nuclear scenario was the plot in a TV show called DESIGNATED SURVIVOR.

    In the TV show the Capital Building is destroyed while the president is delivering a State of the Union Address opening the door for a low level bureaucrat to become president. I do not know who paid to produce that crapola, but they owe me a few bucks for stealing my idea.
    None of which is relevant to what I posted, you silly whore.

  22. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Here's my State of The Union Address;




    BTW....Does Carl remind you of anyone?
    Most Excellent.

    Would that be Biden!!
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  23. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Flanders (01-19-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. State of the Union address MAGA thread
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-31-2018, 03:51 AM
  2. Ginsburg won't attend State of the Union address
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-30-2018, 03:08 PM
  3. Obama's Last State of the Union Address
    By anatta in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-13-2016, 01:27 PM
  4. The State of the Union Address
    By Howey in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-13-2013, 06:00 PM
  5. State of the Union Address
    By Damocles in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 01-26-2012, 11:33 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •