Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: What dem candidate do republicans dislike the most?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default What dem candidate do republicans dislike the most?

    I don't ask this of dims because it is clear they absolutely hate Tulsi Gabbard who has by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.

    Whoever republicans consider the worst and least likely to beat Trump is the most likely to be nominated, which is why I ask.

    My least favorite is Kamala Harris .
    Not only is she from California but she's from San Francisco . Nothing wrong about being from Calif. or San Francisco but a dim politician from there tends to have values so far askewed from the rest of the country it's like being from a different planet.
    She's angry and unlikeable with a chip on her shoulder, kinda like IQ64 who's also from the Bay Area.
    Last edited by anonymoose; 01-16-2019 at 12:19 PM.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,510
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,555 Times in 17,085 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Reds have been programmed to hate Warren. Reds are easy to program. Much like the propaganda that the reds used on Hillary for decades.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    evince (01-16-2019)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Reds have been programmed to hate Warren.
    I'll agree with that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Reds are easy to program.
    So are dims. They were programmed to nominate hrc, the worst ever to run for president.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Much like the propaganda that the reds used on Hillary for decades.
    It worked, thank goodness. We dodged a bullet.

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    I don't ask this of dims because it is clear they absolutely hate Tulsi Gabbard who has by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.

    Whoever republicans consider the worst and least likely to beat Trump is the most likely to be nominated, which is why I ask.

    My least favorite is Kamala Harris .
    Not only is she from California but she's from San Francisco . Nothing wrong about being from Calif. or San Francisco but a dim politician from there tends to have values so far askewed from the rest of the country it's like being from a different planet.
    She's angry and unlikeable with a chip on her shoulder, kinda like IQ64 who's also from the Bay Area.
    Nah. There's no credible evidence that Gabbard has 'by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.'

    Full on Fantasy Land blathering.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to CharacterAssassin For This Post:

    evince (01-16-2019)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    Nah. There's no credible evidence that Gabbard has 'by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.'

    Full on Fantasy Land blathering.
    There's no credible evidence that anybody has the best chance to beat Trump.
    Anyway, no repub has answered. And your reply indicates to me she's definitely not one of your favorites.

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    Nah. There's no credible evidence that Gabbard has 'by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.'

    Full on Fantasy Land blathering.
    If the person the Democrat's poster child deemed the most qualified to serve as President can't be someone those same Democrats consider an idiot, no identity politics the left puts up can win. Perhaps the Democrats should find a transgender, bisexual, mixed race, hermaphrodite to run and get all of the causes rolled into one.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    There's no credible evidence that anybody has the best chance to beat Trump.
    Anyway, no repub has answered. And your reply indicates to me she's definitely not one of your favorites.
    Then why did you make that asinine claim in the first place?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to CharacterAssassin For This Post:

    evince (01-16-2019)

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    Then why did you make that asinine claim in the first place?
    it's my opinion. Nobody's opinion is credible at this point. Did I really have to say, "IMO" when it was obvious?

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    If the person the Democrat's poster child deemed the most qualified to serve as President can't be someone those same Democrats consider an idiot, no identity politics the left puts up can win. Perhaps the Democrats should find a transgender, bisexual, mixed race, hermaphrodite to run and get all of the causes rolled into one.
    That would be their dream candidate. Unfortunately none meeting those qualifications has showed interest.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,510
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,555 Times in 17,085 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    I'll agree with that. So are dims. They were programmed to nominate hrc, the worst ever to run for president. It worked, thank goodness. We dodged a bullet.
    Sorry, but they were actually allowing Bernie to debate her on their dime. Hillary had great experience and education. She was a very good candidate who the Red machine attacked for decades. Trump is a big fat joke. 2 years in and he had lots of openings in his admin that he cannot even fill. He has put lobbyists in charge of departments that used to regulate them. And he shiut down the fucking government. How bad can it get? Hang on, Daffy will show you.

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Sorry, but they were actually allowing Bernie to debate her on their dime.
    hrc is a '90's relic that figured a self proclaimed socialist had no chance. She figured he be considered the "silly Marxist". She miscalculated, otherwise she wouldn't have allowed Bernie in the debates.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Hillary had great experience and education.
    So did Nixon. What's the point?
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    She was a very good candidate who the Red machine attacked for decades.
    If she was so good why couldn't she win and win easily against a clown like Trump?
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Trump is a big fat joke.
    Yet he won. You might want to think about who you nominated.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    How bad can it get? Hang on, Daffy will show you.
    Admittedly it's bad. Has been for a while. About 18 yrs.

Similar Threads

  1. Poll: Growing Number of Republicans Dislike GOP
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-01-2013, 05:10 PM
  2. Is this the Republicans Next Presidential Candidate?
    By Robo in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2013, 06:21 AM
  3. Are Republicans happy with their presidential candidate?
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-20-2012, 08:03 AM
  4. Republicans block Black candidate
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 09-24-2011, 05:54 AM
  5. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 06-08-2008, 11:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •