Originally Posted by
LV426
Flash, you are the one who brought the 1%'s share of AGI into this debate.
You did that to try and show that they're paying a fair proportionate share of taxes.
But I said "not so fast"...what was their income gain over that period. In other words, what is the context here?
The context tells us everything about the situation.
If you show that the 1%'s share of AGI in 1980 is lower than their share of AGI in 2015, then that serves my point that they enjoyed the income gains, and thus, should pay a higher share of taxes because of it.
You hold that information back because you know it will make my case.
That's why you're a fucking fraud.
OMG, are you STILL trying to raise my taxes, someone put this nut-bags panties in his mouth already
This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT
C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network
Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you
Bookmarks