Yes, they did pay more in taxes back then. Particularly corporate taxes.
US_Effective_Corporate_Tax_Rate_1947-2011_v2.jpg
Yes, they did pay more in taxes back then. Particularly corporate taxes.
US_Effective_Corporate_Tax_Rate_1947-2011_v2.jpg
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2019)
Phantasmal (01-16-2019), TTQ64 (01-16-2019)
TOP (01-16-2019)
ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2019)
So after losing the argument on marginal rates, you now shift the goalposts to talk effective rates.
Well, effective tax rates for corporations were much higher than they are now.
US_Effective_Corporate_Tax_Rate_1947-2011_v2.jpg
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Also, the effective tax rate was higher in the 50's -when the top rate was 90%- than it is today...it was about 6% higher back then.
Average-Effective-Tax-Rate-on-the-Top-1-Percent-of-U.S.-Households.jpg
Effective Tax Rate 1950's: Approximately 42%
Effective Tax Rate 2014: Approximately 36%
So the effective rate was higher...unless numbers don't have value anymore because otherwise Conservatives can't make arguments.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Name one single deduction from 1946-1981 that prevented any rich person from paying the top rate.
Just one.
I don't think you can do that.
You're just repeating bullshit you gleaned that confirms your bias, aren't you? You do that a lot, you know. It's kinda your habit.
So if no one paid the rate back then, what's the harm in raising it back to that rate today?
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Phantasmal (01-16-2019)
Dems need to put a 70% top tax in their 2020 platform
Bookmarks