Originally Posted by
LV426
So here's another great example of how you lie in the most insidious way possible.
You present a number, in a vacuum, and try to establish that as the source of the debate.
But the debate isn't about what their share of the AGI is in 2015, the debate is about how their share grew from what it was in 1980 to what it was in 2015.
That is what you leave out; the context.
And it's obvious why you leave that context out...because if you included it, you would have to show that the 1%'s share of AGI in 2015 is much, much higher than what their share was in 1980. Because of that, you can show how much their share of the AGI grew over the 35 years of trickle down Consertvative economics.
By leaving that context out, you inadvertently do two things:
1) Prove my point that you act in bad faith.
2) Undermine and discredit your own argument.
So again, I have to ask why do you do that?
I really believe it's a mental illness thing with you. I think you are mentally ill. No one would stoop to levels that low, and no one would employ bad faith tactics that insidious unless they were mentally ill.
Bookmarks