Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: Kamala Harris and the Religious Test of the 'New Liberalism'

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    19,484
    Thanks
    5,901
    Thanked 9,842 Times in 7,170 Posts
    Groans
    133
    Groaned 1,088 Times in 1,025 Posts

    Default Kamala Harris and the Religious Test of the 'New Liberalism'

    Kamala Harris is set to announce her candidacy for president sometime around Martin Luther King Jr. Day. What sort of chief executive would she be? Well, here's your first clue: On December 5, Harris posed a series of written questions to Brian Buescher, President Trump's nominee for District Court in Nebraska. The third question reads as follows:

    Since 1993, you have been a member of the Knights of Columbus, an all-male society comprised primarily of Catholic men. In 2016, Carl Anderson, leader of the Knights of Columbus, described abortion as ‘a legal regime that has resulted in more than 40 million deaths.' Mr. Anderson went on to say that ‘abortion is the killing of the innocent on a massive scale.' Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman's right to choose when you joined the organization?

    Harris wasn't finished. Follow-ups included "Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed marriage equality when you joined the organization?" and "Have you ever, in any way, assisted with or contributed to advocacy against women's reproductive rights?"

    Buescher, a Nebraska native and graduate of the Georgetown Law Center, replied that he joined the Knights when he was 18 years old; that his involvement includes charitable work; and that his job as a judge is to apply the law regardless of his personal convictions. Strong answers. That he had to offer them is a disgrace.

    What Kamala Harris is suggesting is that membership in a 2 million-strong, 136-year-old Catholic social organization disqualifies an individual from the federal bench. She was joined in this line of questioning by Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii. The even worse news is that plenty of Senate Democrats agree with them. They've adopted a strategy of interrogating President Trump's judicial nominees about Catholic beliefs and associations. It began in September 2017 when Dianne Feinstein told Amy Coney Barrett, now confirmed to the Seventh Circuit, "The dogma lives loudly within you, and that's a concern."

    My concern is the anti-Catholic sentiment manifest in the Democratic Party. Last March, Feinstein demanded to know if Michael Scudder, now confirmed to the Seventh Circuit, worked with his parish "to establish a residential crisis pregnancy center." Last May, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island asked Peter J. Phipps, now confirmed as a district court judge, about the Knights. Last October, Feinstein, Harris, and three other Democrats wanted to know about the relationship between Fourth Circuit nominee Allison Jones Rushing and the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian nonprofit that supports religious liberty. Last November, Feinstein asked Third Circuit nominee Paul Matey, "If confirmed, will you recuse yourself from all cases in which the Knights of Columbus have taken a position?"

    Nor is it only Catholics who are subject to this religious test.
    The Democrats are ecumenical: Baptists and Episcopalians are also under scrutiny. In June 2017, Bernie Sanders clashed with Russell Vought, now acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, over a blog post Vought had written regarding Islam that several Muslim groups considered Islamophobic. "I'm a Christian, and I believe in a Christian set of principles based on my faith," Vought said. By the end of the exchange, Sanders said, "I would simply say, Mr. Chairman, that this nominee is really not someone who is what this country is supposed to be about." Vought is an elder in his church, married, and has two daughters.

    The following month, in questions to Trevor McFadden, now confirmed to D.C. district court, Whitehouse singled out McFadden's church, Falls Church Anglican, for its opposition to same-sex marriage. Whitehouse asked if McFadden agreed with statements made by his pastor. "It would be improper for me to state my personal opinions," McFadden responded in writing. "If I am confirmed as a judge, I will faithfully apply the applicable Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit precedents, including Obergefell v. Hodges." That wasn't enough for Whitehouse. What he was after was confession, repudiation, and repentance.

    So committed are these Senate Democrats to the doctrines of social liberalism that they are prepared to ignore the plain text of Article Six, Section Three, of the Constitution: "[N]o religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or Public Trust under the United States." Or is this another part of America's founding document that "evolving standards of decency" compel us to shunt aside?

    More than religious freedom is under attack in the controversy over the Knights. So is the freedom of association. In the midst of a social crisis that involves drug and alcohol abuse, suicide, depression, and loneliness, progressive Democrats seek to delegitimize the very organizations that promote community, connection, charity, and meaning.

    The ‘new liberalism‘ that is said to be ascendant in the Democratic Party undermines these twin pillars of American exceptionalism—religion and civil society—to advance the (quite brittle) cultural consensus that reigns in the megalopolis.

    No longer is the debate over Christianity in the public square. It is over Christians in the public square.
    https://freebeacon.com/columns/the-o...s-of-columbus/

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Bigdog (01-11-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    55,689
    Thanks
    3,882
    Thanked 14,111 Times in 9,652 Posts
    Groans
    242
    Groaned 1,698 Times in 1,571 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It’s not the Catholic religion she opposed, it’s the fringe anti-woman group he joined.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (01-11-2019), LV426 (01-11-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    19,484
    Thanks
    5,901
    Thanked 9,842 Times in 7,170 Posts
    Groans
    133
    Groaned 1,088 Times in 1,025 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    It’s not the Catholic religion she opposed, it’s the fringe anti-woman group he joined.
    ROFL.. Knights of Columbus is fringe anti-woman?

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    anonymoose (01-11-2019), Bigdog (01-11-2019), Dark Soul (01-11-2019)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America "clinging to my God and Guns"
    Posts
    9,077
    Thanks
    887
    Thanked 5,521 Times in 4,102 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 154 Times in 147 Posts

    Default

    Good thing he wasn't a member of the NRA...
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Bigdog (01-11-2019), dukkha (01-11-2019)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    23,566
    Thanks
    13,782
    Thanked 6,789 Times in 5,475 Posts
    Groans
    1,868
    Groaned 985 Times in 896 Posts

    Default

    So they hate Catholics again.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Dark Soul For This Post:

    Bigdog (01-11-2019)

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,497
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Another one who won't get anywhere. Two years is waaaaaaaay too early for a serious contender to announce.

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,219
    Thanks
    55,400
    Thanked 23,797 Times in 15,740 Posts
    Groans
    1,749
    Groaned 2,052 Times in 1,925 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    Another one who won't get anywhere. Two years is waaaaaaaay too early for a serious contender to announce.
    Primaries start June 2019. It’s not two years.
    That’s why I’m so screwed up, because I had a father who pushed me so hard,” Trump acknowledged in 2007, in a brief and rare moment of self-awareness.

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    10,761
    Thanks
    1,402
    Thanked 5,224 Times in 3,377 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,165 Times in 1,041 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Wingers FEAR Kamala, always have

    something about truth-tellers really bunches those panties

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,497
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Primaries start June 2019. It’s not two years.
    Who the hell is having a primary in June 2019? The Iowa caucus isn't until February 2020

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    55,689
    Thanks
    3,882
    Thanked 14,111 Times in 9,652 Posts
    Groans
    242
    Groaned 1,698 Times in 1,571 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Harris is my candidate, she reminds me of Obama a lot.
    4,487

    Liberals... if you want to read something funny... https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...arah-Barracuda

    "The Government will not be open until we have a wall" - DJT

    January 11, 2016 - “I have no deals in Russia, I have no deals that could have been in Russia.”

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    10,954
    Thanks
    8,367
    Thanked 4,554 Times in 3,322 Posts
    Groans
    257
    Groaned 236 Times in 221 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Soul View Post
    So they hate Catholics again.
    Correction ... "still" hate Catholics. Only nowadays, at least they are forced to stop lynching Catholics.

    Of course millenials don't even know that the Deomcrat Socialist KKK was into lynching and killing Catholics. The millenials just know they are supposed to hate Catholics ... unless they are Black or homo.
    I condemn the National Socialist German Workers Party, the Socialist Democrat Hate Whitey Party,... and Socialist Workers party heroes, Mao, Chavez, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Stalin, Castro and Kim Jung Un.

    Liberal Racist code: Orange is the New White

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Bigdog For This Post:

    Dark Soul (01-11-2019)

  18. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    3,751
    Thanks
    1,017
    Thanked 1,115 Times in 808 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 219 Times in 208 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    Kamala Harris is set to announce her candidacy for president sometime around Martin Luther King Jr. Day. What sort of chief executive would she be? Well, here's your first clue: On December 5, Harris posed a series of written questions to Brian Buescher, President Trump's nominee for District Court in Nebraska. The third question reads as follows:

    Since 1993, you have been a member of the Knights of Columbus, an all-male society comprised primarily of Catholic men. In 2016, Carl Anderson, leader of the Knights of Columbus, described abortion as ‘a legal regime that has resulted in more than 40 million deaths.' Mr. Anderson went on to say that ‘abortion is the killing of the innocent on a massive scale.' Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman's right to choose when you joined the organization?

    Harris wasn't finished. Follow-ups included "Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed marriage equality when you joined the organization?" and "Have you ever, in any way, assisted with or contributed to advocacy against women's reproductive rights?"

    Buescher, a Nebraska native and graduate of the Georgetown Law Center, replied that he joined the Knights when he was 18 years old; that his involvement includes charitable work; and that his job as a judge is to apply the law regardless of his personal convictions. Strong answers. That he had to offer them is a disgrace.

    What Kamala Harris is suggesting is that membership in a 2 million-strong, 136-year-old Catholic social organization disqualifies an individual from the federal bench. She was joined in this line of questioning by Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii. The even worse news is that plenty of Senate Democrats agree with them. They've adopted a strategy of interrogating President Trump's judicial nominees about Catholic beliefs and associations. It began in September 2017 when Dianne Feinstein told Amy Coney Barrett, now confirmed to the Seventh Circuit, "The dogma lives loudly within you, and that's a concern."

    My concern is the anti-Catholic sentiment manifest in the Democratic Party. Last March, Feinstein demanded to know if Michael Scudder, now confirmed to the Seventh Circuit, worked with his parish "to establish a residential crisis pregnancy center." Last May, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island asked Peter J. Phipps, now confirmed as a district court judge, about the Knights. Last October, Feinstein, Harris, and three other Democrats wanted to know about the relationship between Fourth Circuit nominee Allison Jones Rushing and the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian nonprofit that supports religious liberty. Last November, Feinstein asked Third Circuit nominee Paul Matey, "If confirmed, will you recuse yourself from all cases in which the Knights of Columbus have taken a position?"

    Nor is it only Catholics who are subject to this religious test.
    The Democrats are ecumenical: Baptists and Episcopalians are also under scrutiny. In June 2017, Bernie Sanders clashed with Russell Vought, now acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, over a blog post Vought had written regarding Islam that several Muslim groups considered Islamophobic. "I'm a Christian, and I believe in a Christian set of principles based on my faith," Vought said. By the end of the exchange, Sanders said, "I would simply say, Mr. Chairman, that this nominee is really not someone who is what this country is supposed to be about." Vought is an elder in his church, married, and has two daughters.

    The following month, in questions to Trevor McFadden, now confirmed to D.C. district court, Whitehouse singled out McFadden's church, Falls Church Anglican, for its opposition to same-sex marriage. Whitehouse asked if McFadden agreed with statements made by his pastor. "It would be improper for me to state my personal opinions," McFadden responded in writing. "If I am confirmed as a judge, I will faithfully apply the applicable Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit precedents, including Obergefell v. Hodges." That wasn't enough for Whitehouse. What he was after was confession, repudiation, and repentance.

    So committed are these Senate Democrats to the doctrines of social liberalism that they are prepared to ignore the plain text of Article Six, Section Three, of the Constitution: "[N]o religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or Public Trust under the United States." Or is this another part of America's founding document that "evolving standards of decency" compel us to shunt aside?

    More than religious freedom is under attack in the controversy over the Knights. So is the freedom of association. In the midst of a social crisis that involves drug and alcohol abuse, suicide, depression, and loneliness, progressive Democrats seek to delegitimize the very organizations that promote community, connection, charity, and meaning.

    The ‘new liberalism‘ that is said to be ascendant in the Democratic Party undermines these twin pillars of American exceptionalism—religion and civil society—to advance the (quite brittle) cultural consensus that reigns in the megalopolis.

    No longer is the debate over Christianity in the public square. It is over Christians in the public square.
    https://freebeacon.com/columns/the-o...s-of-columbus/
    That's not a religious test, chucklefuck.

    Please sober up and try again.

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    17,994
    Thanks
    1,934
    Thanked 10,463 Times in 6,460 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 234 Times in 215 Posts

    Default

    If you don't like her, then don't Vote for her ...
    Trump isn't our 45th American president; he's our 1st Russian one.

    Remember this on Tuesday November 3rd, 2020

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    55,689
    Thanks
    3,882
    Thanked 14,111 Times in 9,652 Posts
    Groans
    242
    Groaned 1,698 Times in 1,571 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    How is it a religious test?

    Now, if she had said Muslims cant serve in elected offices, that would be a religious test.
    4,487

    Liberals... if you want to read something funny... https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...arah-Barracuda

    "The Government will not be open until we have a wall" - DJT

    January 11, 2016 - “I have no deals in Russia, I have no deals that could have been in Russia.”

  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    2,951
    Thanks
    1,069
    Thanked 1,949 Times in 1,293 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 77 Times in 67 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    Another one who won't get anywhere.
    With dims she might. She's very, very fringy.
    Clinton begat Bush Jr, Bush Jr. begat Obama, Obama begat Trump, I'm afraid Trump will sire someone even more extreme. No end in sight.

Similar Threads

  1. Kamala Harris and a 21st century example of McCarthyism
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-19-2018, 11:59 AM
  2. Kamala Harris draws parallel between ICE and the KKK
    By dukkha in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-17-2018, 05:25 AM
  3. Is Kamala Harris Eligible to be President?
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-20-2018, 10:47 PM
  4. Kamala Harris and the Bernie wing
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-01-2017, 09:52 AM
  5. Kamala Harris and Women's Rights
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-22-2017, 02:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •