Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: TV drug ads may have to zoom in on side effects

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default TV drug ads may have to zoom in on side effects

    TV drug ads may have to zoom in on side effects

    Thursday May 15, 2:12 PM EDT

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Would consumers get the same warm, fuzzy message from a drug advertisement that promised to lift their mood if it also urged them to report side effects like suicidal thoughts and diarrhea?

    Under a proposal regulators will consider Friday, that buyer-be-vigilant message would have to accompany the rosy messages of pharmaceutical promotions.

    The Food and Drug Administration is considering requiring TV drug advertisements to carry a toll-free number where patients can report serious problems with their medication. FDA will consult a panel of outside communication experts Friday about whether displaying that language could distract viewers from other important information.

    TV promotions have become a cornerstone of the pharmaceutical business since regulators opened the floodgate a decade ago. Companies spent roughly $3.5 billion on spots last year.

    But some lawmakers and consumer advocates say the advertisements can encourage over-prescribing of medications before all their side effects are known. By encouraging patients to report negative reactions to FDA, they hope regulators will be able to catch drug safety problems sooner.

    http://finance.myway.com/jsp/nw/nwdt...&date=20080515

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,455
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I thought they already did have to state the side effects -- perhaps now they have to emphasize them more.

    I have a big problem with those ads for prescription drugs being aimed at consumers anyway. The average patient just gulps whatever the physician tells him/her to take without question, and is not in the least informed about pharmacology and which, if any, drugs might or might not be appropriate or even needed at all.

    Then there are these caveats, like "tell your doctor if you have kidney disease ..." Um, if you have kidney disease it's pretty likely that your physician knows this, dontcha think?

    Personally I'd like to see all those ads pulled.

    Also ads for nonprescription drugs/treatments, etc., don't state clearly that they aren't FDA-approved, or what sort of testing, if any, led to their claims. Ideally I'd like to see a better informed public (right, that's going to happen) who questions these claims.
    My goal in life is to be as good a person as my dog thinks I am.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Yep and it only became legal for the commercials about 10 years ago. More fo the results of undoing intelligent regulation in the name of profit.

Similar Threads

  1. All the ill effects from this will be blamed on smokers.
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-20-2008, 09:21 PM
  2. Which party do you usually side with?
    By KingRaw! in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-04-2008, 12:43 AM
  3. Top Drug Cop Indicted on Drug Charges
    By Timshel in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-20-2007, 07:54 PM
  4. Another Side
    By Annie in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-17-2007, 06:53 AM
  5. Tony Snow: "Carnage and progress [are] existing side by side."
    By Prakosh in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-20-2006, 02:43 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •