Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910
Results 136 to 148 of 148

Thread: Why do Democrats like to kill babies?

  1. #136 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Margaret Sanger


    She even presented at a Ku Klux Klan rally in 1926 in Silver Lake, N.J. She recounted this event in her autobiography:

    "I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan ... I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses ... I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak ... In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered" (Margaret Sanger, "An Autobiography," Page 366). That she generated enthusiasm among some of America's leading racists says something about the content and tone of her remarks.

    In a letter to Clarence Gable in 1939, Sanger wrote:

    "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members" (Margaret Sanger commenting on the 'Negro Project' in a letter to Gamble, Dec. 10, 1939).

    https://www.frc.org/op-eds/margaret-...extraordinaire
    The eugenicist drivel so popular as 'scientific' back then affected all sorts of people, including Hitler. That's why it's important to grow up and use our heads, not live in the past like a lot of Republicans.

  2. #137 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by guno View Post
    A video that compares abortion to the Holocaust was shown in March at a Catholic high school in Red Deer, Alberta, as part of a presentation by the anti-choice group Red Deer and Area Pro Life. Yes, that's right -- women who have abortions are equivalent to genocidal Nazis.

    Not only is this comparison denigrating to women, it's a callous and thoughtless exploitation of the Holocaust. Frankly, it's anti-Semitic.

    fuck the filthy subhuman goyim
    Those women are killing their INNOCENT unborn babies in a violent manner. Are you arguing that the Jews or the babies weren't/aren't innocent?

    A woman that would spread her legs knowing what could happen then kill the results because she doesn't like what happened needs no one denigrating them. They denigrate themselves by what they do.

  3. #138 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,852
    Thanks
    13,246
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    No. But what's the relevance of that to our discussion?
    what is the relevance of an historical poll about abortion to a discussion of the history of polls in a thread about abortion?.....gosh, now you have me stumped.......

  4. #139 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,852
    Thanks
    13,246
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iolo View Post
    PostmodernProphet, doubtless, has had to carry innumerable small rabbis for nine months. That'll be what has made for the confusion!
    rabbis take a lot longer than nine months to come to term.........it can be decades......atheists are relatively easy.......I drop one of those every morning unless I'm a bit constipated........

  5. #140 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,931
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,544 Times in 9,995 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iolo View Post
    The eugenicist drivel so popular as 'scientific' back then affected all sorts of people, including Hitler. That's why it's important to grow up and use our heads, not live in the past like a lot of Republicans.
    not live in the past?

    So the blacks should just GET OVER slavery and Jim Crow etc? Glad to see u agree!

  6. #141 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    not live in the past?

    So the blacks should just GET OVER slavery and Jim Crow etc? Glad to see u agree!
    No - they should be given at least all the Southern States in compensation, surely, and all current racists made their slaves?

  7. #142 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iolo View Post
    No - they should be given at least all the Southern States in compensation, surely, and all current racists made their slaves?
    Anytime someone that was a slave wants to be compensated have them ask someone that owned slaves for the money. The reparations nonsense is nothing more than those that were never slaves demanding something paid for by those that didn't own slaves. My family didn't own slaves. How much should we pay for something we didn't do?

  8. #143 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,543
    Thanks
    441
    Thanked 1,874 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 202 Times in 195 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Apparently you can't prove your assertions by any any acceptable evidential standard.
    I definitely can. I can't prove my assertions by YOUR evidentiary standards, because the only standard you observe is whether or not something harmonizes with your prejudices. We've been down this road: I present a wall of evidence taken from non-partisan sources and definitively proving the point. Then you respond with a one-line post saying "Is that so?" Why would I bother. Whether it's because you're illiterate or simply not interested in learning, there's nothing I could post that would convince you of anything. Wouldn't my time be better spent on the smarter posters?

  9. #144 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,543
    Thanks
    441
    Thanked 1,874 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 202 Times in 195 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    .....gosh, now you have me stumped.......
    Well, if you figure it out, let me know.

  10. #145 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,852
    Thanks
    13,246
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    Well, if you figure it out, let me know.
    /whoosh.....

  11. #146 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,543
    Thanks
    441
    Thanked 1,874 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 202 Times in 195 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    /whoosh.....
    The sound your head makes when wind blows in one ear and out the other.

  12. #147 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneuli View Post
    I definitely can.
    You haven't yet.

    Do it now, if you can.

    Of course, I will understand if you cannot, naturally.

  13. #148 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,852
    Thanks
    13,246
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    I haven't seen yet any demmycrat who has explained WHY they want to kill babies.........

Similar Threads

  1. Separating BABIES from mothers that democrats fully support
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-20-2018, 06:43 AM
  2. WARNING THREAD BAN IN EFFECT: Democrat party gets paid to kill babies
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-04-2018, 08:46 AM
  3. How come no one is campaigning on the right to choose, to kill babies
    By Canceled 2016.4 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-11-2016, 07:59 AM
  4. Dogs kill babies.
    By 007 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-08-2013, 01:35 PM
  5. Guy that DOJ let go: Kill white babies!
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 08:07 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •