Althea (01-08-2019)
Althea (01-08-2019)
LV426 (01-08-2019)
Is that a fact? Who told you that?
Isn't it true that Facebook admitted that only about 100 Russian ads opposed your beloved HRC?
Only about 100 of the ads overtly mentioned support for Donald Trump or opposition to Hillary Clinton
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/05/11/what-we-found-facebook-ads-russians-accused-election-meddling/602319002/
I'm just trying to get some sort of read on what the fu@k they are talking about, 100 million dollars, and two years later, and not one liberal I know or chat with has came anywhere close to explaining to me what Mueller is finding.
Like it is some dream of theirs Mueller has this bombshell that no one knows about, like no one would have leaked anything, or even spit out a plausible theory. yea right.
And jarod the wonder boy comes up with "Da Russians targeted key groups on social media" and colluded with Trump to do it
it's like watching a Will Farrell movie
This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT
C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network
Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you
Among the findings:
- Of the roughly 3,500 ads published this week, more than half — about 1,950 — made express references to race. Those accounted for 25 million ad impressions — a measure of how many times the spot was pulled from a server for transmission to a device.
- At least 25% of the ads centered on issues involving crime and policing, often with a racial connotation. Separate ads, launched simultaneously, would stoke suspicion about how police treat black people in one ad, while another encouraged support for pro-police groups.
- Divisive racial ad buys averaged about 44 per month from 2015 through the summer of 2016 before seeing a significant increase in the run-up to Election Day. Between September and November 2016, the number of race-related spots rose to 400. An additional 900 were posted after the November election through May 2017.
You've been told plenty of times, you're just refusing to accept it because your ego is too fragile.
Trump conspired with Russia to win the election so he could ease sanctions (like he did with Deripaska) and cede foreign policy to Russia (as he attempted to do in Syria) in exchange for getting permission from Putin to license his brand on a tower in Moscow, which has been his aspiration for decades. The GOP knew about this and was in on it, with Mitch McConnell accepting $2.5M for his Senate Leadership PAC from companies owned by Russian Oligarchs while threatening Obama with partisanship if Obama went public with what they knew back in August-September 2016.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
LV426 (01-08-2019)
Again, plenty has been given, but you're either a sophist or you're too lazy to accept any of it.
But it's cool, because we know what's gonna happen. He's going to quit or be forced out, then this ID of yours will disappear and be replaced by a brand new one that argues the same policies, just with a different voice. But because you're too lazy, stupid, and sloppy, you'll eventually slip and reveal who you are. Then the process begins all over again. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
That's what will happen because that's what happened 10 years ago after Bush.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
evince (01-08-2019)
Depends what kind of data it was. Some you can get from the net, some deeper stuff you can't. Presumably this was the latter kind.
A more interesting question is: why did Manafort lie about it, and how did Mueller know he was lying? Not from Kilimnik, he's in Russia.
evince (01-08-2019)
Bookmarks