SCHIFF goes after witnesses who lied/those not called/evidence & report NUNES buried

[Centerleftfl]

Remember NUNES, Trump's 'dicksucker', refused to release his own report. He refused to call in witnesses that Democrats knew needed to be called in. He knew several WITNESSES WERE LYING and refused to allow others to be brought back for additional questioning. And, he told other witnesses they didn't have to COME IN at all.

SCHIFF IS TURNING OVER THE HOUSE TESTIMONY TO MUELLER. Nunes wouldn't!

That's a good start!!


Schiff to target potential perjury during Congress’ Russia probe

By VICTORIA GUIDA - POLITICO
01/06/2019 10:49 AM EST

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Sunday that he wants to work with special counsel Robert Mueller to determine whether any witnesses who have testified before his panel have committed perjury.

Mueller and the House Intelligence Committee have conducted separate investigations into Russia’s interference in the 2016 president election.

Schiff said one of his first acts as chairman would be to share the transcripts of relevant congressional testimony with the special counsel, “including for the bringing of perjury charges, if necessary, against any of the witnesses, but also to see the evidence that they contain.”

“I don’t want to go into enumerating particularly who I have concerns about, but I do have concerns about certainly multiple witnesses,” Schiff told host Jake Tapper on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“Bob Mueller, by virtue of the fact that he has been able to conduct this investigation using tools that we didn’t have in our committee, meaning compulsion, is in a better position to determine, OK, who was telling the truth?” Schiff said. “Who wasn’t? And who can I make a case against in terms of perjury?”

He said certain people might have felt like they had “some kind of immunity” when Republicans were in control of the committee, with lawmakers intervening to tell witnesses they don’t have to answer certain questions or appear at all.

“There’s no reason to protect these witnesses,” Schiff said. “There’s every reason to validate Congress’ interest in not having people come before it and lie.”...


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...-probe-1082838

[Centerleftfl]

By the way this from NUNES hometown paper. The Fresno Bee, Opinion section Oct. 2018


No one really expected President Donald Trump, who benefited from Russia’s 2016 election interference, to counter that hostile regime’s active measures: Russia wanted him to win, and when they hacked, he invited them to hack more.

But America should have been able to rely on a united Congress to ensure that our next elections aren’t just as vulnerable if not more so. Instead, due to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes’ persistent and pernicious obstruction, America has been spectacularly let down.

[Jack]

"Remember NUNES, Trump's 'dicksucker'"

Yes. I remember him. (I wonder how he's feeling NOW?)

[Bourbon]

Game-Time

[jimmymccready]

Nunes can be indicted as an accessory to perjury.

[Centerleftfl]

"Remember NUNES, Trump's 'dicksucker'"

Yes. I remember him. (I wonder how he's feeling NOW?)

He needs to be brought up on ETHICS charges--maybe WORSE!

[Centerleftfl]

Nunes can be indicted as an accessory to perjury.

I think it might be worse. Remember he went running to the WH with the FISA information about FLYNN. That sounds like obstruction of justice to me. I think it's traitorous for a congressman to do that! TELLING WITNESS THEY DIDN'T HAVE TESTIFY is more obstruction of justice.

Does ANYONE know if he made witnesses take the oath? I was under the impression, he did not. Or didn't FOR CERTAIN WITNESSES.

[Centerleftfl]

"Remember NUNES, Trump's 'dicksucker'"

Yes. I remember him. (I wonder how he's feeling NOW?)

I just found this little gem buried in a New Yorker article (dated DEC18). I don't know who they are and how much clout they do or don't have but I guess formal paperwork has originated.

” The government watchdog Campaign for Accountability has filed complaints against Nunes for leaking confidential information from the ongoing Russia investigation."

[Truth Detector]

Remember NUNES, Trump's 'dicksucker', refused to release his own report. He refused to call in witnesses that Democrats knew needed to be called in. He knew several WITNESSES WERE LYING and refused to allow others to be brought back for additional questioning. And, he told other witnesses they didn't have to COME IN at all.

SCHIFF IS TURNING OVER THE HOUSE TESTIMONY TO MUELLER. Nunes wouldn't!

Schiff is a lying moron on steroids. Only morons think there is anything to the idiotic notion that Russians are the reason Hillary lost. You sit at the top of the pile when it comes to morons.

[Truth Detector]

By the way this from NUNES hometown paper. The Fresno Bee, Opinion section Oct. 2018


No one really expected President Donald Trump, who benefited from Russia’s 2016 election interference, to counter that hostile regime’s active measures: Russia wanted him to win, and when they hacked, he invited them to hack more.

But America should have been able to rely on a united Congress to ensure that our next elections aren’t just as vulnerable if not more so. Instead, due to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes’ persistent and pernicious obstruction, America has been spectacularly let down.

By the way, the guy who was supposed to ensure that the 2016 elections weren't vulnerable would have been Obama. Why aren't you morons demanding that he be investigated?

Obama: Trump's Rigged Election Comments are 'Ridiculous'

[Truth Detector]

Nunes can be indicted as an accessory to perjury.

No he cannot. Nunes has done nothing wrong and we still are not the third world Fascist shit hole you brain dead leftist twits want to turn us into.

[canceled.2021.1]

Remember NUNES, Trump's 'dicksucker', refused to release his own report. He refused to call in witnesses that Democrats knew needed to be called in. He knew several WITNESSES WERE LYING and refused to allow others to be brought back for additional questioning. And, he told other witnesses they didn't have to COME IN at all.

SCHIFF IS TURNING OVER THE HOUSE TESTIMONY TO MUELLER. Nunes wouldn't!

That's a good start!!


Schiff to target potential perjury during Congress’ Russia probe

By VICTORIA GUIDA - POLITICO
01/06/2019 10:49 AM EST

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Sunday that he wants to work with special counsel Robert Mueller to determine whether any witnesses who have testified before his panel have committed perjury.

Mueller and the House Intelligence Committee have conducted separate investigations into Russia’s interference in the 2016 president election.

Schiff said one of his first acts as chairman would be to share the transcripts of relevant congressional testimony with the special counsel, “including for the bringing of perjury charges, if necessary, against any of the witnesses, but also to see the evidence that they contain.”

“I don’t want to go into enumerating particularly who I have concerns about, but I do have concerns about certainly multiple witnesses,” Schiff told host Jake Tapper on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“Bob Mueller, by virtue of the fact that he has been able to conduct this investigation using tools that we didn’t have in our committee, meaning compulsion, is in a better position to determine, OK, who was telling the truth?” Schiff said. “Who wasn’t? And who can I make a case against in terms of perjury?”

He said certain people might have felt like they had “some kind of immunity” when Republicans were in control of the committee, with lawmakers intervening to tell witnesses they don’t have to answer certain questions or appear at all.

“There’s no reason to protect these witnesses,” Schiff said. “There’s every reason to validate Congress’ interest in not having people come before it and lie.”...


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...-probe-1082838

Do you want fries with your nothing burger?

[Truth Detector]

I just found this little gem buried in a New Yorker article (dated DEC18). I don't know who they are and how much clout they do or don't have but I guess formal paperwork has originated.

” The government watchdog Campaign for Accountability has filed complaints against Nunes for leaking confidential information from the ongoing Russia investigation."

New Yorker?

[Centerleftfl]

Schiff is a lying moron on steroids. Only morons think there is anything to the idiotic notion that Russians are the reason Hillary lost. You sit at the top of the pile when it comes to morons.

You are fool. We are SOOOO past that denial of fact, one has had to have been in coma or had their head up their asses for 15 MONTHS.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Centerleftfl,

Remember NUNES, Trump's 'dicksucker', refused to release his own report. He refused to call in witnesses that Democrats knew needed to be called in. He knew several WITNESSES WERE LYING and refused to allow others to be brought back for additional questioning. And, he told other witnesses they didn't have to COME IN at all.

SCHIFF IS TURNING OVER THE HOUSE TESTIMONY TO MUELLER. Nunes wouldn't!

That's a good start!!


Schiff to target potential perjury during Congress’ Russia probe

By VICTORIA GUIDA - POLITICO
01/06/2019 10:49 AM EST

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Sunday that he wants to work with special counsel Robert Mueller to determine whether any witnesses who have testified before his panel have committed perjury.

Mueller and the House Intelligence Committee have conducted separate investigations into Russia’s interference in the 2016 president election.

Schiff said one of his first acts as chairman would be to share the transcripts of relevant congressional testimony with the special counsel, “including for the bringing of perjury charges, if necessary, against any of the witnesses, but also to see the evidence that they contain.”

“I don’t want to go into enumerating particularly who I have concerns about, but I do have concerns about certainly multiple witnesses,” Schiff told host Jake Tapper on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“Bob Mueller, by virtue of the fact that he has been able to conduct this investigation using tools that we didn’t have in our committee, meaning compulsion, is in a better position to determine, OK, who was telling the truth?” Schiff said. “Who wasn’t? And who can I make a case against in terms of perjury?”

He said certain people might have felt like they had “some kind of immunity” when Republicans were in control of the committee, with lawmakers intervening to tell witnesses they don’t have to answer certain questions or appear at all.

“There’s no reason to protect these witnesses,” Schiff said. “There’s every reason to validate Congress’ interest in not having people come before it and lie.”...


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...-probe-1082838

The wheels are coming off the Trump wagon.

Squeak! Squeak!