Just When I Have a Glimmer of Hope for Dim Candidates...

[anonymoose]

...they go right back to their same mistakes.

Hillary Clinton is meeting with possible 2020 Democrats

(CNN)The race to court Hillary Clinton has begun.

The former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee has talked about the 2020 election with Sen. Kamala Harris, Sen. Cory Booker, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, according to two sources close to Clinton, and there are plans for her to talk with other contenders.

The meetings with Clinton are a sign that potential Democratic presidential candidates see value in her endorsement.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/04/polit...ngs/index.html

For me an endorsement by hrc is the kiss of death.

I was actually considering re-registering as a dim to vote in their primary. Dims need voters like me as a voice of reason.
They've had good candidates in the past that were never given a chance. I was hoping with the Clintons out of the way they might now.
Dims are absolutely addicted to them, Obama included, using exceptionally poor judgement making hrc his Sect. of State. WTF was he thinking?


For now, never mind.

I will, however, consider a dim candidate that wants nothing to do with the clintons. Not sure if one exists.

[LV426]

For me an endorsement by hrc is the kiss of death.

Why is that? Because she's an accomplished public servant who, despite all your bullshit, was never brought up or found guilty of any corruption charges in the 20+ years she's been in the public eye.

I was actually considering re-registering as a dim to vote in their primary. Dims need voters like me as a voice of reason.

So after screwing up the Republican Party, you now want us to consider your thoughts for the Democratic Party?

How about this counteroffer: You fuck off because we don't need your vote, and you can sink to the bottom of the bay in the lifeboat we set on fire.

[Frank Apisa]

...they go right back to their same mistakes.



For me an endorsement by hrc is the kiss of death.

I was actually considering re-registering as a dim to vote in their primary. Dims need voters like me as a voice of reason.
They've had good candidates in the past that were never given a chance. I was hoping with the Clintons out of the way they might now.
Dims are absolutely addicted to them, Obama included, using exceptionally poor judgement making hrc his Sect. of State. WTF was he thinking?


For now, never mind.

I will, however, consider a dim candidate that wants nothing to do with the clintons. Not sure if one exists.

You mean the endorsement of the woman who got 3,000,000 more votes than the guy who won the election...

...is not worthwhile?

Jesus H. Christ.

[LV426]

I was actually considering re-registering as a dim to vote in their primary. Dims need voters like me as a voice of reason.
They've had good candidates in the past that were never given a chance. I was hoping with the Clintons out of the way they might now.
Dims are absolutely addicted to them, Obama included, using exceptionally poor judgement making hrc his Sect. of State. WTF was he thinking?

Gotta love this bullshit.

Unsolicited advice from a Trumpkin looking to float a lifeboat.

There is nothing reasonable in any of what you support or defend here, and you mistake your arrogance for prominence.

Fact is, we don't need your fucking vote.

We don't need to pander to you to get it. We can easily replace your vote with the vote of someone not acting in bad faith.

Frankly, we don't need to even hear your voice, and after supporting and defending Conservatives who were corrupted by Russia and Trump, why the fuck do you think anyone should take anything you say seriously? <--That's not a rhetorical question, I truly want to know why you think anyone should give a fuck about you or your needs?

[LV426]

You mean the endorsement of the woman who got 3,000,000 more votes than the guy who won the election...

...is not worthwhile?

Jesus H. Christ.

It's a lifeboat.

They recognize the disaster that was Trump, that they voted for and supported, and think that we value their voice and their vote.

Guess what? We don't.

We don't need people like anonymoose to win elections. We don't need their vote. We don't need their voice. We don't need to accommodate them. We don't need to pander to them. We simply don't need them and can ignore them.

Gotta love failed Conservatives offering unsolicited advice when no one asked for it, nor wants it.

[PoliTalker]

Hillary Clinton is the biggest strawman the right has ever built, aside from denying science.

[Nordberg]

Hillary was well educated. She was experienced in government. She was a Senator and Secretary of State.
Trump had Trump University. He made his overpriced crap in China and 3rd world nations.
Hillary was investigated by the Reds many times. She was found guilty of nothing. The investigations were designed to cut her polling numbers and make people think there must be a reason that she was investigated so many times. They don't understand there was, political reasons.

[MAGA MAN]

...they go right back to their same mistakes.



For me an endorsement by hrc is the kiss of death.

I was actually considering re-registering as a dim to vote in their primary. Dims need voters like me as a voice of reason.
They've had good candidates in the past that were never given a chance. I was hoping with the Clintons out of the way they might now.
Dims are absolutely addicted to them, Obama included, using exceptionally poor judgement making hrc his Sect. of State. WTF was he thinking?


For now, never mind.

I will, however, consider a dim candidate that wants nothing to do with the clintons. Not sure if one exists.

I was thinking of registering as a 'rat to vote for their worst candidate in the primary. But all 'rats suck so it would be a hard choice.

[anonymoose]

I was thinking of registering as a 'rat to vote for their worst candidate in the primary. .

No need to. They usually always take care of that themselves.

[anonymoose]

You fuck off because we don't need your vote,

If you had more like me Martin O'Malley would be our president. Who would you rather have, Trump or O'Malley?

[anonymoose]

You mean the endorsement of the woman who got 3,000,000 more votes than the guy who won the election...

...is not worthwhile?

Jesus H. Christ.

Nope. You guys chose the worst possible. That's what you do. Go figure.

[anonymoose]

We don't need people like anonymoose to win elections. We don't need their vote.

I would've voted for O'Malley . Guess you prefer Trump.

We simply don't need them and can ignore them.[/I]
.

The fact that you don't tells me you're listening - intently.

[Frank Apisa]

Nope. You guys chose the worst possible. That's what you do. Go figure.

YOUR side chose the worst one possible...and he is proving that to be so with each passing day.

Anyway...your side should be hoping that Hillary endorses as much as possible.

You think she is the kiss of death...right?

[LV426]

If you had more like me Martin O'Malley would be our president. Who would you rather have, Trump or O'Malley?

You can take your bad faith and go fuck off.

After the disaster you made of the GOP, why the fuck should the Democrats think you have anything to offer?

[LV426]

Nope. You guys chose the worst possible. That's what you do. Go figure.

No, you chose the worst possible with Trump, and you needed Russian help to do it.

Conservatives can't win elections without cheating or relying on foreigners for help.

So why the fuck do you think you have a place in the Democratic Party?

Why the fuck do you think you're owed it?

Why the fuck do you think anyone should give a shit about you?

After you got conned by Trump and Russia, what fucking judgment of yours is sound enough to lend your opinion on anything? ANYTHING?