Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 39

Thread: The Evolution Of The Party Of Liars

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default The Evolution Of The Party Of Liars

    Every item in the following steps was implemented with lies. Once implemented bigger lies became necessary in order to turn the first lie into truth; hence doublespeak and newspeak.

    The Democrat Party became the Party of Parasites in 1913 with the XVI Amendment.

    The Democrat Party became the party of democracy. (January 22, 1917)

    The Democrat Party became the Party of women in 1920. (19th Amendment)

    The Democrat Party became the party of Socialists/Communists in the 1930s.

    The Democrat Party became the party of traitors in 1945. (The United Nations)

    The Democrat Party became the party of black Americans with the Civil Rights Movement. (1950s & ‘60s)

    The Democrat Party became the party of illegal aliens in 1965. (https://cis.org/Report/Legacy-1965-Immigration-Act)

    The Democrat Party became the party of baby killers in 1973. (Roe v. Wade)

    The Democrat Party became the party of environmental parasites after the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991. (http://canadafreepress.com/article/p...m-the-pastures )

    The Democrat Party became the party of mass government-ordered murders in 1993. (Branch Davidian Compound)

    The Democrat Party became the party of homosexuals on May 17, 2004. (Massachusetts)

    The clever part is that discrediting one or two Democrat Party constituencies allows Democrats to separate their cards from the party —— the race card, the homosexual card, the woman card, the illegal alien card, and so on. In short: The Party of Liars never defends their party’s ideology in the aggregate.

    The inevitable happened when the Party of Liars realized they were left with one choice —— blame everyone for the things they are guilty of. I am not certain when the liars saw their only option, but the option was there in 1971 in Saul Alinsky’s Rule for Radicals.

    Shifting blame works very well with media help. Examples:

    1. President Trump is a traitor because Democrats colluded with the Soviets throughout the Cold War.

    2. President Trump is a liar because the Party of Liars always tell the truth.





    When Harry cheated on Sally he accused Sally of cheating. What? It is called projection. Psychological projection is a “psychological defense mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities by denying their existence in themselves and attributing them to others.” Projection is a method of blame shifting - Harry blamed Sally for what Harry did.

    When Harry accuses Sally it is incumbent upon Sally to defend herself from the bogus charges. This cunning maneuver shifts the focus from Harry to Sally which is the underlying strategic objective of the false allegations. So, while Sally is busy defending herself Harry’s guilt goes unchallenged and he can continue to cheat. The best defense is an offense.

    When Harry Cheated on Sally
    By Linda Goudsmit
    December 30, 2018

    https://canadafreepress.com/article/...eated-on-sally

    Incidentally, Governor Moonbeam is no slouch when it comes to telling whoppers:

    WASHINGTON — California Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown warned that America and the rest of the world are falling behind in the fight against climate change and likened the challenge to fighting the Nazis in World War II.

    Dec. 30, 2018 / 9:08 AM EST
    By Ben Kamisar

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/mee...ld-war-n952446

    Finally, the world needs a better lie detector or fewer liars. Scientists have yet to invent a lie detector strong enough to survive the lies Hillary Clinton tells.





    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    What a lot of crap.. Is the Canadian freepress usually so asinine?
    He who is the author of a war lets loose the whole contagion of hell and opens a vein that bleeds a nation to death. Thomas Paine

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to kudzu For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (12-31-2018)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    57,096
    Thanks
    25,210
    Thanked 20,647 Times in 16,577 Posts
    Groans
    129
    Groaned 1,435 Times in 1,357 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    What a lot of crap.. Is the Canadian freepress usually so asinine?
    What's not accurate in the article?

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TOP For This Post:

    Flanders (12-31-2018), MAGA MAN (01-01-2019), Rune (12-31-2018)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    Is the Canadian freepress usually so asinine?

    To Kudzu: Not nearly as often as you:

    asinine (adjective)

    1. Utterly stupid or silly: asinine behavior.

    2. Of, relating to, or resembling an ass.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Flanders For This Post:

    MAGA MAN (01-01-2019)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    What's not accurate in the article?
    The Democrat Party became the Party of women in 1920. (19th Amendment)

    The Democrat Party became the party of Socialists/Communists in the 1930s.

    The Democrat Party became the party of traitors in 1945. (The United Nations)

    You really want to go backwards?
    He who is the author of a war lets loose the whole contagion of hell and opens a vein that bleeds a nation to death. Thomas Paine

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    57,096
    Thanks
    25,210
    Thanked 20,647 Times in 16,577 Posts
    Groans
    129
    Groaned 1,435 Times in 1,357 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    The Democrat Party became the Party of women in 1920. (19th Amendment)

    The Democrat Party became the party of Socialists/Communists in the 1930s.

    The Democrat Party became the party of traitors in 1945. (The United Nations)

    You really want to go backwards?
    What's not accurate? Too late to worry about the "backward slide" isn't it? ten years too late...*‘

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TOP For This Post:

    Flanders (12-31-2018), Rune (12-31-2018)

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,291
    Thanks
    13,303
    Thanked 40,970 Times in 32,285 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    What a lot of crap.. Is the Canadian freepress usually so asinine?


    no kidding.......where on earth did he come up with this one......

    The Democrat Party became the party of black Americans with the Civil Rights Movement. (1950s & ‘60s)
    the demmycrats voted against Civil RIghts in the 50s and 60s.........it was after it collapsed from racism leaving a power vacuum in the South that blacks took over the local Democrat Party there........

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,291
    Thanks
    13,303
    Thanked 40,970 Times in 32,285 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    What's not accurate? Too late to worry about the "backward slide" isn't it? ten years too late...*‘
    The Democrat Party became the Party of women in 1920. (19th Amendment)
    First state to allow women to vote, Wyoming
    First state to elect a woman as governor, Wyoming
    Senator who submitted the proposed 19th Amendment to Congress......U.S. Representative James R. Mann, a Republican from Illinois and chairman of the Suffrage Committee
    States who opposed the 19th Amendment......Southern Democrat states
    Within six days of the ratification cycle, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin each ratified the amendment. Kansas, New York and Ohio followed on June 16, 1919. By March of the following year, a total of 35 states had approved the amendment, one state shy of the two-thirds required for ratification.


    Southern states were adamantly opposed to the amendment, however, and seven of them—Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, South Carolina and Virginia—had already rejected it before Tennessee’s vote on August 18, 1920. It was up to Tennessee to tip the scale for woman suffrage.
    Who made the final vote in Tennessee?....
    The outlook appeared bleak, given the outcomes in other Southern states and given the position of Tennessee’s state legislators in their 48-48 tie. The state’s decision came down to 23-year-old Representative Harry T. Burn, a Republican from McMinn County, to cast the deciding vote.
    the demmycrats are always on the wrong side......

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    TOP (12-31-2018)

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Didn't DEMOCRATS become the party of treason in 1861?

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Didn't DEMOCRATS become the party of treason in 1861?
    To Legion: I could start the road to treason in the late 19th century with early American Socialists, but I usually start with the League of Nations chiseled in stone by membership in the United Nations in 1945.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To Legion: I could start the road to treason in the late 19th century with early American Socialists, but I usually start with the League of Nations chiseled in stone by membership in the United Nations in 1945.
    To Flanders: In 1861, DEMOCRATS attacked the USA in order to preserve slavery, didn't they?

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    To Flanders: In 1861, DEMOCRATS attacked the USA in order to preserve slavery, didn't they?
    To Legion: I cannot accept your premise. The South did not commit treason, nor did Lincoln when he gave the country a war between the states rather than allow Confederate States to exercise their constitutional Right to secede.

    Lincoln is the last person anybody should invoke trying to justify the Civil War with the slavery argument. Everything Lincoln did and said set this country on the road to federal government control.

    Instead of civil war, Lincoln could have, and should have, worked within the Constitution if he felt so strongly about preserving the Union. Naturally, the Civil War would have been unnecessary had the South surrendered their Rights instead of defending them.

    The fact is that Lincoln saw the Constitution impeding his will.


    Americans celebrate Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, but H.L. Mencken correctly evaluated the speech, "It is poetry not logic; beauty, not sense." Lincoln said that the soldiers sacrificed their lives "to the cause of self-determination -- government of the people, by the people, for the people should not perish from the earth."

    Mencken says: "It is difficult to imagine anything more untrue. The Union soldiers in the battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of people to govern themselves."


    The Real Lincoln
    Walter E. Williams | Mar 27, 2002

    http://townhall.com/columnists/walte...e_real_lincoln

    Mencken specifically objected to this:

    THAT FROM THESE HONORED DEAD WE TAKE INCREASED DEVOTION TO THAT CAUSE FOR WHICH THEY GAVE THE LAST FULL MEASURE OF DEVOTION~THAT WE HERE HIGHLY RESOLVE THAT THESE DEAD SHALL NOT HAVE DIED IN VAIN~THAT THIS NATION UNDER GOD SHALL HAVE A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM~AND THAT GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE SHALL NOT PERISH FROM THE EARTH

    NOTE: Lincoln stole a constitutional Right from the South in addition to providing a blueprint for the theft of stealing states’ Rights from every state.

    Nobody can make the case that America today is governed by, of, and for the people. Nobody can convince me that AMERICANS demanded open-borders, sanctuary cities, loss of their sovereignty, and everything else the federal government imposes on them. Everything the federal government does came from Lincoln’s blueprint. The result has been government by, of, and for the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) and illegal aliens.

    Lincoln used his gift of gab to impose his personal belief on the country; i.e., holding the Union together. Almost every president after Lincoln behaved as though their personal moral code overrides the Constitution. The recent spiritual leader, Obama, took Lincoln sacrificing the Constitution for his personal moral certainty far beyond what all of the other dirty little moralists did to the country.

    Bottom line: Lincoln can be blamed for the evils of today’s big government because he took the first step towards totalitarian government. Put it in perspective by examining all the harm that flowed from holding the Union together.

    It is fair to add black race hustlers to Lincoln’s list of evils. You can be sure that black race hustlers in Africa will demand reparations if big mouth American hustlers are paid off:


    WASHINGTON – Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) told PJM that the federal government [Lincoln’s federal government] should conduct a study of reparations for descendants of slaves to be able to determine the best way to “repair some of the damage" that slavery has caused to the African-American community.

    Congresswoman Hopes Reparations Bill is Path to ‘Repair Some of the Damage’ Caused by Slavery
    By Nicholas Ballasy
    December 30, 2018

    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politic...ed-by-slavery/
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,852
    Thanks
    41,531
    Thanked 10,835 Times in 8,249 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To Legion: I cannot accept your premise. The South did not commit treason, nor did Lincoln when he gave the country a war between the states rather than allow Confederate States to exercise their constitutional Right to secede.

    Lincoln is the last person anybody should invoke trying to justify the Civil War with the slavery argument. Everything Lincoln did and said set this country on the road to federal government control.

    Instead of civil war, Lincoln could have, and should have, worked within the Constitution if he felt so strongly about preserving the Union. Naturally, the Civil War would have been unnecessary had the South surrendered their Rights instead of defending them.

    The fact is that Lincoln saw the Constitution impeding his will.


    Americans celebrate Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, but H.L. Mencken correctly evaluated the speech, "It is poetry not logic; beauty, not sense." Lincoln said that the soldiers sacrificed their lives "to the cause of self-determination -- government of the people, by the people, for the people should not perish from the earth."

    Mencken says: "It is difficult to imagine anything more untrue. The Union soldiers in the battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of people to govern themselves."


    The Real Lincoln
    Walter E. Williams | Mar 27, 2002

    http://townhall.com/columnists/walte...e_real_lincoln

    Mencken specifically objected to this:

    THAT FROM THESE HONORED DEAD WE TAKE INCREASED DEVOTION TO THAT CAUSE FOR WHICH THEY GAVE THE LAST FULL MEASURE OF DEVOTION~THAT WE HERE HIGHLY RESOLVE THAT THESE DEAD SHALL NOT HAVE DIED IN VAIN~THAT THIS NATION UNDER GOD SHALL HAVE A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM~AND THAT GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE SHALL NOT PERISH FROM THE EARTH

    NOTE: Lincoln stole a constitutional Right from the South in addition to providing a blueprint for the theft of stealing states’ Rights from every state.

    Nobody can make the case that America today is governed by, of, and for the people. Nobody can convince me that AMERICANS demanded open-borders, sanctuary cities, loss of their sovereignty, and everything else the federal government imposes on them. Everything the federal government does came from Lincoln’s blueprint. The result has been government by, of, and for the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) and illegal aliens.

    Lincoln used his gift of gab to impose his personal belief on the country; i.e., holding the Union together. Almost every president after Lincoln behaved as though their personal moral code overrides the Constitution. The recent spiritual leader, Obama, took Lincoln sacrificing the Constitution for his personal moral certainty far beyond what all of the other dirty little moralists did to the country.

    Bottom line: Lincoln can be blamed for the evils of today’s big government because he took the first step towards totalitarian government. Put it in perspective by examining all the harm that flowed from holding the Union together.

    It is fair to add black race hustlers to Lincoln’s list of evils. You can be sure that black race hustlers in Africa will demand reparations if big mouth American hustlers are paid off:


    WASHINGTON – Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) told PJM that the federal government [Lincoln’s federal government] should conduct a study of reparations for descendants of slaves to be able to determine the best way to “repair some of the damage" that slavery has caused to the African-American community.

    Congresswoman Hopes Reparations Bill is Path to ‘Repair Some of the Damage’ Caused by Slavery
    By Nicholas Ballasy
    December 30, 2018

    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politic...ed-by-slavery/
    What a colossal load of shit.
    You are incorrect in every single claim.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  19. The Following User Groans At Rune For This Awful Post:

    Flanders (12-31-2018)

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (01-01-2019)

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    The Democrat Party became the party of environmental parasites after the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991. (http://canadafreepress.com/article/p...m-the-pastures )
    Sunday’s episode of “Meet the Press” with Chuck Todd featured an hourlong panel with lawmakers and scientists about the consequences of climate change. But at the start, Mr. Todd said his show is “not going to give time to climate deniers” and went on to inaccurately characterize the nature of the climate debate.

    “Just as important as what we are going to do is what we’re not going to do,” he said. “We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period.”

    “We’re not going to give time to climate deniers,” Mr. Todd added. “The science is settled even if political opinion is not.”

    NBC News host says no air time for climate 'deniers' on "Meet the Press': 'Science is settled'
    By Victor Morton
    Sunday, December 30, 2018

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ed-meet-press/

    Todd got the memo from Al Gore. Christopher Monckton is the guy Al Gore refused to debate the environmental crapola Gore pushes to this day.



    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  22. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    In all the years I posted hundreds of messages about the U.N. and its plan to claim ownership of the atmosphere and the oceans. Christopher Monckton’s summery of the United Nations’ Rio+20 Summit is so concise and comprehensive I feel like I never said a word or posted a message. Monckton is so good TV talking heads burdened by time constraints can learn how it’s done. Please pay extra attention to the parts about global government:



    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. no one wants to take your guns liars
    By evince in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 338
    Last Post: 02-06-2018, 06:40 PM
  2. Replies: 160
    Last Post: 12-29-2016, 03:36 PM
  3. Liars!
    By stoned in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-27-2016, 02:57 PM
  4. Best Liars?
    By Damocles in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-05-2008, 10:56 PM
  5. Professional Liars
    By Cancel7 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-21-2007, 09:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •