I have always felt that way...and have NEVER indicated otherwise.
What are you talking about?
Not necessarily.Would you say it would be way worse than Watergate if that were the case with the Mullet appointment?
I am not even sure what you mean by "Watergate."
There are several factors involved there.
Earl (01-06-2019)
I doubt that.
There was no debate going on that I know of. "Debate" such as it is, takes place in a special place here in JPP. This is not that place.Debate ended with the "Hitler" post.
Do you?I understand why you are on the "ignore" list of many posters.
Okay.
"Unattractiveness" is in the eyes of the beholder.Intentional obtuseness is unattractive.
So...fuck you and that smarmy bullshit you are trying to peddle.
My what?BSEE from Vanderbilt with minors in Eng. Lit. and World History. Yours?
I am an 82 year old man...who has had his thoughts and comments published in major publications like the New York Times (op ed sized piece disagreeing with A. M. Rosenthal) and Newsweek Magazine (a full page MY TURN). I've also had op ed pieces published in many of the nation's top newspapers.
I have seen no discussion from you other than immature playground insults. Are you a child?
So...I truly do not give a fuck what you think or have seen, Asshole.
Anything else I can help you with?
Earl (01-06-2019)
Yes...what do you mean by Watergate?
There are several elements...and crimes...associated with what people refer to as "Watergate."
In any case...this hyperbolic hypothetical of yours sucks. Big time!
Ahhh...so your opinion is that your hypothetical is way, way worse than "Watergate"...whatever you mean by that.
It would be way, way worse, Frankie.
Okay. Thanks for sharing that.
What do you mean by "Watergate?"Watergate wasn’t a soft coup.
And what is a "soft coup?"
Earl (01-06-2019)
Earl (01-06-2019)
I’m not in the mood to parse words, Frankie lol.
The facts are sufficient to support probable cause. Put it this way: if they had probable cause to investigate Trump colluding with the Russians, then there’s *easily* a sufficient basis to establish probable cause that Russian collusion was a ruse, and a pretext, used to open an investigative crime search on Trump.
Aka a Witch Hunt.
That’s some serious shit, Frankie. And I think you know it is.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Earl (01-06-2019)
Earl (01-06-2019)
No problem, Darth. You seldom do a decent job of it anyway.
If you want to assume the investigation is a ruse...and that the antecedents were pretext...fine with me. I prefer the opinions of the FBI, the CIA, the courts, and the DoJ.The facts are sufficient to support probable cause. Put it this way: if they had probable cause to investigate Trump colluding with the Russians, then there’s *easily* a sufficient basis to establish probable cause that Russian collusion was a ruse, and a pretext, used to open an investigative crime search on Trump.
As I said, I prefer the opinions of the FBI, the CIA, the courts, and the DoJ.Aka a Witch Hunt.
So far, I think everything has been done legitimately and legally.That’s some serious shit, Frankie. And I think you know it is.
You seem to be fearing the worst from the Mueller investigation...so you are doing your best to make it seem illegitimate.
Sorry you are being fearful.
Earl (01-06-2019)
christiefan915 (01-06-2019), rjhenn (01-13-2019)
I have noted that liberals are a melancholy group. Always complaining and angry about something. Perhaps a bit of Thoreau's "Walden" ("simplify, simplify, simplify") would soothe the savage beast or Beethoven.
Bookmarks