Originally Posted by
Frank Apisa
Thanks, Darth. I'm hoping I find the swing I can use regularly on the course this year. It would be a big improvement.
Once again...your "logic" is not logical...on a couple of levels.
One...one is not forced to surmise it's because they didn't have anything to charge him with.
Two...one is not forced to surmise the claims in the dossier are worthless.
You cannot see the future...and charges may still be brought...or there may be good and compelling reasons for not charging Page despite evidence that could lead to charges.
WE DO NOT YET KNOW.
Three...one is not forced to surmise that Page was illegally spied on by the IC...who actually did not spy on him. The FBI surveilled him. ALL of it was legal. YOUR opinion that it was not legal does not trump (!) the opinions of the FBI, the DoJ, and the FISA court judges...that it was.
I AM curious about it...but strange as this may sound to you, I actually give more weight to the opinions of the FBI, the DoJ, and the FISA court judges than yours on the matter.
I keep my mind open enough to want to see how this plays out. The fat lady has not yet sung.
YOU are the one blinded, Darth. Your absurd loyalty to this disgusting abomination in the White House IS BLINDING YOU.
Always the word-gamer, Frankie lol.
Ok, the *most plausible* explanation *given the facts at hand* for the non-charge of Carter Page is that he committed no crime and that, contrary to the claims in the Dossier, he was not a Russian agent. If you want to believe otherwise, then you have to explain why Mullet is wasting time with Page instead of charging him and then squeezing him to get to Trump.
And let’s the drop the pretense that this is anything other than a ploy to get to Trump. Nobody cares about Carter Page.
Will you accept the most plausible explanation or continue to make lame excuses instead?
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Bookmarks