Democrats Are Mounting A Cavalry Charge

[Flanders]

I get the feeling that Joe Biden thinks the Chicago sewer rat owes him the nomination:

Vanity Fair said, “Obamaworld insiders describe the former vice president as upset” with Obama’s attention to other Democrat contenders for 2020.

Vanity Fair: Joe Biden Upset by Obama’s Attention to Beto O’Rourke
by NATE CHURCH
26 Dec 2018

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-beto-orourke/

Regardless of the eventual nominee Democrat Party operators will not make the same mistake they made with Hillary. The next time out they will steal everything that is not nailed down. Every Democrat saddling up for a cavalry charge knows the candidate has a better than even chance of stealing the general election —— more so if they can keep the borders open coupled with ballot harvesting in a few key states:

What Is ‘Ballot Harvesting,’ And How Did California Dems Use It To Nuke The GOP?
Scott Morefield
5:14 PM 12/01/2018

https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/01/b...rnia-dems-gop/

No political party ever learned more from a defeat than they learned from Hillary Clinton’s downfall. No candidate in history had more money, more political influence, more media support, and more bureaucratic corruption in her corner than did Hillary.

Finally, Democrats have two years to set up the machinery so millions of illegal aliens and LEGAL U.N. refugees can vote for the welfare state.

XXXXX

It is no wonder that Hillary Clinton blamed her loss on the Electoral Collage. No matter the next time. Democrats will do better in 2020 when they spread three or four million more illegal voters around in the states they need to steal the Electoral College, too.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...09#post2759409

Bottom line: Rigging elections will always take place, but 2020 could be the last chance Democrats have to steal another one —— primarily because everything they stand for is one flush away from their shit going down the toilet forever.

p.s. Republican wannabes came out of the bushes in 2016 because they correctly saw Hillary Clinton, or Bernie Sanders, as pushovers. Conversely, Democrat wannabes know that beating Trump is not going to be easy. That is why Democrats are convinced larceny will put them in White House even if conservatives come out for Trump.

[Irish Exit]

Doesn't matter but why would Obama pay attention to a guy with a foot in the grave to run 2 years from now? Beto needs to move to another state and run for Senate there to get some experience.

[Mason Michaels]

Doesn't matter but why would Obama pay attention to a guy with a foot in the grave to run 2 years from now? Beto needs to move to another state and run for Senate there to get some experience.

Fuck that!Beto just needs to become a reality show host!
Or do DWTS,or Survivor

[Irish Exit]

Fuck that!Beto just needs to become a reality show host!
Or do DWTS,or Survivor

He is too milquetoast for reality TV.

[Mason Michaels]

He is too milquetoast for reality TV.

He doesn't have bone spurs

[Irish Exit]

He doesn't have bone spurs

He also doesn't have a path forward politically living in Texas.

[Mason Michaels]

He also doesn't have a path forward politically living in Texas.

You're a real downer

[Irish Exit]

You're a real downer

Why? The two aren't mutually exclusive. He could be in the Carpet Bagger Tribe on Survivor.

[Flanders]

HALF a league, half a league,
Half a league onward,
All in the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred.
'Forward, the Light Brigade!
Charge for the guns!' he said:
Into the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred.

Here comes the cavalry dreaming of Balaclava. Note that Hillary Clinton’s picture is missing for now:

[kudzu]

Doesn't matter but why would Obama pay attention to a guy with a foot in the grave to run 2 years from now? Beto needs to move to another state and run for Senate there to get some experience.

I think Biden is just too old to run... He's 76.

[Flanders]

I think Biden is just too old to run... He's 76.

To kudzu: Am I getting a whiff of age discrimination coming from a lib? Be careful. It might blow Hillary’s way:

At the bottom of the list was twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, [age 71] who excited only 15 percent of the voters polled, compared to 70 percent who said she should sit this one out.

Democrats desperate for 'someone new' in 2020: poll
By Jessica Chasmar
Thursday, December 27, 2018

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...20-over-biden/

No political party ever learned more from a defeat than they learned from Hillary Clinton’s downfall. No candidate in history had more money, more political influence, more media support, and more bureaucratic corruption in her corner than did Hillary.

Do not count Hillary Clinton out just yet.

The global government crowd has so much time and money invested in the Clinton dream of President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton saving the world together they have no choice but to send good money after bad.

One look at the cavalry charge tells me that Hillary’s bid for the White House is alive and well. Dreams die hard. President Hillary Clinton and U.N. Secretary General Bill Clinton ruling the world together is more marketable than the stuff the other Democrats are selling. In short: The Clinton dream did not end in November 2016 as I originally thought.

Before the Clinton dream makes anyone puke remember that Obama also sent his résumé to the New World Order crowd.

Think about this for a while. Secretary General B. Hussein Obama can do more to keep our borders open for asylum-seekers than he did when he was president. Keeping the border open for United Nations economic refugees keeps it open for illegal aliens.

Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General.

There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it's true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama's oddities -- including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up.

But first -- why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?

1. Obama's unbounded ego.

In three and a half years, Obama will be out of a job. He is 50 now and wants to soar to greater heights, because that's what matters more than anything else in his life.

What's better to Obama's Napoleonic self than being U.N. Sec Gen? He is a man who wants to be worshiped by the world, and the path to that goal is clear. It is also an opportunity to carry out his internationalist and pro-Muslim convictions.

Personalities like his need the excitement of taking big risks for big gains. Obama's slogan "the audacity of hope" comes from Napoleon's general, who described his war strategy as "Audacity, audacity, always audacity!" Alinsky's Rules advise: "Always act outside of the experience of the enemy." It now looks like Obama has never won a single clean election, because he has always violated the rules. He always gambles, and as long as his opponents play by the rules, he wins.

Mitt Romney is a good and decent man, and IRS intimidation of political enemies is just not his way. Knowing that, the Obama campaign violated the rules deliberately, cynically, and with malice aforethought. It worked.

2. Obama's internationalist ideology.

The Communist anthem is The Internationale. When Obama gave his big speech in Berlin even before the first inauguration, his first words were "Citizens of the world!" That was meant as Marxist symbolism. All the leftists in the world cheered themselves hoarse.

Berlin was Marx's city, the capital of the Prussian Empire that was the model for the Communist Worker's Paradise, to be guided by the new Prussian Junkers, the Communist Party. "Citizens of the world!" was an echo of "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!"

The American media didn't bother to tell us that, but they knew. They knew.

Obama constantly pulls stunts with obvious Marxist overtones. His inner circle laughs at his audacity, and he likes to clown it up for Valerie Jarrett, Michelle, Ayers, and Axelrod.

Obama is a trickster, power-hungry, insatiable, and sociopathic. His enemy is us, or what Jeremiah Wright would call "middleclassness," the values that most of us try to live by.

As a European Socialist, Obama does not believe in the U.S. Constitution. His appointees have no conscience about violating the Constitution, as is obvious from today's news about fundamental IRS violations, fundamental invasion of news reporters' privileges under the First Amendment, and fundamental violations of the ethics of combat commanders -- leaving soldiers under fire to the tender mercies of a vicious enemy.

Obama is audacity man -- violating decent values is his specialty. Bill and Hillary found that out when he played the race card against them at the 2008 Democratic Convention. Democrats always play the race card, but never against each other. In 2008, Obama violated that rule, and he got away with it.

3. Butt-kissing tyrants.

If Obama wants to run for U.N. SecGen after 2016, he needs two things: a U.S. nomination by a Democratic president and a majority vote in the U.N. General Assembly.

Let's say Hillary gets elected in 2016, as Democrats now are hoping. She nominates Obama to be U.N. SecGen, to rousing cheers from the New York Times and Washington Post, the U.K. Guardian, and Workers' World.

Now Obama needs a majority of U.N. General Assembly votes.

By butt-kissing every throwback tyrant in sight, Obama is buying U.N. votes for himself. Obama's public bows to throwbacks like Saudi's King Abdullah and the emperor of Japan are not just another weird thing about this guy. They are strategic, with the purpose of lining up support for the future.

There are 57 Muslim states. (Remember Obama's slip of the tongue when he talked about "all 57 states"? He wasn't thinking about Heinz 57 flavors. He was thinking about Muslim states.)

Europe is the home of imperialist socialism. The European Union is the successor to the Soviet Union, run by an appointed political machine just like the USSR. Obama is a EuroSoc, and he will get enthusiastic support from there.

South America will vote for him, because he is actively supporting leftist regimes below the border. Obama's recent trip to Mexico was full of bowing and scraping to Mexico's tender feelings about losing Texas and California in the 19th century. Blowing open the border is just another favor Obama is doing for Latin America.

If you combine his unbounded ego with his penchant for audacious trickery, it becomes clear why Obama would want to be U.N. Secretary General. To U.N.-worshipers, the SecGen is the basis for a world presidency. Even if it remains a weak position, it could be a wonderful bully pulpit for Obama's endless speech habit. It would crown Obama's life achievements and allow him to crow over the United States with its old-fashioned constitution designed to limit the powers of such as The Trickster.

President Obama could have used the Benghazi attack on 9/11 last year to look like the commander in chief, a role he loves to play. He could have allowed Air Force jets to strafe and bomb the gaggle of Ansar al Shari'a gunmen who overran the compound and killed what are now admitted to be six Americans, including Ambassador Stevens.

This might have been Obama's Heroic Capture of bin Laden, part 2.

When Obama skips a chance to boast and strut on the stage just before an election, we have to wonder why. He is not usually shy about putting himself in the limelight.

Michael Barone and Charles Krauthammer believe that Benghazi was covered up because Obama and Hillary were afraid to admit that al-Qaeda wasn't dead -- that AQ is very much alive, and dangerous as a snake.

On 9/11 last year, there were not one, but two simultaneous assaults on American targets: the Cairo Embassy and the Benghazi compound. The front pages that day showed the black AQ flag flying over a burned part of the U.S. Embassy. Double-simultaneous assaults are an al-Qaeda signature, as we know from 9/11/01, when the Pentagon was assaulted simultaneously with the Twin Towers. Double-bomb attacks spell AL-QAEDA.

Everybody in the Muslim world understood that on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11/01, AQ was telling the world it could strike us at any place and time. Bin Laden may be dead, but jihad keeps marchin' on.

Benghazi was a secret CIA operation to smuggle arms from Libya to the "Free Syrian Army," consisting of radical Islamists. Stevens was at the arms compound in Benghazi to direct a large arms shipment. He was the Libya expert who helped to overthrow Gaddafi in the first place. Now he was shipping Gaddafi's armaments to overthrow Bashir Assad in Syria.

The United States was apparently acting in collusion with radical Muslim factions, probably including al-Qaeda in the Maghreb (the Mediterranean coast of North Africa). We know that Stevens even hired another jihadist faction to guard the CIA compound. Early Benghazi reports showed that they magically disappeared on the day of the attack, as did the Libyan police. Our loyal Libyan allies.

Obama was therefore directly colluding with al-Qaeda, the enemy that destroyed the Twin Towers on 9/11/01. AQ is a big part of the "Free" Syrian Army that is trying to destroy Assad, because Assad is a Shi'ite who runs a secular Baathist regime. One of our friendly radical Islamist groups, Ansar al Shari'a, simply decided to send a bloody message to America that day by killing Stevens and burning the annex.

The strategic purpose of the "Free Syrian Army" is to cut the Shi'ite Crescent running from Iran through Syria to Lebanon. We are involved in a proxy war between Iran and the Sunni Arabs. We are now supporting the Sunni maniacs against Iran's maniacs. That is what Benghazi was about.

One can make a case for pitting Sunnis against Shi'ites. But Obama knows perfectly well that after Assad, Syria will be run by another set of murderous fanatics.

Collusion with radical Muslims is standard in this administration. That is completely, profoundly cynical, or it is simply aiding the enemy.

There are many reasons for that collusion, but protecting the United States is not one of them. The policy of appeasement and treachery protects radical Islam and endangers the West.

However, if Obama wants to be SecGen of the United Nations in four years, there is an extra reason to buy votes in the Middle East.

None of this should ever become public knowledge, as far as Obama and Hillary are concerned. Benghazi therefore had to be covered up at any price.

With Obama, personal ambition and political moves always go together.

Conservatives, beware.

May 25, 2013
Benghazi and Obama's Ambition to Be U.N. SecGen
By James Lewis

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...un_secgen.html

[Legion]

Democrats Are Mounting A Cavalry Charge

DEMOCRATS will mount almost anything. Monica Lewinsky, the Hildebeast...

[Flanders]

Think about this for a while. Secretary General B. Hussein Obama can do more to keep our borders open for asylum-seekers than he did when he was president. Keeping the border open for United Nations economic refugees keeps it open for illegal aliens.

President Trump cannot close the border fast enough with or without a wall:

Nutso Nancy and Upchuck Schumer see a opportunity to buy amnesty (citizenship) for illegal aliens. It will start with amnesty for DACA. Democrats are counting on amnesty for DACA giving the Supreme Court the foundation they need to grant citizenship to all of the other illegal aliens.

Releasing illegal aliens on American soil instead of deporting them immediately creates all of the tragedies media mouths are blaming on conservatives. This country’s immigration policy gives crores of tax dollars to religious charities and to hell with the First Amendment.

Do-gooder freaks like this guy want everybody else to pay for their moral worldview. It never occurs to charity hustlers to take care of just one family out of their own pockets instead of converting the world to Christianity’s bullshit:

Eli Fernandez, a volunteer for Catholic Charities, speaks to [ILLEGAL] immigrants, most seeking political asylum, who were released from U.S. government detention on November 3, 2018 in McAllen, Texas. John Moore/Getty Images

Illegal aliens would not be dropped off at bus stops if they stay in their homelands.

Trump administration to release hundreds of immigrant families from detention
But with border nonprofits already stretched to capacity, many families will probably end up dropped off en masse at bus stations.
By Dara Linddara
Updated Dec 27, 2018, 4:38pm EST

https://www.vox.com/2018/12/27/18157...ren-deaths-ice

NOTE: Roman Catholic parasites are not the only organized religion’s charity hustlers getting tax dollars:

Things NGOs do for the sake of religion, in the name of religion
Sanjana
15 June 2016

https://causebecause.com/things-ngos...-religion/4508

Every dollar charity hustlers take in is a TAX DEDUCTION. Adding insult to injury, EVERY charity dollar sent abroad is a tax deduction for somebody while the American people do not benefit in any way.

This country was not built by parasites. It was built by a free people working for themselves and their loved ones. Either you believe in the Constitution, or you believe in the tax collector’s morality:

In 1794, when Congress appropriated $15,000 for relief of French refugees who fled from insurrection in San Domingo to Baltimore and Philadelphia, James Madison stood on the floor of the House to object saying, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." James Madison, 4 Annals of congress 179 (1794)

A wise and frugal government … shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government. Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801

I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious. Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Ludlow, September 6, 1824

With respect to the two words ‘general welfare,’ I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. James Madison

If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions. James Madison, “Letter to Edmund Pendleton,”

Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own. According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property. James Madison

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer. Benjamin Franklin

Our tenet ever was that Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated, and that, as it was never meant that they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action; consequently, that the specification of powers is a limitation of the purposes for which they may raise money. Thomas Jefferson letter to Albert Gallatin, 1817

I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for public charity. [To approve the measure] would be contrary to the letter and spirit of the Constitution and subversive to the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded. President Franklin Pierce's 1854 veto of a measure to help the mentally ill.

Finally, Democrats despise the men for the freedoms that made this country, while they love parasites and 7 lawyers who slaughtered 60 million infants and still counting.

[domer76]

I think Biden is just too old to run... He's 76.

He's in a lot better shape than Trump.

[Flanders]

Holy crap! A blond Indian is leading the charge against the other Democrats: