Reply With Quoteif you really said that I need to add you to my ignore list.......As I said many times “Nazi Germany’s occupation was the last good thing to happen in the Netherlands.”
Verified User
Euthanasia Is Camped On The Northern Border
The Netherlands leads the world in Socialist parasites. There is no better example of Socialist morality at work than those in Holland. The Dutch rejected Nazi euthanasia, but now Dutch Communists lead the world in peacetime euthanasia. The Netherlands has long been the proving ground for worldwide Socialism’s Culture of Death. As I said many times “Nazi Germany’s occupation was the last good thing to happen in the Netherlands.” Sad to say Holland’s morality is camping on our border:
Following its 2019 elections, Canada is expected to approve euthanasia for sick children, joining the Netherlands and Belgium as the only nations in the world affirmatively sanctioning such practices.
The Council of Canadian Academies, a government advisory board has studied the expansion of euthanasia to include making it available for children, those with mental illness and so-called “advance requests” by those who wish to set in motion assisted suicide should they become incompetent to make the decision later.
Whereas assisted suicide is legal in some states in the U.S., no statistics are kept on the number of cases.
In Canada, however, it’s a booming business with thousands put to death by doctors and nurse practitioners since it was legalized nationwide in 2015. Clinics run TV commercials for euthanasia.
Nearly 2,000 were killed in 2017 alone in Canada, almost all by lethal injection.
Coming soon: Legal child euthanasia
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 12/23/2018 @ 5:28 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/coming-s...ld-euthanasia/
The phrase “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.” is often attributed to Associate Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892 - 1954), yet liberals are hellbent on bringing about America’s self-destruction. (Jackson took a leave of absence from the Supreme Court in order to act as the CHIEF PROSECUTOR in the best-known of the International Military Tribunals held in Nuremberg.)
There is nothing immoral in punishing those responsible for war crimes, but I always thought that they should be tried and punished by the victims in the country where the crimes took place —— not by an international body of any kind.
Socialist intellectuals have been working overtime establishing International law since the second half of the 19th century. The 1961 movie Justice at Nuremberg was the first major propaganda attempt to sell it to the masses. J-at-N was shown on television’s Playhouse 90 before it was made into a theatrical movie. After listening to the dialogue it is hard to miss liberalism’s moral garbage.
The movie’s attack on love of country is even more offensive than is glorifying non-existent International law. That is not to say I put in with the kind of patriotism the Nazis practiced. The not-so-subliminal message that I object to is that patriotism itself was portrayed as the villain; Nazi judges went along out of their love for Germany.
Hitler came to power on false patriotism (nationalism). Obama came to power by paying scant lip service to his love of this country. Frankly, he did not need patriotism as a stepping stone to the White House. Had he needed it he would have used it. Luckily for Obama, and with a lot of help from the media, he avoided a patriotism pissing contest with his opponent John McCain.
Institutional sadism first preaches, then implements, the horrors that should be understood. Infanticide, euthanasia, population controls, death panels, forced sterilization, and doctor-assisted suicides, represent the very essence of institutional brutality. Every progressive ideal has been gaining acceptance while wearing a cloak of compassion.
NOTE: Islam added female mutilation to the list of institutional brutality in non-Muslim countries.
Incidentally, the high cost of keeping a comatose patient on life support is one of the arguments used to end life. The very people who make that argument never complain about the tremendous cost of feeding wealthy tax dollar parasites. In short: The number of individuals requiring life support is miniscule compared to the number of millionaire Democrat parasites in the federal government.
I noticed that the euthanasia lobby —— which includes the mainstream media —— list brain dead as a success. See this thread for more about brain dead:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...04#post2776904
This is one aspect of brain dead that especially troubles me. There is an assumption that thoughts, emotions, feelings, etc., originate in the brain. Hence, brain dead sounds logical. I have never been convinced that that is the case. When you cut your finger an impulse is sent to the brain telling you to feel the pain in your finger. The paralyzing fear a person feels as their car skids towards an oncoming truck begins in the pit of their stomach, it does not originate in the brain.
Who can deny that thoughts are only processed by the brain originating elsewhere as in pain or fear? The brain is a processor and does not feel pain. As far as I know, there was no damage elsewhere sending signals to Terri’s brain telling her to feel pain. There was no evidence that she was feeling pain. Even if it can be shown beyond a doubt that she was in pain the answer is painkillers not euthanasia.
Those who killed Terri said that she was not in pain —— never admitting that starvation causes pain even if the brain was not functioning well enough to activate a defense mechanism.
Please do not compare the court-ordered murder of an innocent woman to the execution of a criminal after decades of tax dollar funded appeals. In any event, Terri Schiavo never hurt anyone, but she was killed without her consent anyway.
One of the arguments for killing Terri cited her Right to abstain from receiving artificial life support. The word abstain was actually used. Of all of the perverse talking points liberals cite to justify killing with kindness the abstain claim is the worst; more so since no one knew what Terri wanted. The government does not allow Americans to abstain from anything these days. Obviously, an exception was made to accommodate the Grim Reaper in Terri’s Right to abstain from being murdered.
To no one’s surprise the ACLU came down on the side of killing Terri Schiavo. The ACLU is a charter member in the Culture of Death Club, while at the same time the ACLU fights the death penalty at every turn. Do not let the Culture of Death crowd’s push to abolish the death penalty fool you. Liberals are outraged by the death penalty because they fear the day they might find themselves strapped to a gurney.
NOTE: The U.N.’s phony-ass International Court of Justice does not allow a death penalty. The reason is simple. Politicians and the rich are the only people who get a trial in The Hague, Netherlands.
Parenthetically, a few years ago anti-death penalty liberals got the High Court to look into the method of lethal injections used by the states. They said that execution by lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. At the time I resolved the constitutional issue real fast. I said the Nifty Nine should order states to order those officials who carry out a death sentence to use the same methods used by Jack “The Dripper” Kervokian (1928 - 2011) and the assisted-suicide crowd.
Democrats kill everything that walks on two feet except convicted murderers anyway. So if those states with the death penalty have a problem with cruel and unusual punishment they can use Jack the Dripper’s painless cocktail. According to liberals doctor-assisted suicide is painless.
Who can swear that Terri Schiavo’s life force, her emotions, her ability to know life was not functioning? Say that a bird landed on Terri’s windowsill. How can anyone say that Terri did not experience the same pleasure and curiosity that makes an infant giggle? The euthanasia crowd will never admit to that possibility because they only speak for themselves. They assume that because they do not want to live in a so-called vegetative state no one else does either.
My point: A brain dead vegetative state is a physical thing with no proof that thoughts and emotions are not alive and well somewhere else. People in the West assigned courage and cowardliness to the heart: “He has the heart of a lion” or “He is fainthearted.” The Chinese always thought the liver was the most important organ. That shows there has always been a suspicion that thoughts and emotions reside somewhere other than in the brain.
I never came across a great body of thought that put the brain at the center of life. Those who believe in euthanasia are the only ones who say that. I do not consider their political agenda a great body of thought.
If I am absolutely correct about this ——Terri’s very essence was starved in the cruelest way imaginable.
Agree or disagree with removing Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube, but you cannot deny that an individual got away with killing her because justification —— not the act —— was the deciding factor. By exonerating the person who did the act, did not the courts endorse the Nazi defense —— I was only following orders. Bottom line: The courts must always judge the act not the justification.
Florida’s courts allowed it, and the US Supreme Court refused to hear Schiavo’s case. Had the SCOTUS taken the case you can be certain the butchers would have screamed about the government interfering in our lives. Naturally, it is not government interference when a state court orders the feeding tube removed. The person who actually pulled the plug committed murder. I never found the name of the person who removed the feeding tube? And I never understood why in hell they were not arrested for premeditated murder?
Why murder? And why premeditated?
A person had to commit the physical act of removing the feeding tube well-knowing Terri’s death would be the result. That is premeditated murder. Think of it this way. Suppose the individual who removed Terri’s feeding tube had the court’s permission to shoot her rather than let her starve to death. Would that be premeditated murder?
Parenthetically, TV viewers are bombarded with government propaganda depicting hard-hitting cops and district attorneys ever-ready to lockup the bad guys, yet someone commits a deliberate act that ends in the death of another person and there are no cops or district attorneys in sight. In fact, the policeman on duty in Terri’s room was told to leave the room so he could not be a called as a witness to identify the murderer.
In addition, judges in Terri’s case are guilty of aiding and abetting a premeditated homicide. At the very least, someone in authority should have told those judges: “If you want that feeding tube removed come and do it yourself.” I know that if I worked at Terri’s hospice and someone ordered me to remove her feeding tube, I would have told them where to shove the job.
And how many Americans realize that Socialist priests in our courts issue orders while making damn sure that real blood does not soil their precious judicial robes.
And of course there is always this: “America is a nation of laws.” What a joke that is. America is a nation of judges issuing orders. Neither judges nor anyone else had the Right to end Terri’s life just because she could not speak for herself.
NOTE: The Left is forever citing the Nazis as the only villains in the twentieth century. Some try to equate conservatives to Nazis, yet a close look always shows that Socialists are the Nazi clones. Not punishing Terri Schiavo’s murderer is only one such example.
To justify taking an innocent individual’s life opens the door to governments murdering millions. If the tens of millions of murders done by governments in the last century taught anything it is that there is no slope slipperier than cultivating the government’s bloodlust. Bottom line: Never, never, never, give the government the authority to kill innocent people.
The road to governments slaughtering their own people begins with the public’s acceptance of things like mercy killing, doctor-assisted suicide, abortion on demand, and so on. The sheer number of abortions makes it the worst mass murder. Slaughtering tens of millions of infants (hundreds of millions worldwide) became doing a kindness for mothers.
A long time ago I asked myself what inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart had my mother aborted me? I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey. Science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so Democrats can hear them.
Finally, was I too hard on judges? Hardly! A snake is a snake; a judge is a judge. A venomous snake may drowse in a bed of flowers, but it remains a deadly snake. Snakes and judges do what they will do. They are creatures of habit no more able to change their ways than the Earth can alter its orbit around the sun.
This country’s euthanasia crowd already cite the healthcare systems in the UK, Canada, and Cuba as models of compassion. After Canada legislates government-approved euthanasia you can expect Democrats to push for a similar law. Should Congress drop the ball on the goal line they will turn to lawyers on the U.S. Supreme Court to legislate another Roe v. Wade.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
fully immersed in faith..
if you really said that I need to add you to my ignore list.......As I said many times “Nazi Germany’s occupation was the last good thing to happen in the Netherlands.”
Flanders (12-24-2018)
Verified User
Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet
To PostmodernProphet: Thank you. I could not ask for more.
ADDENDUM FOR EVERYBODY ELSE
Senate Bill 145 prohibits doctors from performing dilation and evacuation abortions, an abortion method used when women are between 13 and 24 weeks pregnant. Dilation abortion involves tearing the fetus apart limb by limb so that the body parts can be extracted from the womb.
Ohio Outlaws Abortion Method That Dismembers Unborn Babies
2:07 PM 12/23/2018 | US
Grace Carr | Reporter
https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/23/o...ment-abortion/
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Verified User
If someone thinks their suffering is too much to tolerate, it is not your decision. A friend had a grandmother who was Kavorkianed. She had alzheimers and saw everyday something else evaporated from her life. She saw a future of being a vegetable and unable to care for herself. She would have had to rely on people in the future to do whatever they would do. She would not know or be able to control it. That was a horrible futiure for her that was terrifying . She wanted to do something when she still had the ability and the power to make her own decision.
There is no place in that situation for Flanders.
Guno צְבִי (12-24-2018)
Never Again
Youth in asia?
“If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”
— Golda Meir
Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.
“If Hamas put down their weapons, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons, there would be no Israel."
ברוך השם
Verified User
To Nordberg: Do you know the difference between making a choice and being euthanized by the government against your will?
NOTE: Nobody needs the government’s help, or permission, to commit suicide.
And lets not forget eugenics:
Population control is the goal of ruling classes everywhere —— beginning with the Eugenics Movement in Teddy Roosevelt’s time. Defeating Nazi Germany’s eugenics policies changed nothing:
Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a “family planning” summit with abortionists and the United Nations.
Bill Gates: World needs fewer people
Joins abortionists for 'family planning' conference on eugenics
Published: 08/19/2012 at 4:36 PM
by BOB UNRUH
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/bill-gate...-fewer-people/
This probably went over your head; so I will repeat it for your benefit:
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Verified User
You make so many statements that you think are factual, like population control is the goal of ruling classes everywhere. That is your belief, totally unsubstantiated. If they wanted that, they would be pushing casual and easy to obtain abortion around the globe. But they do not. Most countries, with a modicum of civilization are ending capital punishment too. They are missing chances to kill citizens aren't they?
Guno צְבִי (12-25-2018)
Verified User
To Nordberg: So either population controls do not exist, or the poor are demanding population control methods for themselves, while Bill and Melinda Gates are minding their own business:
To Nordberg: Get real. The wealthy are not only pushing population controls with countless scare tactics, they tied them to abortion:
But Kerry has gone what in better days would have been universally held to be one bridge too far. In a speech last year to the NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner, he gave an intellectually suicidal summary of his views.
He began by saying that "there is no overturning of Roe v. Wade." He went on: "There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life or health." That statement of course begs the question on which the entire Congress and the state legislatures and the Supreme Court have been stalled for years, namely, Is the invocation of "health," if made by the woman alone, conclusive in authorizing abortion? If so, Roe v. Wade, which did not authorize willful third-trimester abortions, stands to be revised as the Roe-Wade-Kerry decision.
Kerry continued: "There (shall be) no more cutbacks on population control efforts around the world."
This endorses abortion Chinese-style. Too many people? Too few abortions.
But the eye-popper was still to come: "We need to honestly and confidently and candidly take this issue out to the country and we need to speak up and be proud of what we stand for."
But Kerry says he personally opposes abortion. Where is he exhibiting his pride in what he stands for? Whom has he counseled against abortion? A nun somewhere, out of earshot?
Crooked thought
William F. Buckley
February 26, 2004
http://townhall.com/columnists/willi...rooked_thought
To Nordberg: No they are not unless you consider China uncivilized:
China executes more people than rest of world combined, Amnesty report reveals
Colin Drury
Thursday 12 April 2018 09:34
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8300726.html
To Nordberg: Nice try:
Parenthetically, the argument for abolishing the death penalty began with:
BLACKSTONE’S RATIO
Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer. William Blackstone (1723 – 1780)
Take a look at the death penalty in relation to Blackstone’s Ratio.
Liberals always argue that the death penalty does not deter murder. That argument is absurd on the face of it. Execute a murderer and he/she will not murder again. Abolishing the death penalty most certainly will NOT deter murder.
The next favorite argument against the death penalty says that an innocent man cannot be brought back to life after he is executed. That line of reasoning is a piece of legal sophistry rooted in Blackstone’s Ratio.
Parenthetically, Blackstone’s Ratio depends upon who you quote. Charles Dickens put the morning line at 99 to 1 in favor of the criminals.
Blackstone’s Ratio probably made sense hundreds of years ago. It makes no sense today when you look at all of the protection criminals are given before trial in this country. Murderers are given even more protections in the form of endless appeals after they are found guilty. Twenty years or more often elapses before a murderer is finally executed. And executions are disappearing each time a state legislator abolishes the death penalty. Indeed, fewer executions take place than the number of convicted murderers released.
I doubt if all of those convicted murderers being set free are not guilty twenty years after being convicted. There is too much room for bribery and tampering with evidence to convince me that so many prosecutors made so many mistakes. Or maybe juries made all of those mistakes which does not say much for the jury system.
Life without parole is another myth.
A loophole in the 1987 life-without-parole law allows inmates to apply for clemency. In a move to clarify who might be eligible for clemency, the state Pardon and Parole Board recently enacted a policy that gives inmates with this sentence a chance for early release after 15 years.
Loophole lets inmates seek parole Board changes life sentence policy
Bob Doucette
Published: Sat, March 9, 2002 12:00 AM
https://newsok.com/article/2784964/l...entence-policy
Long before 1987 Clarence Darrow not only beat the death penalty he beat life without parole.
I believe that Leopold and Loeb beating the hangman was the most influential decision ever handed down in death penalty cases. Clarence Darrow’s entire defense was designed to beat the death penalty rather than get Leopold and Loeb off.
With their sons facing the hangman, the killers’ rich families called in a legal luminary — Clarence Darrow, 66, famed for saving 100 defendants from execution.
“Not guilty,” the original plea, would have put them before a jury, not a wise move with a pair of defendants as arrogant and unlikable as Leopold and Loeb.
Today’s touchy-feely garbage and psycho-babble gained nationwide acceptance because the Bobby Franks murder case got more publicity than did all of Darrow’s previous 100 death penalty cases combined.
Darrow, in a stunning move, changed the plea to guilty. Their case, with a parade of alienists, as psychiatrists were known in those days, would be presented to the judge, who would decide on life or death. In a three-day summation, Darrow quoted poetry, history and science in a plea for mercy so eloquent even the judge got misty-eyed. Darrow said that the boys, although not legally insane, were mentally ill and not responsible for their actions. “They killed him as they might kill a spider or a fly.”
Darrow ended up with two more notches on his saved-from-the-hangman’s belt. The judge gave his clients life plus 99 years.
90th anniversary of Leopold and Loeb's horrific murder
BY Mara Bovsun
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Saturday, May 17, 2014, 9:47 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crim...icle-1.1796537
Life plus 99 years got lost when Leopold was paroled in 1958. Note that life without parole became another judicial myth after it was attached to a life sentence. Even worse, Darrow gave “. . . alienists, as psychiatrists were known in those days . . .” a vote in deciding guilty or not guilty. It will not be long before lawyers call upon “expert astrologists” reading tarot cards decide punishment.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Verified User
The OP might as well be closed, because it makes no sense.
Guno צְבִי (12-25-2018)
Verified User
CORRECTION
I never trusted John Kasich. He vetoed the bill. If Kasich was not such a goddamned liar he could have signed the bill and taken the money away from Planned Parenthood’s butcher shops:
Kasich identifies as pro-life but argued in his veto statement that the bill was likely unconstitutional and would result in a costly court battle for the state.
Ohio Gov Kasich Vetoes Bill Banning Abortion After Detection of a Fetal Heartbeat
Lauretta Brown
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 3:30 PM
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/lauret...tbeat-n2538020
Here is another reason for American voters to distrust John Kasich should he crawl out from under his rock in 2020:
Republican Ohio Gov. John Kasich, considering a presidential run, strongly attacked critics of the Common Core educational program so wildly unpopular among conservative activists.
XXXXX
The program was funded largely by the Bill Gates Foundation and backed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, without much input from parents, say critics.
Left praises Kasich for support of Common Core
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 01/25/2015 @ 6:33 pm
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/left-prai...f-common-core/
I cannot count the times Common Core’s defenders objected whenever I married the United Nations to Common Core. Regardless of the proofs I posted, my opposites swore to high heaven that the United Nations had nothing to do with the so-called education standards CC imposes on American children and their parents. Their best argument was that each one of our states writes their own rules. Presidential wannabe Kasich made that claim:
John Kasich's Common Core lie
By Jason Russell | May 2, 2015 | 5:00 am
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jo...rticle/2563898
Nothing is further from the truth. The philosophy driving Common Core originated in the bowels of the United Nations before it was written and forced on the states by the federal government. CC would have gone nowhere without the U.N.’s political muscle needed to ram Common Core down the throats of the American people. These excerpts from Leo Hohmann’s great piece obliterates any defense Common Core supporters offer:
He said the program was inspired by the concepts of “experiential education” advocated by the likes of John Dewey, Montessori, and the Model United Nations program that has been taught in schools for decades.
“It is not to indoctrinate; it is to have students engage in conflict resolution so they learn negotiating skills,” he said. “So Charles Jacobs’ claims, when he’s using old material, and saying it’s to indoctrinate, are a lie.”
XXXXX
Schools going global with support of U.N.
By incorporating globalist principles into the curriculum, students are taught to be good “citizens of the world” as opposed to good citizens of America, whose sovereign status is seen as subservient to that of the United Nations and other global institutions, said Alex Newman, co-author of a new book, “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children.”
“It is really amazing how open and transparent the U.N. and especially UNESCO, led by an actual communist, has become in its ‘global citizen’ indoctrination programs,” Newman said, referring to Irina Bokova, a Bulgarian communist and current UNESCO chief.
These attempts to globalize the classrooms and turn students against the idea of being Americans first have been hiding in plain view for a long time, Newman said, yet he’s seen very little push-back from states or local school boards. That’s probably because the curricula comes with federal funding, and states are always looking for ways to augment their budgets with federal dollars.
“All over their websites, they brag about transforming children’s attitudes, views, beliefs and behavior using so-called education,” Newman said. “They’ve been doing this openly for decades, as we show, using primary-source documents, in ‘Crimes of the Educators.’”
Obama’s secretary of education, Arne Duncan, even boasts that, “with UNESCO as his ‘global partner,’ they are using government schools to indoctrinate students, even calling education a ‘weapon’ to ‘change the world,’” Newman said. “This should be very disturbing to anyone who values liberty, Judeo-Christian values, biblical religion, national sovereignty, and the principles America was founded upon. It needs to be exposed and shut down.”
Hobert is an academic leader in the push toward “global citizenship.” He created his nonprofit, “Axis of Hope,” in 2002 to, as he says, “teach youth in their formative years of life what I call preventative diplomacy; how to work together as a team to prevent conflict. Are they going to prevent conflict, or are they going to get out there and try to make a lot of money, and exacerbate conflict?”
Boston University has supported Hobert’s Axis of Hope vision but recommended he change the name to the Global Literacy Institute. Teachers from around the world will be able to come and learn from Hobert how to teach their students to resolve problems on a global, national and local level, he said.
Common Core teaches kids to 'divide Jerusalem'
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 05/20/2015 @ 8:37 pm
http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/common-co...rusalem/print/
p.s. Please read this article if you read nothing else:
John Dewey: Bosom Serpent of American Education
Kelly OConnell Sunday, February 24, 2013
http://canadafreepress.com/article/j...ican-education
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Verified User
195 countries in the world. 9 had executions last year. Not exactly an upward trend. Only 86 permit it. Your facts are made up. Calling Planned Parenthoos a butcher shop shows how honest you are. Abortion is a small slice of the services they provide. They are the only healthcare that exists in many poor neighborhoods , They provide many health services for those of small means.
Last edited by Nordberg; 12-25-2018 at 11:45 AM.
Verified User
To Nordberg: Stop confusing your worldview with your wish list before your nose starts growing.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Verified User
To Nordberg: So did Jack the Ripper who never got caught.
December 30, 2018
Public employees fighting to keep their identities secret in abortion body parts case
By Rick Moran
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...arts_case.html
Those baby body parts come from Planed Parenthood butcher shops.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Verified User
Butcher Torres is afraid the screams might be recorded:
The abortionist who earlier this year boasted she prevents unborn babies from screaming by cutting their vocal cords is stirring controversy again, reports Breitbart News.
She would still enjoy the slaughter if nobody ever heard of God:
Responding to a tweet wondering what God thinks of her profession, Utah abortionist Leah Torres said, “God performs way more abortions than I do, so there’s that.”
Birth prevention is a sneaky synonym for population control:
Last week she tweeted that she had no problem using abortion as “birth prevention.”
The scum in Congress are just as guilty as Torres because they pay tax dollars to maintain the slaughter houses:
“I feel fine about that,” wrote Torres, who works at Planned Parenthood’s Metro Health Center in Salt Lake City.
Abortionist: 'God performs way more abortions than I do'
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 01/02/2019 @ 7:47 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/abortion...ons-than-i-do/
Seven lawyers codified the killing. Countless lawyers protect the killings, and the killers, including protecting the legal profession.
The number of federal lawmakers with law degrees will drop slightly when the 114th Congress meets in January.
Beginning next year, 160 members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 53 of U.S. senators will have law degrees, the National Law Journal (sub. req.) reports. At the beginning of the 113th Congress, there were 169 lawmakers with JDs in the house and 57 in the Senate.
The National Law Journal lists four new senators who are lawyers (three were former House members) and 16 new House members who are lawyers. “Among the new lawyer-legislators,” the story says, “are solo practitioners and big firm partners, statehouse mainstays and a stay-at-home-mom-turned-school-administrator, lobbyists and businessmen, and military veterans from four armed services.”
http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...e_in_congress/
NOTE: Lawyers outnumber non-lawyers in the Senate. That makes me question how much the XVII Amendment contributed to infanticide. The late Ted Kennedy (1932 - 2009) was a long-serving senator who devoted his career to killing babies.
Senator Ted Kennedy was an angel of death. He was always an angel of death. Ted Kennedy devoted himself to slaughtering children in the womb. Over 55 million dead to date. Planned Parenthood’s butchery is Kennedy’s legacy. There is no more accurate biography of Ted Kennedy’s life than the legislation he championed.
Parenthetically, long-serving representatives are just as bad as long-serving senators. Nancy Pelosi has been in the House since 1987. She is one of the foulest woman that ever lived. People in her district elect her, and the media treats her like she is a decent human whose opinion is worthy of respect. Today, Pelosi will again be elected Speaker of the House by fellow butchers.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Verified User
He proved my case:
On Saturday afternoon, Mr. Dozier, 48, threaded a bedsheet through an air vent in his cell at the state prison in Ely, Nev., and hanged himself, prison officials said, ending one of the most significant and bizarre death penalty cases in recent years, one that highlighted the contradictions and shifting politics of modern capital punishment in America.
After Years of Delays and No Execution Date in Sight, a Death Row Inmate Takes His Life
By Richard A. Oppel Jr.
Jan. 7, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/07/u...ow-nevada.html
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Posting Rules
Bookmarks