Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 59

Thread: Democrat Party’s Brand Of Intolerance

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Do you know why there are civil rights laws against discrimination, stupid fuck?
    To Domer76: Do you know why there are special privileges laws, asshole?

    Incidentally, attaching every cause to a greater issue is hardly new. Attaching homosexuality to so-called abortion Rights is the same thing homosexuals did with the Civil Rights Movement —— homosexuals and black Americans require special privileges. Sad to say, the privileges both groups got under the banner of Civil Rights were taken away from everybody else. If you plan on replying be sure to include one Right EVERY AMERICAN gets. In short: It ain't a Right when somebody else pays for it.


    PLEASE —— no moral horseshit to justify taken Rights away from everybody you disagree with.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...79#post2799279
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    I posted numerous messages about involuntary servitude cases since Elane Photography first hit the news:

    The New Mexico Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment does not protect the owners of a photography studio who refused, because of their Christians beliefs, to serve a lesbian couple.

    Judges order Christians to work for 'gays'
    Court rules photographers must violate religious faith
    Published: 08/22/2013 at 4:10 PM
    BOB UNRUH

    http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/judges-or...work-for-gays/

    Jack Phillips won his case in the Supreme Court, but that is not the end of it:





    Once the left embraced behavior and sexuality as a civil right, and did so with the full backing of our corrupt media, it was the beginning of the end for the most vital element of American life, that unwritten social compact that so beautifully nutshells the Constitution — the idea of “Live and Let Live.”

    For 200-plus years, the idea of live and let live helped to make America the freest nation on earth. Laws were not required to enforce this concept, because we were all raised right – taught that I may not agree with what you do or say, but as long as it doesn’t interfere with my right to do and say, I’ll defend your rights.

    Nolte: Colorado’s Religious Persecution of Masterpiece Cakeshop Continues
    by John Nolte
    20 Dec 2018

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...hop-continues/

    NOTE: No plaintiff ‘s lawyer ever fought his client’s case on the grounds of involuntary servitude:
    VIII Amendment

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
    XIII Amendment

    Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

    Involuntary servitude aside, it is “Live and Let Live” that caught my attention in John Nolte’s article. That is a topic that television’s media mouths dare not mention.

    The conspicuous manner that every organized religion’s true believers have in common is that not a one of them ever practices “Do not bother me and I will not bother you.” Or to use the better-known phrase “Live and Let Live.” Their reason is obvious. Parasites cannot live on tax dollars and also practice live and let live.

    I cannot count the number of Bible-thumpers that found my threads in 18 years. Live and let live is the only thing I ever wanted from Bible-thumpers, yet their talking points never included “let live.”

    Hanging onto the Second Amendment is the best chance Americans have of holding tyranny at bay. When all of the legal and philosophical arguments have been made CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED UNREGISTERED GUNS is the muscle that enforces live and let live.

    You might ask yourself why Americans are being asked to die fighting tyranny in foreign lands while marching quietly down the road to tyranny in their own country? If you are squeamish about the implications think of unregistered guns as a deterrent busybodies cannot accept.

    There is a deeper question that should be asked: Why are Democrats doing it? The simple answer is because they cannot mind their own goddamned business. Eric Hoffer’s great observation applies to Socialists much more than it applies to the followers of Supreme Deity religions:

    “To know a person's religion we need not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance.”

    Organized religions were never a threat to individual liberties in America. Before Socialists began their campaign to install their own religion as the state’s religion no one was forced to join a church, or support a religion not of their own choosing. Freedom of religion —— as it was practiced in America before Socialists infiltrated the highest levels of government —— basically said live and let live. Meddlers abhor the very concept of letting others live their lives as they see fit. Live and let live is their intolerance.

    It is not only dirty little moralists exercising political power that is destroying America’s moral fiber. Preventative medicine is more about the healthcare industry’s morality than it is about health. A nation of pill freaks buying prescription drugs to prevent this or that is the highest morality of all. Diet and exercise gurus promising healthier lives are moralists contradicting the pill priesthood if you do not count vitamins as pills.

    Preventative medicine is a pharmaceutical industry scam. Drug companies were not making enough money selling drugs to people who were actually sick; so they increased their sales a thousandfold with the preventative medicine con job. The whole thing is a perversion of an “An apple a day keeps the doctor away.”

    It turns out that doctors are worse than drug companies. Doctors aligned themselves with dirty little moralists when they started telling EVERYONE not to smoke. Do not smoke soon became lose weight and exercise. That was not enough. Doctors in Florida told their patients to get rid of their guns.

    Question: Doctors scream bloody murder when anybody interferes in the doctor-patient relationship; so
    how come doctors do not mind the ACLU getting in-between doctor and patient?

    Happily, doctors cannot hide the harm they are doing with their assault on the Second Amendment. So I fear this scenario:

    A patient gets rid of his gun on his doctor’s orders. A murderer breaks into the patient’s home and kills the patient’s children because he could not defend himself. The patient sues the doctor. How would you vote if you were on the jury?

    In the same vain, Americans must take a long, hard, look at tort reform before those bums in Washington include it in more “healthcare reform.” I do not have much use for lawyers, but lawyers, and they alone, are all that stands between the public and medical industry butchery protected by law.

    In short: when I need moral guidance I will go see the Pope not a doctor.

    There were propaganda moralists long before the others jumped on the morality bandwagon. Movies and TV shows have always been dirty little morality plays; the Twilight Zone was the worst of them but not by much.

    It can be argued that live and let live is also dogma, except that those of us who believe it do not give a rat’s ass how others live, worship, or eat; so long as they leave us alone.

    I still have not figured out how forcing others to pay for abortions equals live and let live.
    Just curious, would you be alright with a company refusing to do business with people for being a different race?

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Just curious, would you be alright with a company refusing to do business with people for being a different race?
    To StoneByStone: NO if you are talking about institutions enforcing involuntary servitude policies.

    An emphatic YES if you are talking individuals.

    A word of advice. Spend more time on formulating clever questions.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To StoneByStone: NO if you are talking about institutions enforcing involuntary servitude policies.

    An emphatic YES if you are talking individuals.

    A word of advice. Spend more time on formulating clever questions.
    I'm not sure why you got triggered by that, it was a pretty fair question.

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    I'm not sure why you got triggered by that, it was a pretty fair question.
    To StoneByStone: I am not sure why you think my answer was unfair.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To StoneByStone: I am not sure why you think my answer was unfair.
    I don't. I was just surprised that my question triggered you.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Bill (06-18-2019)

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,382
    Thanks
    12,187
    Thanked 14,288 Times in 10,487 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,908 Times in 4,224 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To Domer76: Do you know why there are special privileges laws, asshole?

    Incidentally, attaching every cause to a greater issue is hardly new. Attaching homosexuality to so-called abortion Rights is the same thing homosexuals did with the Civil Rights Movement —— homosexuals and black Americans require special privileges. Sad to say, the privileges both groups got under the banner of Civil Rights were taken away from everybody else. If you plan on replying be sure to include one Right EVERY AMERICAN gets. In short: It ain't a Right when somebody else pays for it.


    PLEASE —— no moral horseshit to justify taken Rights away from everybody you disagree with.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...79#post2799279
    Wrong again, stupid fuck. Same asswipe mantra you shitstains use every time.

    No “special rights”, you stupid fucking dumbfuck. Same rights.

    Fool.

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    I'm not sure why you got triggered by that, it was a pretty fair question.
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    I don't. I was just surprised that my question triggered you.

    To StoneByStone:
    You lost me. If you thought your question triggered me, logically, you must have concluded my answer was unfair. If not, why bring it up at all?
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post

    To StoneByStone:
    You lost me. If you thought your question triggered me, logically, you must have concluded my answer was unfair. If not, why bring it up at all?
    Well the answer was fine. But then you said I should work harder at coming up with clever questions, which was kind of strange.

  11. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    UPDATE

    Aaron and Melissa Klein were fined $135,000 for refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding.

    U.S. Supreme Court justices on Monday sidestepped another opportunity to determine if LGBTQ rights trump the Constitution’s protection of the exercise of religion.

    Nevertheless, they ruled in favor of the owners of an Oregon bakery, Sweetcakes by Melissa, who declined to make a cake for a same-sex wedding. The ruling vacated a state court decision against Aaron and Melissa Klein, eliminating a $135,000 fine. And it directed state appellate judges to reconsider the case in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of Colorado baker Jack Phillips.

    Supremes make major ruling regarding Christian bakers
    Posted By Bob Unruh On 06/17/2019 @ 1:42 pm

    https://www.wnd.com/2019/06/supremes...istian-bakers/
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  12. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Just curious, would you be alright with a company refusing to do business with people for being a different race?
    You asking the question is a fallacy; because homosexuals are not a race.

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  13. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Flanders (06-18-2019)

  14. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,203
    Thanks
    9,673
    Thanked 22,602 Times in 17,045 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Wrong again, stupid fuck. Same asswipe mantra you shitstains use every time.

    No “special rights”, you stupid fucking dumbfuck. Same rights.

    Fool.
    You're slipping, dickhead. Only 3 profane (I used "you stupid fucking dumbfuck" as 1) insults in 2 short sentences...
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Flanders (06-18-2019)

  16. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    You asking the question is a fallacy; because homosexuals are not a race.
    I know they're not a race. I'm asking about race because I'm curious about consistency.
    Do you think it's ok to deny service to someone based on race?

  17. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Do you think it's ok to deny service to someone based on race?
    To StoneByStone: Absolutely. Every self-employed individual has the Right to choose who they work for.

    Even employees can quit if the boss orders them to perform involuntary servitude.


    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Just curious, would you be alright with a company refusing to do business with people for being a different race?
    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To StoneByStone: NO if you are talking about institutions enforcing involuntary servitude policies.

    An emphatic YES if you are talking individuals.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  18. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To StoneByStone: Absolutely. Every self-employed individual has the Right to choose who they work for.

    Even employees can quit if the boss orders them to perform involuntary servitude.
    Thank you for answering. I feel the same way.

Similar Threads

  1. APP - It must be really bad for the democrat party
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-24-2018, 07:01 AM
  2. APP - Way to go democrat party
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-04-2017, 05:53 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-24-2017, 09:53 AM
  4. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 11-19-2016, 06:37 AM
  5. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 12-01-2009, 01:48 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •