Originally Posted by
danielpalos
The buyers were not doing any Thing illegal;
To danielpalos: Massachusetts played first and loose with Pope’s adage:
First we tolerate, then pity, then embrace, then legislate.
Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in the U.S. state of Massachusetts since May 17, 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruling in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health that it was unconstitutional under the Massachusetts Constitution to allow only opposite-sex couples to marry. Massachusetts became the sixth jurisdiction in the world (after the Netherlands, Belgium, Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec) to legalize same-sex marriage. It was the first U.S. state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-s..._Massachusetts
In truth, same sex marriage is ‘legal’ because the U.S. Supreme court failed to defend individuals:
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision Friday that recognizes same-sex marriage as legal and deems state-level bans on it unconstitutional.
The ruling in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, backed by five on the nine-justice panel, is expected to pave the way for legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide at a time when an increasing number of countries such as those in Europe allow homosexual couples to marry legally.
https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/...e-sex-marriage
Originally Posted by
danielpalos
thus, they also have First Amendment protection from the seller; who is not any form of Religious authority but only and merely part of the Laity . . .
To danielpalos: According to you the First Amendment only protects filthy priests —— the very people who are trying to abolish individual Rights altogether.
Note that priests began doing their dirty business two hundred years ago:
In 1813 the Roman Catholic Church shot holes in the Constitution when priests were given the confessional-privilege. In plain English, priests got the opening they needed to legitimate coerced charity incrementally. (Doctors, lawyers, journalists, and psychiatrists followed priests with similar protections codified by politicians.)
Priests have been a pestilence infecting mankind from the day money was invented; so I would take the privilege away from priests first. If anyone is dumb enough to tell priests anything they do not deserve protection.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...he-4th-Of-July
Bookmarks