See again, you prove you don’t know even something as fundamental as a scientific theory.
Biological evolution by means of natural selection is a scientific theory.
Creationism is religion and has nothing to do with science. It is not a scientific theory.
Abiogenesis is an unproven scientific hypothesis. It is not a scientific theory.
You really need to try studying some science dude. You have no idea how funny you are.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
CharacterAssassin (01-19-2019)
Sorry Thaichi but that’s a philosophical belief. Not a scientific one. Science only explains the factual basis of naturally occurring events or phenomena. It has nothing to say about other philosophical beliefs or faith.
It would be erroneous to say religious beliefs and scientific understanding are incompatible. That would be an utterly false dichotomy. They are though non-overlapping magesteria.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
I see... so why then have a vast number of predictions based on evolutionary theory been independently verified? Why are most of the applied life sciences in part or are wholly based on evolutionary theory? Why are thousands upon thousands of independent scientists wrong but you are right?
It boils down to this, as a Biologist, unless you can provide a workable scientific alternative to model speciation, your arguments are simply a waste of our time. Write us when you have something. We have serious work to do.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Sure we do. Circulatory systems evolved before hemopoetic circulatory systems as endothelial systems that overcame the time constraint barriers of simple diffusion. That occurred over 600 million years ago.
Around 550 million years ago an endothelial system evolved in an ancestral vertebrate to optimize flow dynamics and barrier functions and/or to localize immune or coagulation functions. Endothelial heterogeneity evolved as a core function of endothelium from the outset reflecting its role in meeting the diverse needs of body tissues.
Last edited by Mott the Hoople; 01-19-2019 at 09:11 AM.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
kudzu (01-19-2019)
kudzu (01-19-2019), Mott the Hoople (01-19-2019)
The basic problem with anyone claiming that "MUTATIONS" cause evolution is the documented fact that mutations do occur but when something is MUTATED that simply means that an error has happened within the dna code, SOMETHING IS TAKEN AWAY BY MUTATION NOT ADDED. Take for example.....inbreeding causes mutation. Is that evolution? Hardly...all you get is deformity. Why? Because the original DNA chain was corrupted. Nothing evolves by mutation....especially in a MACO example of life. Some point to germs mutating(micro)...….and becoming resistant to treatment. But are they really mutating or ADOPTING because they already possess the required DNA signature to adapt when required and it lies dormant until required?
Every life form has the ability to adapt to a changing environment.....if such were not true mankind would have been wiped from the face of the earth the first time he came into contact with a simple virus.
CharacterAssassin (01-22-2019)
Bookmarks