Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 179

Thread: Is Special Counsel Mueller’s Office About to Have Its First Conviction Overturned?

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,138
    Thanks
    9,837
    Thanked 33,892 Times in 21,656 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,684 Times in 5,187 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Last week, both special counsel Robert Mueller’s office and former national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s defense team submitted dueling memorandums to U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, who is preparing to sentence Flynn on Dec. 18.

    Flynn’s filing brought up the subject of FD-302 forms, which are the official records that FBI agents file following interviews with subjects of interest. In its memo, the defense noted that a 302 form provided by Mueller’s office was dated Aug. 22, 2017, more than six months after the FBI’s interview with Flynn actually took place.

    Since FBI rules and regulations state that 302s must be filled out within five days of the interview, the fact that the Flynn memorandum referenced a 302 form filled out and filed more than six months later garnered immediate attention in the news media.

    A curious feature of this months-late 302 form was noted by my colleague, Jeff Carlson, in his recent column in The Epoch Times, titled “New FBI 302 Document Appears to Reveal Interview With Agents–Not Flynn.”

    This particular 302 form, which is cited five times on Page 14 of the Flynn memorandum, is an interview with former FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok, who was subsequently fired from the agency after an extensive investigation by Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

    https://m.theepochtimes.com/could-th...mpression=true

    Mueller is Heinrich Himmler meets “The Naked Gun.”
    Flynn would have to move to withdraw the plea, something, despite months of you fools saying he should, he has refused to do.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    What happened to "collusion" wid da Russians?
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  3. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    What happened to "collusion" wid da Russians?
    Why do you think something happened to it? Did Mueller tell you he couldn't find anything or did he say to wait until he is good and ready?

  4. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Mueller has Flynn legally, morally, and ethically committed to his plea deal, conviction, and coming sentence.

    Anyone who holds out hope for this case to be overturned is an . . . idiot, such as getin the ring and truth detector.

    That is the only appropriate characterization.

    You conspiracy righties need to start taking your meds.
    It takes a LOT OF CHUTZPAH to talk about morals and ethics when it comes to Mueller!!

  5. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Flynn would have to move to withdraw the plea, something, despite months of you fools saying he should, he has refused to do.
    he can move to have it overturned without withdrawal

  6. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,138
    Thanks
    9,837
    Thanked 33,892 Times in 21,656 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,684 Times in 5,187 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Why did Trump fire Flynn?

  7. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Why did Trump fire Flynn?
    why did Mueller ask Flynn what he said when they already had the transcript?

  8. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,138
    Thanks
    9,837
    Thanked 33,892 Times in 21,656 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,684 Times in 5,187 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    why did Mueller ask Flynn what he said when they already had the transcript?
    To see if he would lie. If he would lie it was a big deal, because it meant that he was succeptable to blackmail. A matter of national security.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    mak2 (12-19-2018)

  10. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    To see if he would lie. If he would lie it was a big deal, because it meant that he was succeptable to blackmail. A matter of national security.
    what "blackmail",, and no it doesn't.
    Yates used the Logan act as a cover of "illegal activities" to bring in the FBI

    https://thedeepstate.com/case-entrap...michael-flynn/
    It is now conclusively established that there was nothing unlawful about Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak (see below) whilst Yates’s claim that Flynn had exposed himself to blackmail by the Russians by lying to Pence and others about his conversations with Kislyak is too ridiculous to be taken seriously.

    McGahn’s reported initial reaction to Yates’s complaint – “Why does it matter to the Department of Justice whether one White House official lies to another White House official?” – was the correct one.

  11. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    everything Mueller is doing, is about to be thrown out, rendered partisan hack job
    the FBI, and the entire Obama bag of nut-cases were all up to no good, and they are getting exposed, one rat at a time

    It all comes out in the wash, as they say

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mis...encing-hearing

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Why do you think something happened to it? Did Mueller tell you he couldn't find anything or did he say to wait until he is good and ready?
    what's he waiting for, Jan 2025
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    dukkha (12-17-2018)

  13. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,138
    Thanks
    9,837
    Thanked 33,892 Times in 21,656 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,684 Times in 5,187 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    what "blackmail",, and no it doesn't.
    Yates used the Logan act as a cover of "illegal activities" to bring in the FBI

    https://thedeepstate.com/case-entrap...michael-flynn/
    It is now conclusively established that there was nothing unlawful about Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak (see below) whilst Yates’s claim that Flynn had exposed himself to blackmail by the Russians by lying to Pence and others about his conversations with Kislyak is too ridiculous to be taken seriously.

    McGahn’s reported initial reaction to Yates’s complaint – “Why does it matter to the Department of Justice whether one White House official lies to another White House official?” – was the correct one.
    You are getting very far away from the important question, I understand why, but that question is, did flan lie to the FBI?

  14. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,138
    Thanks
    9,837
    Thanked 33,892 Times in 21,656 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,684 Times in 5,187 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    everything Mueller is doing, is about to be thrown out, rendered partisan hack job
    the FBI, and the entire Obama bag of nut-cases were all up to no good, and they are getting exposed, one rat at a time

    It all comes out in the wash, as they say

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mis...encing-hearing



    what's he waiting for, Jan 2025
    You have been saying that for over a year now. It only gets worse for the president.

    I am laughing at you.

  15. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    You are getting very far away from the important question, I understand why, but that question is, did flan lie to the FBI?
    sure he lied about discussing sanctions - so what?
    What business was it of the FBI what he and Kysliak discussed? What business is it of the FBI if Flynn lied to Pense?

    and AGAIN the process the FBI used to get Flynn to "lie" was so egregious.

    Again it was a PROCESS CRIME -if this bullshit investigation ( which is what i was - not a "interview" as sold by Mccabe) there would have been no lie to the FBI?

    classic entrapment

  16. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Mueller has Flynn legally, morally, and ethically committed to his plea deal, conviction, and coming sentence.

    Anyone who holds out hope for this case to be overturned is an . . . idiot.

    That is the only appropriate characterization.

    You conspiracy righties need to start taking your meds.

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    just shut up while only a few are laughing at you, really dude, stupid is as stupid does
    You fool, it is you who is laughed at every single day on this Board. You are incredibly dense, so you are now The Dense Dunce.

    Noise is another charter member of The Dense Dunce Gang. He has no idea what a 'process crime' is, which much less what it means. And the FBI has every right to investigate members of the government who are hobbing with those they should not be nobbing if they can't tell the truth about it.

    And each day is worse than the day before, increasingly a bad day each and every day for the President.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    mak2 (12-19-2018)

  18. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Last week, both special counsel Robert Mueller’s office and former national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s defense team submitted dueling memorandums to U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, who is preparing to sentence Flynn on Dec. 18.

    Flynn’s filing brought up the subject of FD-302 forms, which are the official records that FBI agents file following interviews with subjects of interest. In its memo, the defense noted that a 302 form provided by Mueller’s office was dated Aug. 22, 2017, more than six months after the FBI’s interview with Flynn actually took place.

    Since FBI rules and regulations state that 302s must be filled out within five days of the interview, the fact that the Flynn memorandum referenced a 302 form filled out and filed more than six months later garnered immediate attention in the news media.

    A curious feature of this months-late 302 form was noted by my colleague, Jeff Carlson, in his recent column in The Epoch Times, titled “New FBI 302 Document Appears to Reveal Interview With Agents–Not Flynn.”

    This particular 302 form, which is cited five times on Page 14 of the Flynn memorandum, is an interview with former FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok, who was subsequently fired from the agency after an extensive investigation by Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

    https://m.theepochtimes.com/could-th...mpression=true

    Mueller is Heinrich Himmler meets “The Naked Gun.”
    EPOCH TIMES? Seriously?
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

Similar Threads

  1. Robert Mueller: Woman targeted by inept plot to bring down US special counsel reveals
    By jimmymccready in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-03-2018, 11:25 AM
  2. Trump might have grounds to fire special counsel Robert Mueller
    By hvilleherb in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-24-2018, 07:20 AM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-16-2017, 09:57 PM
  4. Replies: 142
    Last Post: 05-18-2017, 09:46 AM
  5. DeLay conviction overturned
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-19-2013, 12:10 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •