The U.N.’s Prize

[Flanders]

newspeak (noun)

Deliberately ambiguous and contradictory language used to mislead and manipulate the public.

Forget media newspeak about funding, or not funding, the wall for a few days and keep your eye on the U.N.’s prize:

POLITICAL ASYLUM IN EVERY FIRST WORLD COUNTRY FOR THIRD WORLD ECONOMIC REFUGEES.

They lied.

For months proponents of the UN Migration Pact told us that the pact was non-binding. The response to the many citizens of nation states worldwide having signed country specific petitions was that it was non-binding so there was nothing to worry about, it was going to be good.

The immensely opposed and disastrous document declares unlimited migration to be treated as a human right, thereby deprecating the term ‘illegal migrants’, and criminalises any criticism of migration as hate speech.

The points that raised alarm for most was that it seeks to eliminate all forms of dissent. Media organisations for example, should they criticise anything to do with migration would lose access to state funding. People would be labelled as racists or guilty of hate speech which will now be criminalised. This pact will literally erase our borders.

The question I’ve been asking is if the countries that refused to sign, are they still bound to it being members of the UN. Most people were of the mind that it would only affect the signatories.

Now we know. In a frank exchange with Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Mr. Hebner of the AfD drew out an admission that it is, in fact, legally binding. As well, that it will be adopted as rule for all UN Member states once enacted.

Mr. Hebner asks: “You can see for yourself clearly that during the conference, the spokesperson for Morocco emphasised that the agreement was legally binding. He said clearly, in a literal sense, that there is a corresponding legal bond for all nations taking part as well as an obligation of implementation. You and your delegation did not raise a single word of objection to that statement but idly accepted it. I would like to emphasise that the parliamentary motion was not presented at the conference. “

Ms. Merkel’s response not only confirmed what we at Voice of Europe have been suspecting all along, the claim it is indeed binding, but that once voted and accepted it will be valid for all:

“So then, during the UN General Assembly next week, the pact will once again be up for debate and a decision will be made on whether to accept it. At this time, a member state can demand a vote. When two-thirds of the represented countries agree then it is valid for all. That’s how majority decision-making works.”

They lied: The UN Migration Pact IS legally binding and could be valid FOR ALL countries
By Laura Cat 15 December 2018

https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/12/th...all-countries/

[Flanders]

We will no longer surrender our nation to the false song of globalism.

To Legion: I will believe it after H.R. 193 gets a vote.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...-bill/193/text

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...78#post2756578

[Adolf_Twitler]

There are people who can live their entire lives and be happier than a dog with two dicks- while never helping a soul ever!

And then there are responsible, moral, and caring people!

The same thing can be said of nations!

[Flanders]

There are people who can live their entire lives and be happier than a dog with two dicks- while never helping a soul ever!

And then there are responsible, moral, and caring people!

The same thing can be said of nations!

To Adolf_Twitler: And there are people and nations whose caring must be bought and paid for with tax dollars. They are called parasites.

[FUCK THE POLICE]

The UN Migration pact is non-binding. No UN institution besides the security council has any ability to make a legally binding commitment. Cry more.

[FUCK THE POLICE]

To Adolf_Twitler: And there are people and nations whose caring must be bought and paid for with tax dollars. They are called parasites.

Immigrants are an investment, when in history has this investment not paid off and those immigrants not contributed much to society that was not there previously? The actual spending on immigrants is minimal, literally you are flipping out over smidgens.

[Fentoine Lum]

We will no longer surrender our nation to the false song of globalism.

We never did, we occupy the planet militarily and war constantly, and we advertised our disdain for human rights. We also should surrender the false song of global rule by american militarism.

[Legion]

We never did, we occupy the planet militarily and war constantly, and we advertised our disdain for human rights. We also should surrender the false song of global rule by american militarism.

"We?"

[Fentoine Lum]

"We?"

Murka. You know. Yeah, you do.

[Fentoine Lum]

"We?"

Nikki Haley.

[Fentoine Lum]

"We?"

Withdrawal from the UN Council in Human Rights, that was a proper move given our behavior and values.

[Fentoine Lum]

"We?"

Murikkka

[Fentoine Lum]

"We?"

If you're american, who knows.

[Fentoine Lum]

"We?"

Yaba daba doo.

[Legion]

Yaba daba doo.

"We?"