Members banned from this thread: Cypress, evince, domer76, archives, Nomad, floridafan and Oneuli |
anonymoose (12-18-2018)
cancel2 2022 (12-18-2018)
cancel2 2022 (12-18-2018)
I am very far from right wing, but I feel no need to prove that to you. I will point out though that the scientific method is not interested in political correctness, contrived consensus, or voters. This shouldn't be news to you but apparently is. Let me ask you this question, which of the four Representative Concentration Pathways, outlined in the IPCC AR5 report, do you consider the most likely?
Last edited by cancel2 2022; 12-18-2018 at 04:26 AM.
Across all RCP's, why do you think one or some would be more likely than others!
Look across all RCP's, I believe the study indicates a rise in future Sea Levels, and a rise in Global Mean Temperature.
I think some of the study may be guesswork, because there is no real way to project that far into the future, not knowing how much coal vs. green energy sources the planet will be using in the future- not even in the 21st century- much less beyond that!
So which ones do you have a problem with?
If havana poon farted in the empty woods would he be raped by a grizzly? Your zen question of the day
Well for a start the values for ECS and TCR are going down all the time, as shown in the recent Curry-Lewis paper. If you need an explanation of the significance of this then please ask. To my mind RCP8.5 is impossible and RCP6.0 extremely unlikely.
https://climateaudit.org/2018/04/24/...e-sensitivity/
https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10....LI-D-17-0667.1
cancel2 2022 (12-19-2018)
Silly parrot.
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
Bookmarks