Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 456789 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 124

Thread: It’s Mullet Friday!

  1. #106 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    it wasn't edited it was REPLACED by a latter day interview by Strzok
    ( which makes them useless as contemporaneous notes)..more Mueller monkey business
    CNN isn’t reporting it so he doesn’t believe it happened lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  2. #107 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,662
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,622 Times in 21,485 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I Love America View Post
    When did I say I believed Flynn lied?

    I don’t believe that

    Never said I believe that. More GayRod faulty premises at work
    I thought you did, sorry....

    So why did Trump fire him?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  3. #108 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,662
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,622 Times in 21,485 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Beto Omar View Post
    CNN isn’t reporting it so he doesn’t believe it happened lol.
    It appears nobody is reporting it, you can't even come up with anything.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  4. #109 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,662
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,622 Times in 21,485 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    it wasn't edited it was REPLACED by a latter day interview by Strzok
    ( which makes them useless as contemporaneous notes)..more Mueller monkey business
    Where did you get this from? Do you have a citation?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  5. #110 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    A whistleblower claims that then-National-Security Adviser Michael Flynn promised that sanctions on Russia would be “ripped up,” enabling a business project for which he’d worked to move forward, according to Representative Elijah Cummings, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the...rticle/547685/

    Flynn, just like the Trumps were hoping to benefit personally from the ordeal. One crook attracts the others. They all came together for $$$$

    how do you figure Flynn would "personally benefit?"

    However this looks to be true (below) - as Flynn wanted to partner more with Russia instead of sanction it.
    He primarily wanted to peel Russia away from China - but also use that partnership to stabilize the Middle east and use Russia more as a partner then an adversary.

    The Middle East reactors plan was first reported by Newsweek in June. The elaborate plan was backed by a range of ex-military brass, who nicknamed it the “Marshall Plan.”
    The U.S. would partner with Russia’s state-run nuclear-energy agency to build civilian nuclear plants across the Middle East. Saudi Arabia would bankroll the construction, and Arab countries would buy military equipment from Russia under the deal, which aimed to convince Arab countries to give up plans to start their own nuclear programs.
    Flynn traveled to Egypt and Israel on behalf of the plan, but he didn’t disclose his role until February, two days before he was fired from the administration, and he did not disclose that he’d been paid for it.
    Which was a fantastic great idea until the Russiaphobes destroyed it and Flynn.
    Recall Russia is building a nuke plant in Egypt.

    Putin and Sisi Finalize $30 Billion Nuclear Plant Deal December 11, 2017
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...eal-boost-ties

    Pact to build nuclear plant signed during Putin visit to Cairo
    Russia’s Rosatom has waited three years for Egypt project
    Kissinger: “demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.”
    ________

    Cold War 2.0 Russia hysteria is turning people’s brains into guacamole.
    We’ve got to find a way to snap out of the propaganda trance
    ________

    Buddha: "trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it "
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7. All Good Children Go to Heaven

  6. #111 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Where did you get this from? Do you have a citation?
    Circa news. let me see if I can find it

  7. #112 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Circa news. let me see if I can find it
    https://saraacarter.com/fbi-docs-rev...-he-was-lying/

    the documents also include the FBI’s “302” report regarding Flynn’s interview with anti-Trump former FBI Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Agent Joe Pientka when they met with him at the White House.
    It is not, however, the 302 document from the actual January, 2017 interview but an August, 2017 report of Strzok’s recollections of the interview.
    The July 2017 report, however, was the interview with Strzok. It described his interview with Flynn but was not the original Flynn interview.

    On Thursday, FBI Supervisory Agent Jeff Danik told SaraACarter.com that Sullivan must also request all the communications between the two agents, as well as their supervisors around the August 2017 time-frame in order to get a complete and accurate picture of what transpired.
    Danik, who is an expert in FBI policy, says it is imperative that Sullivan also request “the workflow chart, which would show one-hundred percent, when the 302s were created when they were sent to a supervisor and who approved them.”

    He stressed, “the bureau policy – the absolute FBI policy – is that the notes must be placed in the system in a 1-A file within five days of the interview.” Danik said that the handwritten notes get placed into the FBI Sentinel System, which is the FBI’s main record keeping system.

    “Anything beyond five business days is a problem, eight months is a disaster,” he added.

  8. #113 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    It appears nobody is reporting it, you can't even come up with anything.
    Nobody lol? Do you ever read the WSJ?
    _____

    Given his history with the FBI, the judge may also have some questions about the curious date on the Flynn 302—Aug. 22, 2017, seven months after the interview. Texts from Mr. Strzok and testimony from Mr. Comey both suggest the 302 was written long before then. Was the 302 edited in the interim? If so, by whom, and at whose direction? FBI officials initially testified to Congress that the agents did not think Mr. Flynn had lied.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj...er-11544745831
    __________

    So, why the hanky-panky with Flynn’s 302? Mullet trying to pull a fast one on Judge Emmet Sullivan? Or did the FBI screw it up and Mullet just found out about it?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (12-15-2018)

  10. #114 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,662
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,622 Times in 21,485 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Beto Omar View Post
    Nobody lol? Do you ever read the WSJ?
    _____

    Given his history with the FBI, the judge may also have some questions about the curious date on the Flynn 302—Aug. 22, 2017, seven months after the interview. Texts from Mr. Strzok and testimony from Mr. Comey both suggest the 302 was written long before then. Was the 302 edited in the interim? If so, by whom, and at whose direction? FBI officials initially testified to Congress that the agents did not think Mr. Flynn had lied.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj...er-11544745831
    __________

    So, why the hanky-panky with Flynn’s 302? Mullet trying to pull a fast one on Judge Emmet Sullivan? Or did the FBI screw it up and Mullet just found out about it?
    finally a citation... Thank you...

    Your citation only say that some facts "suggest" your claims... so, its something suggested, not a true citation for your allegation. I see why you did not want to provide the citation.

    So still no citation supporting the allegation. Just that the date stamp is not the date the document was written, might have many other explanations. Typical of the Trump defenders grasping at straws.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  11. #115 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,662
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,622 Times in 21,485 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    https://saraacarter.com/fbi-docs-rev...-he-was-lying/

    the documents also include the FBI’s “302” report regarding Flynn’s interview with anti-Trump former FBI Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Agent Joe Pientka when they met with him at the White House.
    It is not, however, the 302 document from the actual January, 2017 interview but an August, 2017 report of Strzok’s recollections of the interview.
    The July 2017 report, however, was the interview with Strzok. It described his interview with Flynn but was not the original Flynn interview.

    On Thursday, FBI Supervisory Agent Jeff Danik told SaraACarter.com that Sullivan must also request all the communications between the two agents, as well as their supervisors around the August 2017 time-frame in order to get a complete and accurate picture of what transpired.
    Danik, who is an expert in FBI policy, says it is imperative that Sullivan also request “the workflow chart, which would show one-hundred percent, when the 302s were created when they were sent to a supervisor and who approved them.”

    He stressed, “the bureau policy – the absolute FBI policy – is that the notes must be placed in the system in a 1-A file within five days of the interview.” Danik said that the handwritten notes get placed into the FBI Sentinel System, which is the FBI’s main record keeping system.

    “Anything beyond five business days is a problem, eight months is a disaster,” he added.
    and this MUST mean that the 302 was nepheriously edited?

    So you have nothing to back up the claim?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  12. #116 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    and this MUST mean that the 302 was nepheriously edited?

    So you have nothing to back up the claim?
    put it this way..why was it replaced from the original the agents write up?
    Because they thought Flynn was not lying -an inconvenient truth for Mueller-so he replaced it

  13. #117 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,662
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,622 Times in 21,485 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    put it this way..why was it replaced from the original the agents write up?
    Because they thought Flynn was not lying -an inconvenient truth for Mueller-so he replaced it
    Who says it was?

    I understand why you did not want to give me the citations.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  14. #118 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    finally a citation... Thank you...

    Your citation only say that some facts "suggest" your claims... so, its something suggested, not a true citation for your allegation. I see why you did not want to provide the citation.

    So still no citation supporting the allegation. Just that the date stamp is not the date the document was written, might have many other explanations. Typical of the Trump defenders grasping at straws.
    You obviously don’t like to have Mullet questioned lol.

    A 302 is a legal document. You just don’t slap any old date on documented evidence that’s going to be used in a criminal trial. Flynn was interviewed a full seventh months before the date stamped on the 302. That raises some serious questions. In fact, I’m suprised the defense didn’t move to have it thrown out altogether.

    I wonder when they were made aware of it.

    In my line of work we have an operating room record: patient name, procedure, who is on the team etc. If the date on the OR record doesn’t match the date when malpractice is alleged—someone in the courtroom has a big problem. And there is ABSOLUTELY NO EDITING OF IT after the fact. That’s a felony.

    If you want to contend a 302 is handled differently, let’s see the evidence.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (12-15-2018)

  16. #119 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Who says it was?

    I understand why you did not want to give me the citations.
    I just GAVE IT TO YOU.
    The 302 agents notes of that day were replaced by a Strok deposition months later

  17. #120 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    I just GAVE IT TO YOU.
    The 302 agents notes of that day were replaced by a Strok deposition months later
    Strzok was fired for anti-Trump animus [aka TDS lol]. How in the hell, is any deposition by Strzok allowed to stand as evidence against Flynn in a courtroom?

    Unbelievable.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

Similar Threads

  1. Is Mullet feeling the heat?
    By Darth Omar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 06-18-2018, 07:22 AM
  2. Is this a Good Friday or what? Treason Scoreboard! Happy Friday
    By Bourbon in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-17-2018, 11:29 AM
  3. Let’s say Mullet wants to go over your smart phone
    By Darth Omar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-06-2018, 09:53 PM
  4. Just what the Hell does Mullet think he’s doing?
    By Darth Omar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 203
    Last Post: 06-06-2018, 05:18 PM
  5. The Mullet
    By cawacko in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-18-2010, 04:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •