Members banned from this thread: evince, domer76, Nomad, CharacterAssassin, katzgar, Guno צְבִי, Rat Robbersson, LV426 and reagansghost


Page 1 of 10 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 137

Thread: Cohen is Sentenced - Does it mean Mueller has NOTHING?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,336 Times in 22,665 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Cohen is Sentenced - Does it mean Mueller has NOTHING?

    In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

    What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,935
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,544 Times in 9,995 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    Nothing about the bimbo payments was illegal. This is total b.s.

    What Cohen is guilty of (apparently) is lying to the IRS and banks about his own income. Nothing to do with Trump.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Oh yea ... that has to be it ....
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,595
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Nothing about the bimbo payments was illegal. This is total b.s.

    What Cohen is guilty of (apparently) is lying to the IRS and banks about his own income. Nothing to do with Trump.
    he can face a pretty stiff fine for campaign violations

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,682
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,632 Times in 21,491 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

    What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
    No

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,682
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,632 Times in 21,491 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zymurgy View Post
    he can face a pretty stiff fine for campaign violations
    Trump actually can go to prison for the campaign finance violations. They tried to put John Edwards in prison for basically the same thing, Jerry just did not agree based on those facts.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    kudzu (12-12-2018)

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    156
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 27 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

    What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
    Or he has already given them everything they need and are adding it to the pile for when they finish this

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,595
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Trump actually can go to prison for the campaign finance violations. They tried to put John Edwards in prison for basically the same thing, Jerry just did not agree based on those facts.
    tried and failed. No precedence exists for anything but a stiff fine.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to zymurgy For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-12-2018)

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Keep Hope Alive ...
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,682
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,632 Times in 21,491 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zymurgy View Post
    tried and failed. No precedence exists for anything but a stiff fine.
    So using your logic, slashing your ex-wife’s throat with a knife only comes with a fine because the jury found O.J. Not-guilty?

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    kudzu (12-12-2018)

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,595
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    So using your logic, slashing your ex-wife’s throat with a knife only comes with a fine because the jury found O.J. Not-guilty?
    yeah - because that is the only case involving murder

    do you shit stains every step back and see how stupid your replies come across?

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to zymurgy For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-12-2018)

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,682
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,632 Times in 21,491 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny2009 View Post
    Or he has already given them everything they need and are adding it to the pile for when they finish this
    They are not looking for him to testify, he is a liar, they used him for other more definatitive hard evidence.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    kudzu (12-12-2018)

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,682
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,632 Times in 21,491 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zymurgy View Post
    yeah - because that is the only case involving murder

    do you shit stains every step back and see how stupid your replies come across?
    My point, and you know it, is that just because a jury finds someone not guilty does not mean the alleged crime is only punishable by a fine.

  19. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,595
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    My point, and you know it, is that just because a jury finds someone not guilty does not mean the alleged crime is only punishable by a fine.
    my point is this would be the first jail time for such a thing. no history exists for such a stiff penalty. none. We would become a banana republic if Demos pursue this idiocy

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to zymurgy For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-12-2018)

  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Three years in prison for pay-offs to influence an election?

    ... and the "Individual-1" that coordinated and paid for these pay-offs gets what?

    What more evidence do you need to impeach after such a crime?

    Bill Clinton did far less?







    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

Similar Threads

  1. Cohen's getting sentenced as I post.........show time!
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-12-2018, 11:34 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-10-2018, 10:53 AM
  3. Breaking news: Cohen to cooperate with Mueller....
    By Nomad in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 06-14-2018, 07:49 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-15-2018, 04:07 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-14-2018, 10:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •