Who's Going to Pay for the Wall

[montgomery]

I don't fucking want back in to the childs table

You haven't shown any indication yet that you would be an asset on the APP section. But I'm not finished with you yet sweet cheeks!

[montgomery]

Hello montgomery,



Good luck with that. I can't picture it happening.

Before you came here, we had a thing. A lot of people agreed to have a 'Clean Debate Week.'

I didn't start it, but I was all for it. Of course, I signed right on without hesitation. I didn't have to change any of my habits to participate. (Actually, every week is clean debate week for me.)

Evince also agreed to participate, (surprisingly,) and then when it actually came around, didn't even last the first morning. No way evince could last in APP.

Evince thinks being nasty is an effective way to change people's minds, thinks it is a way to 'put down lies.'

I think it runs off polite people who are offended. It actually did that to one person that I am well acquainted with. I had enjoyed exchanging posts and messages with this individual on another smaller chat board. I told him about this place and he was intrigued by the volume. I said, man, there is so much activity you can't possibly keep up. I said this is the big time, and warned him it is rough. He agreed to try it. I don't think he made it to 10 posts before Evince got a hold of him and jumped down his throat in a super-vulgar way. He told me: "No thanks," and promptly left. We still exchange emails. He said it was because of Evince.

Being nasty runs polite people off. Those could be more voices to put down lies, much more effective than fewer nasty people saying the same ugly things over and over, becoming desensitized to it, assuming everybody does it and is also desensitized to it. Everybody is not desensitized to it, and it runs them off. The evidence is the member list. Ever look at at? Just start anywhere and begin reading the stats. Most of the 'members' are not active. They showed up, made a few posts, and left.

We are left to wonder why.

Take a big fat guess.

So you're suggesting that I ruined your 'clean debate week'??

Anyway, whether I did or not, thanks for reassuring me that I'm having a big impact on this forum! It's not hard, and frankly I have a hard time keeping in mind that this ugly clusterfuk is not representative of most Americans. Please say it ain't so!
Really, it's pretty bad and if not for the possibility of turning the APP section into something decent, I would be saying goodbye.

Not to suggest that I'm getting some pleasure out of the antics of the extreme right shitheads as they try to destroy any hope of turning the APP section into something worthwhile! "I Love America" has turned into a quivering piece of jelly already!

[hvilleherb]

Who's Going to Pay for the Wall

We can get Mexicans to pay for it by enacting a tax on foreign money transfers.

You Democrats should be in favor of it. Consider it a jobs project for Democrats with no job skills.

[Loving91390]

Not having to pay welfare for anchor babies will pay for it .....

[Flash]

We can get Mexicans to pay for it by enacting a tax on foreign money transfers.

Maybe Trump should introduce legislation for that tax rather than asking Congress for money.

[Nordberg]

Trump has a billion .5 already and has not spent it on a wall. Trump is not building a wall. Never intended to. It was a story to stir up haters and it worked like a charm.

[Guno צְבִי]

We can get Mexicans to pay for it by enacting a tax on foreign money transfers.

You Democrats should be in favor of it. Consider it a jobs project for Democrats with no job skills.

[signalmankenneth]

[PoliTalker]

Hello montgomery,

So you're suggesting that I ruined your 'clean debate week'??

No, not at all. Where did you get that?

Anyway, whether I did or not, thanks for reassuring me that I'm having a big impact on this forum! It's not hard, and frankly I have a hard time keeping in mind that this ugly clusterfuk is not representative of most Americans. Please say it ain't so!

This forum is definitely not representative of most Americans.

Really, it's pretty bad and if not for the possibility of turning the APP section into something decent, I would be saying goodbye.

I would not be surprised. Many have come and made a few posts, then decided this place is too rough and left, never to return. Nastiness runs them off.

Not to suggest that I'm getting some pleasure out of the antics of the extreme right shitheads as they try to destroy any hope of turning the APP section into something worthwhile! "I Love America" has turned into a quivering piece of jelly already!

All that is required to make APP more active is simply start posting there and having conversations. Those who are allowed will participate if they want to. Expecting it to all change quickly is expecting too much. I would like it if APP were more popular. Good things often take time to build.

[katzgar]

Not having to pay welfare for anchor babies will pay for it .....

I think you've been hiding out in the bushes. trump said Mexico is going to pay for the wall. Do you remember that?

[Getin the ring]

Mexico has already paid for the wall, like 4 times, when are the nut-bags going to start listening to what Trump says.

the only thing left to do is allocate the money properly

[Heff]

I wonder if anyone remembers what Trump said he’d do if Mexico wouldn’t fork over money for the wall? It was a part of his immigration plan the media never talked about, and hence, doesn’t exist to anti-Trumpers.

[katzgar]

Mexico has already paid for the wall, like 4 times, when are the nut-bags going to start listening to what Trump says.

the only thing left to do is allocate the money properly

The only response to that comment is to laugh at you

[Getin the ring]

The only response to that comment is to laugh at you

not good with numbers?

[katzgar]

not good with numbers?

you are a confused drug addled liar