Reply With QuoteI have read it with comprehension.Originally Posted by Gunny2009
Give that a try...and then we can have a meaningful discussion.
Verified User
Because of the superficial talking points you used.
You used those points to cast yourself as a "both sider" so you can continue spewing forth Conservative rhetoric and talking points.
It's by design; you're hoping that the talking points will give you enough "cred" to advance your previous positions under a new, more credible persona.
The problem is that you've already used that tactic twice in the last ten years; first, when you stapled teabags to your face, and then again when you took the teabags off and put a red hat on.
You're not fooling anyone.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
High Level of Addiction
JPP Contributor
I have read it with comprehension.
Give that a try...and then we can have a meaningful discussion.
Diversity Makes Greatness
Frank and Gunny2009,
Your fight is not determining the abilities of each other to read or understand the Constitution.
Your fight is that you both interpret it differently.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks