I love when Nancy told him he didn’t have the votes in the house.

[Jarod]

Dude ... January the Fun Begins ... Republicans can't handle Women in Power.

It is going to be exciting, as long as it lasts.

[Getin the ring]

The refreshing part of all of this is that Pelosi and Schumer have been exposed.

Finally in Trump we have someone that says what the people are thinking.
Would it make sense to put funding up beore the house, knowing full well the sad face Democrats in the Senate would sooner die than give it the 60 vote threshold,
so why should we have to listen to Nancy grandstand, politics as usual with her, they would waste our money in a heartbeat knowing the outcome is foregone conclusion.
Trump won't

pay attention folks, our government working like it was intended by our forefathers is why trump was elected.
transparent, common sense for the people, by the people

[Tkaffen]

Let’s bring the illegals into California. They can live in San Francisco and camp out and shit on the sidewalk at the Pacific Heights neighborhood where millionaires like Pelosi live.
Is Pelosi blind to the problems in the state of California and San Francisco or simply doesn’t care.

[anonymoose]

I love when Nancy told him he didn’t have the votes in the house.

Votes for what?

Watch the video,

I would if there was one.

[ZappasGuitar]

YOU? Honest?

In truth, he wasn't. In fact, during his SOTU he even declared like a Fascist dictator he would act without the Congress. Why are you such a prolific lying dunce?

You are once again deflecting from the answer to my question; why was obstructionism NOT okay when Obama was President, but now, suddenly okay? You're going to need to extract your head from your asshole to answer that one honestly.

There you go lying again. First and foremost; when Obamacare was passed, there were no checks. Democrats controlled the house and the Senate. Why are you such a dishonest buffoon?

Secondly, there was never a "Republican" solution and Obamacare was hardly anything the Republicans supported. In fact, something you avoid, Obamacare was passed along straight party line votes without ANY input from the Republicans.

Wrong again; using Obamacare as your example misses the entire point of obstructionism and checks and balances because Democrats had complete control of the House and the Senate. I do wish you had a brain; but unfortunately, you do not. I also wish you were honest, but based on the massive lies, deflections and hypocrisy you have exhibited, that too is impossible.

What you really need to picture is that your example has NOTHING to do with my questions.

Ironic in that what we are seeing right now from the Democrats is brainless obstructionism. They cant even explain, other than they hate Trump, why they oppose the border wall or any of Trumps agenda.

If you had a brain, and were honest, you too could comprehend the OBVIOUS. But, because you are a dishonest, hyper partisan, lying liberal on steroids, you shun the truth, facts and reality.

Why was obstructionism acceptable to you while Obama was President?

[Jarod]

Votes for what?
I would if there was one.

The video is all over the internet, you can watch it if you choose. He did not have the votes for his wall. Not in the House or Senate.

[Truth Detector]

I've got the idiot on ignore. Ask him why Republicans blocked Obama's bi partisan immigration bill, if border security is so important?

Republicans didn't block the bi-partisan bill you uninformed fool; Obama blocked it because he didn't agree with it. Nut then, if you were informed, you woudn't be the willful dupe you are for the Democratic Party of the Jackass.

White House Distances Itself From Bipartisan Border Bill
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...an-border-bill

[Truth Detector]

Market was up almost 300 points before president bone spurs promised to shut down the govt.

It's up about 8 points right now. It came crashing down as soon as he opened his mouth.

Is there a point to this moronic screed? Of course not. You sound just as stupid as Katzgar with his asinine "Trumps crashing the market."

[Truth Detector]

The refreshing part of all of this is that Pelosi and Schumer have been exposed.

Finally in Trump we have someone that says what the people are thinking.
Would it make sense to put funding up beore the house, knowing full well the sad face Democrats in the Senate would sooner die than give it the 60 vote threshold,
so why should we have to listen to Nancy grandstand, politics as usual with her, they would waste our money in a heartbeat knowing the outcome is foregone conclusion.
Trump won't

pay attention folks, our government working like it was intended by our forefathers is why trump was elected.
transparent, common sense for the people, by the people

[Truth Detector]

Why was obstructionism acceptable to you while Obama was President?

Why is it suddenly OKAY now when you morons whined about it snowflake. I am not complaining about Democrats playing the obstruction game dumb fuck.

I am asking why you dishonest hypocrites who whined and bitched about then, think it is okay now?

I understand why you dishonest morons can't answer the question and choose to deflect, whine and bitch like little vaginas.

[Truth Detector]

He did not have the votes for his wall. Not in the House or Senate.

I didn't know there even was a bill before the House and Senate. How can you know you don't have the votes a bill doesn't even exist?

Now, if Republicans want to stand with the Democratic Party of the Jackass, they do so at their own political risk. And if Democrats are not interested in even presenting a bill, then Trump most surely can try to build that security without them. After all, he is doing his job enforcing existing law.

So you are for obstruction now right? I can remember all the times you bitched an whined about it when Obama was in the White House.

[Guno צְבִי]

It was on video snowflake; I can't wait to see it to find out how exaggerated you dishonest leftist hypocrites are making this.

poor fritzy with the goyishe kop

[anonymoose]

The video is all over the internet, you can watch it if you choose. He did not have the votes for his wall. Not in the House or Senate.

I don't see it here . That's as far as I'm looking. Not worth the effort. I got a bidness to run now that lunch is over.

[floridafan]

So you love obstructionism now snowflake? I remember when it was Obama you leftist hypocrites demanded that the Republicans should kowtow to Obama's agenda. What changed?

I also don't recall you guys cheering that Republicans took back the House as being a check on the Presidency; now you think it is needed? What changed?

How can you have obstructionism when the entire government is controlled by republicans?

[floridafan]

I didn't know there even was a bill before the House and Senate. How can you know you don't have the votes a bill doesn't even exist?

Now, if Republicans want to stand with the Democratic Party of the Jackass, they do so at their own political risk. And if Democrats are not interested in even presenting a bill, then Trump most surely can try to build that security without them. After all, he is doing his job enforcing existing law.

So you are for obstruction now right? I can remember all the times you bitched an whined about it when Obama was in the White House.

The very day that trump said Mexico would pay for the wall, meant that either they would or a bill would never pass. Now whose fault is it.